I'd have thought the point of a newbie system would be to weed out self important people who are incapable of expressing their opinion without throwing around insults, but here you are so...
With virtually every United journalist now running the story, although thank God it looks like we're handicapped in getting him and will have to look elsewhere, it's perhaps a useful lesson in digital literacy for you that when journalists all post similar things with similar wording at similar times then they've got a source.
But besides that point, perhaps you should reread the post you responded to? I merely suggested, in far less emotive language than you yourself deployed, that there is a disappointing pattern to the players we've signed, made offers for and been linked to by reliable journalists, that bears more than a passing resemblance to the way we operated last summer (including overpaying for a youth talent based on potential) whilst even allowing for the fact that other explanations could be possible. If you want to see a marked change then sure, but I'm certain one is only able to see a marked change if one is actively looking to see a marked change. After all, basically every reliable journalist who spoke about INEOS going into this window mentioned that it was probably too soon to see drastic changes, so it would not be a surprise if we were working off a target list drawn up under the old regime where ten Hag had an outsized influence in recruitment. I think that's disappointing, and you don't want it to be true, but it looks like it is what it is.