- Joined
- Jan 16, 2006
- Messages
- 21,342
I'd be very surprised if we bought anyone of note in January.
that be just crazy....
I'd be very surprised if we bought anyone of note in January.
Can't we just force Barcelona to sell Xavi & Inesta to us?
Even without Fletcher we still have Carrick, Anderson and Cleverley as specialist midfielders as well as the likes of Giggs, Jones and Park who will play there. No need to buy anyone.
Frank Lampard on loan imo
Giggs Jones and Park are not natural cm, neither is Rooney either. Anderson and Cleverley are both still injured and its difficullt to said even when they come back they be match-fit.
To be fair I think we need a midfielder too but we've put ourselves in a position where everyone knows that and teams will want top dollar for players, and we cannot afford to pay it.
How do you know we can't afford to buy?
I think Fergie is looking long term, will have his targets in mind, but prob for the summer, this season is a "transition" job, almost a write off. I anticipate some interesting activity in the summer but nada in January apart from a loan signing or two. IMHO
Sarni is a modern day Nostradamus. He knows everything.
Yeah, because I was so wrong last Summer when I posted the exact same thing.
It's funny how a lot of posters, including Pogue on the last page, suggested the same thing yet you still give me all the stick. And when I suggested that we could have signed Mata or Silva when we had the chance, I was wrong too because apparently we weren't financially capable of doing so.
Basically, I am always wrong, whichever way I go.
Yeah, because I was so wrong last Summer when I posted the exact same thing.
It's funny how a lot of posters, including Pogue on the last page, suggested the same thing yet you still give me all the stick. And when I suggested that we could have signed Mata or Silva when we had the chance, I was wrong too because apparently we weren't financially capable of doing so.
Basically, I am always wrong, whichever way I go.
Yeah, because I was so wrong last Summer when I posted the exact same thing.
It's funny how a lot of posters, including Pogue on the last page, suggested the same thing yet you still give me all the stick. And when I suggested that we could have signed Mata or Silva when we had the chance, I was wrong too because apparently we weren't financially capable of doing so.
Basically, I am always wrong, whichever way I go.
It's alright we have a lot of people on here who seem to live with a red blindfold on. When we miss out on a player it's because he's a mercenary or because he was always going to another club. But when you suggest we obviously can't compete financially you are deemed to be some blasphemer.
Yeah, because I was so wrong last Summer when I posted the exact same thing.
It's funny how a lot of posters, including Pogue on the last page, suggested the same thing yet you still give me all the stick. And when I suggested that we could have signed Mata or Silva when we had the chance, I was wrong too because apparently we weren't financially capable of doing so.
Basically, I am always wrong, whichever way I go.
Was that the Summer when we paid the second highest fee ever by a considerable margin for a goalkeeper as well as spending one of the largest amounts ever to sign a teenager?
Was that the Summer when we paid the second highest fee ever by a considerable margin for a goalkeeper as well as spending one of the largest amounts ever to sign a teenager?
Giggs is these days. Has been for years. Strange that people don't accept that yet.Giggs Jones and Park are not natural cm, neither is Rooney either.
Yes, the Summer when I said we wouldn't buy a midfielder and we didn't. According to people who slag me for saying that, it was because Sneijder wanted too much money and City overpriced Nasri. Nothing to do with money though.
Dont sugarcoat it, we also released 6/7 older players. Saving huge amounts on wages and getting some transfer fees back in.
Giggs is a very good player and can do a job anywhere but he's not much of a CMGiggs is these days. Has been for years. Strange that people don't accept that yet.
Jones I'm not sure about yet, but definitely agree with you on Park and Rooney. Hate seeing either of them in central midfield.
Yes, the Summer when I said we wouldn't buy a midfielder and we didn't. According to people who slag me for saying that, it was because Sneijder wanted too much money and City overpriced Nasri. Nothing to do with money though.
Do you think we should smash our wage structure to smithereens to bring a new player to the club?
Even if we could afford to pay Nasri £180k a week I wouldn't want us to. With the money that City offer prospective signings these days do you really think it's so outlandish a suggestion that they overpriced him?
Do you think we should smash our wage structure to smithereens to bring a new player to the club?
Even if we could afford to pay Nasri £180k a week I wouldn't want us to. With the money that City offer prospective signings these days do you really think it's so outlandish a suggestion that they overpriced him?
He predicted that we wouldn't spend anymore than £20 million and that we wouldn't sign a MF. We bought Jones, De Gea and Young for almost three times his prediction. His reaction? "Well, I was right, we didn't sign a MF."
If Sarni had any brains whatsoever he would pretend like his "predictions" last summer never happened. Yet he brings it up constantly.
Weirdo.
I said £20m net and already admitted being wrong about that one.
I was right about a midfielder.
And yet the wage bill increased by 12% in the first quarter of this financial year (July-September). You've had the likes of Smalling, Hernandez and Cleverley signing improved contracts to reflect their growing status in the first team squad and replacing those players who left.
Why would I? I was one of maybe a few people who weren't convinced we'd get a midfielder. It was a very good call.
You also predicted that we won't sign a MF next season, either. Still confident on that one?
Pretty much yes. Fletcher's disease changes things but we'd probably known about it before.
Still going to stalk me if we don't sign a midfielder again?
I find it hard to believe that departures of Scholes, Neville, Hargreaves, Van Der Sar, Brown and O'Shea didn't lower our wage bill, any evidence for that? Unless Scholes, Hargreaves and VDS weren't included at the beginning of that period (Neville couldn't have been) then it's strange.
Well yes, the evidence is the club's first quarter financial results!
It just demonstrates the rampant wage inflation in football and as Storey points out, you're only going to further that problem by paying someone like Nasri much more than the vast majority of our squad.