| Season | Days | Injuries | Games missed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23/24 | 96 days | 5 | 19 |
| 22/23 | 72 days | 3 | 12 |
| 21/22 | 56 days | 4 | 11 |
| 20/21 | 107 days | 4 | 31 |
| 19/20 | 49 days | 4 | 16 |
| 18/19 | 21 days | 2 | 7 |
| L17/18 | 21 days | 1 | 4 |
This would go heavily against any trend we have seen with our team, wouldn't it?
I am a bit worried about the guy. Statistically, not all transfers will be successes and my money would be on him to be honest. Not a fan of both Bayern transfers but might be connected with my dislike of that club more than the actual players themselves.
️Add to this base fee of €15m I cannot see a better value for money option in the market.
The Dutch and German leagues have 4 fewer games and no equivalent of the league cup.
From a quick wiki scan of their recent seasons, it seems rare for their top appearance maker to have more than 45-50 games in a season in all comps.
Amad was a solskjaer signing and Garna came through the academy. Otherwise yes, I feel like the Ten Hag only signing Ajax players meme has been done to death.
He offered nothing when playing. AWB played out of position was still a better defender than Reguilon.
Thank feck we didn’t go down this road again this summer.
Garna was also a ole signing from A Madrid
This is not encouraging, to say the least. Sounds like we got rinsed.
That is the opposite to how I saw it. Reguilon was far better than AWB even on AWB’s preferred side.
He was talking about the scouts not doing their job when clearly whe have always had one of the best scouting, and have also signed lots of good players over the years.
The 5+1 is basically to amortise the cost of the transfer over 5 years to allow for more scope to get other players in this window. The actual PSR cost of this transfer would only by 3m this year due to the 5 year contract. Also, not difficult to move him on with a small PSR profit in a few years if we have to. He will get 8-10m for sure.
TBF, at some point it can't be just a coincidence.
Reguilon started well in his first few games. Dropped off after that and was average at best in most of the games.
This thinking is crazy. He clearly was a ‘scout network signing’. Has nothing to do with the manager. What’s next, Louis van Gaal signed Mainoo as a 6 years old when he was manager?
Dumfries hasn’t played a back four in years, has he? His stature is fully based on a wing back in a back 5 system. Would struggle much more to adapt.
Depth in the treatment room? So sounds like he could easily miss a third of the season, if that coincides with dalot or Shaw bring injured we are down to the bones again
We really should not be signing players just to suit ten hags system. That's what Antony and mount were for and they worked out well
Yeah, it’s a weird justification. If anything your squad depth players need to be more injury free because they need to come at any point to replace the first choice guy.
Who cares about the past 5 years? If he missed a lot recently that's more worrying. What were the injuries? Was it something recurring all of a sudden? There has to be a decay factor in analysing historically otherwise it's a statistical bias.
