When it comes to scoring goals. Haaland seems better. Yeah R9 had step overs, but Haaland is a scoring freak.
I really dont like the comparisons with R9. They are not very similar to me.
I feel tears in my eyes, Woodward refused to sign and got Donny insteadDepressing as hell. I don't even want to watch football anymore.
Haaland is playing lower quality opposition than R9 with the expanded field. Might be interesting to remove the easy games and see how many Haaland scored then.
This exactly.The guy is a bigger faster Shearer, not R9.
This exactly.
Not sure why there are R9 comparisons at all. Strength is about it. R9 had more ball skill but was 6 inches smaller.
Be as well comparing him to Crouch ( which would be equally pointless)
His biggest Idol is Zlatan. Both shared Raiola as an agent before his passing. I see Haaland doing 3 years average stints.Just hope he fancies moving around a bit. Some do and some don’t.
La Liga is stronger than EPL. 11 UCL wins since 2000 and 11 Europa League wins. Meanwhile EPL has 5 UCL wins and 4 Europa League wins. Only thing you might argue is that EPL is more competitive across the board but that's a myth in my eyes.Real Madrid in 2024 after Benzema retires then. Perez would do that in a heart-beat. He would move to a much weaker league though, so his scoring numbers would be astronomical.
Hahaha, made me laugh out loud. Perhaps in Bayern he could come close. But he would need the perfect season as there is only 34 games in Buli.Would score 50 goals in Bundesliga, just like Rashford.
Can see what you mean. The way he just bullies through. Haaland is Zlatans strength and height, minus the technique but with R9s pace, finishing and pure force. Incredible!Shades of R9 about this. Genuine physical freak combined with first class movement and finishing. Just lacks a bit of Ronaldo's skill.
Mbappe is indeed very similar to R9 with shades of Henry. I actually feel he is getting underrated because he plays for PSG. He would rip the EPL to absolute shreds just like Haaland is doing.Mbappe is that full package
I've never ever seen a player compared to both Ronaldo and John Carew before. Haaland really is specialQuite clear he's a unique archetype. Has the speed of Ronaldo, but the size and power of Carew. Predatory instincts of box strikers and an innate awareness of where to be across the final 3rd before he even makes his runs.
The pace and power is absolutely freakish, which is the only likeness to Ronaldo outside of being prolific that I can see.
But yeah, football is seeing something bizarre in a player so big being so impossibly hard to match for speed over any distance, and yet a natural, organic striker in minute spaces in the penalty area.
Shearer's pre-injury game did not have so much box work like Haaland and a lot more long-range work. I see they have a little overlap, but you can say that with Haaland and a lot of elite strikers; you can even put some Greaves or Müller in there or the Ajax Van Basten and have some overlap, but nothing really matches if you dig deeper. Klinsmann in some ways, but nowhere near the German with his heading.This exactly.
Not sure why there are R9 comparisons at all. Strength is about it. R9 had more ball skill but was 6 inches smaller.
Be as well comparing him to Crouch ( which would be equally pointless)
Not many 6' 4" strikers out there who are fast, let alone lightening. It's freakish.I've never ever seen a player compared to both Ronaldo and John Carew before. Haaland really is special
We can always laugh at his face.
I disagree. I think they just have different skillsets and Ronaldo's game didn't showcase his poacher attributes, though I don't think he was any worse positionally than Haaland is now. Without wishing to relitigate the R7 vs Messi argument, I think this similarly comes down to what you privilege more. But I suspect that if you asked most people born in the mid 80s and before (no dig at you, I absolutely know that your footie knowledge is exemplary) most would take R9 without question.I love Ronaldo but it’s like comparing him to Gerd Muller and pretending he was equally as good at getting these goals just because he was amazing on the ball. He was way better at many things. But that wasn’t his strength and this strength that Haaland has is not as impressive but it is incredibly valuable. Ronaldo wasn’t bad at it but he wasn’t even as good as someone like van Nistelrooy at it. That was clear at the time. Haaland appears to be on another level.
Argue against it then other than saying “no it’s not”I wish people would stop saying this.
CL is a pretty different format now though, no?I havent checked the numbers but arent Haaland scoring way more than R9?
I think Haaland already surpased Ronaldos all time CL scoring. Which is insane.
Because one was legitimately being bracketed as one of the best players of all time by the age Haaland is now, and not because of just athleticism but also astonishing technique.I don't see why these comparisons to Ronaldo are so insulting. He's a bit of an anomaly... thus why he absurdly stands out, and did so well before today or even his signing at City. Ronaldo was also an anomaly and that was clear as day at an incredibly young age too. Which is where the comparison is, not necasarrily with a direct similar skillset.
He's already done it at a CL level(with 2 teams), an international level against nations above his, and now ... his fourth league, at 22. All with relative ease. Whether he qualifies for an international tournament isn't solely on him.
Already posted. Athleticism, sure. Goals, too. That shouldn't be enough.Argue against it then other than saying “no it’s not”
I’m 46 and watched a lot of ronaldos early years as I was obsessed with football when I was younger.
Haaland is similar in a lot of categories.
Goal scoring, physique, pace, determination. He’s not as skillful on the ball granted but in terms of impact as a relative youngster and his general aura on the pitch he’s very similar
Ofcorse.CL is a pretty different format now though, no?
Quite clear he's a unique archetype. Has the speed of Ronaldo, but the size and power of Carew. Predatory instincts of box strikers and an innate awareness of where to be across the final 3rd before he even makes his runs.
The pace and power is absolutely freakish, which is the only likeness to Ronaldo outside of being prolific that I can see.
But yeah, football is seeing something bizarre in a player so big being so impossibly hard to match for speed over any distance, and yet a natural, organic striker in minute spaces in the penalty area.
3 tap ins. Totally overrated.
He wont get past 70 this season
Don't get me wrong, I hate that he is playing for City, but I don't think we will ever experience a norwegian footballer as good as this ever again.As a norwegian I have absolutely no positive feelings about this.
Because one was legitimately being bracketed as one of the best players of all time by the age Haaland is now, and not because of just athleticism but also astonishing technique.
Speed and power and scoring lots of goals are really broad points of comparison with all the filling scooped out.
Only problem is that Haaland was in one of the lower quality expanded teams... And yeah, he was scoring there too.Haaland is playing lower quality opposition than R9 with the expanded field. Might be interesting to remove the easy games and see how many Haaland scored then.
It's been reported even by City correspondents when he signedThis hasn't been reported by anyone reliable. Don't pin your hopes on him leaving over the next decade.