Nicolas Otamendi | City Player

Status
Not open for further replies.
Enormous yes but our defenders didnt just stand there, let opposing players through and watched DDG what will he do.

Actually for large chunks of the season that is what happened, teams played through us with ease and De Gea made a number of incredible stops, there's a reason he was MOTM most weeks for us.
 
Never rated him so dodged a bullet here. Great to know City are again wasting money. Sour grapes....
 
The funny thing is that the things being said about Otamendi now are more or less exactly what people said about Mangala last summer. People just like to moan and indulge in hysterics.

Last year our defence wasn't a big issue. Less than 1 goal a game in the league is fine. We were one goal off having the 2nd best defensive record in the league. City won the league with the exact same defensive record as us in 13/14 (37 goals conceded) and we had an even worse defensive record when we last won it in 12/13. Last season Chelsea conceded just 5 more goals.

Our defensive record will inevitably improve with Darmian, a fully fit Shaw and Schneiderlin and it's entirely possible that alone will close that 5 goal gap, so it's pretty clear we don't need another CB. If we want to compete in the CL then maybe we do, but that's something to think about next season. Our problem is our goalscoring.

Only two teams have won the PL by scoring less than 70 goals - United in 08/09, and Arsenal in 97/98, both with 68 goals. We managed just 62 last season and realistically need to find another 10 goals to have any real chance of competing. We should be competing with City for De Bruyne and Arsenal for Benzema, not City for Otamendi.

Good post.
 
Actually for large chunks of the season that is what happened, teams played through us with ease and De Gea made a number of incredible stops, there's a reason he was MOTM most weeks for us.
Let's just ignore the fact we had serious problems all over the back four with injuries.
Nor did we have a midfield to speak off.
 
Actually for large chunks of the season that is what happened, teams played through us with ease and De Gea made a number of incredible stops, there's a reason he was MOTM most weeks for us.
He didnt make 'a number of incredible stops' every game. It was common but not in large chunks of the season.
 
Let's just ignore the fact we had serious problems all over the back four with injuries.
Nor did we have a midfield to speak off.

We had Herrera, Carrick, Blind and Fellaini, so yes we had 4 CM's, and the injuries don't alter the huge flaws in the CB's when they played, but lets blame everyone else.
 
He didnt make 'a number of incredible stops' every game. It was common but not in large chunks of the season.

He made them in most games, he bailed us out time and again hence all the MTOM's and player of the season award. Your keeper doesn't get these things if the defense is good.
 
We had Herrera, Carrick, Blind and Fellaini, so yes we had 4 CM's, and the injuries don't alter the huge flaws in the CB's when they played, but lets blame everyone else.
Who's blaming everyone else? It's fact that we suffered injuries all season, or do you purposely leave out facts
As for saying injuries not altering the huge flaws in the CBs clearly shows your naivety when it come to football.
 
The funny thing is that the things being said about Otamendi now are more or less exactly what people said about Mangala last summer. People just like to moan and indulge in hysterics.

Last year our defence wasn't a big issue. Less than 1 goal a game in the league is fine. We were one goal off having the 2nd best defensive record in the league. City won the league with the exact same defensive record as us in 13/14 (37 goals conceded) and we had an even worse defensive record when we last won it in 12/13. Last season Chelsea conceded just 5 more goals.

Our defensive record will inevitably improve with Darmian, a fully fit Shaw and Schneiderlin and it's entirely possible that alone will close that 5 goal gap, so it's pretty clear we don't need another CB. If we want to compete in the CL then maybe we do, but that's something to think about next season. Our problem is our goalscoring.

Only two teams have won the PL by scoring less than 70 goals - United in 08/09, and Arsenal in 97/98, both with 68 goals. We managed just 62 last season and realistically need to find another 10 goals to have any real chance of competing. We should be competing with City for De Bruyne and Arsenal for Benzema, not City for Otamendi.

Well said.
 
The funny thing is that the things being said about Otamendi now are more or less exactly what people said about Mangala last summer. People just like to moan and indulge in hysterics.

Last year our defence wasn't a big issue. Less than 1 goal a game in the league is fine. We were one goal off having the 2nd best defensive record in the league. City won the league with the exact same defensive record as us in 13/14 (37 goals conceded) and we had an even worse defensive record when we last won it in 12/13. Last season Chelsea conceded just 5 more goals.

Our defensive record will inevitably improve with Darmian, a fully fit Shaw and Schneiderlin and it's entirely possible that alone will close that 5 goal gap, so it's pretty clear we don't need another CB. If we want to compete in the CL then maybe we do, but that's something to think about next season. Our problem is our goalscoring.

Only two teams have won the PL by scoring less than 70 goals - United in 08/09, and Arsenal in 97/98, both with 68 goals. We managed just 62 last season and realistically need to find another 10 goals to have any real chance of competing. We should be competing with City for De Bruyne and Arsenal for Benzema, not City for Otamendi.

Excellent post.

While its annoying that we aren't in for De Bruyne, but with Pedro maybe coming we perhaps need a striker more especially with Rooney's form.
 
The funny thing is that the things being said about Otamendi now are more or less exactly what people said about Mangala last summer. People just like to moan and indulge in hysterics.

Last year our defence wasn't a big issue. Less than 1 goal a game in the league is fine. We were one goal off having the 2nd best defensive record in the league. City won the league with the exact same defensive record as us in 13/14 (37 goals conceded) and we had an even worse defensive record when we last won it in 12/13. Last season Chelsea conceded just 5 more goals.

Our defensive record will inevitably improve with Darmian, a fully fit Shaw and Schneiderlin and it's entirely possible that alone will close that 5 goal gap, so it's pretty clear we don't need another CB. If we want to compete in the CL then maybe we do, but that's something to think about next season. Our problem is our goalscoring.

Only two teams have won the PL by scoring less than 70 goals - United in 08/09, and Arsenal in 97/98, both with 68 goals. We managed just 62 last season and realistically need to find another 10 goals to have any real chance of competing. We should be competing with City for De Bruyne and Arsenal for Benzema, not City for Otamendi.

Post of the month contender there :cool:

Somebody quote this on every page
 
He made them in most games, he bailed us out time and again hence all the MTOM's and player of the season award. Your keeper doesn't get these things if the defense is good.
You're putting it like in most games oponnent had 5 or 6 big chances with our defense just looking and DDG saving all of them. And it wasnt like that. In some games our defense was just good and in some oponnents had few chances.
 
The funny thing is that the things being said about Otamendi now are more or less exactly what people said about Mangala last summer. People just like to moan and indulge in hysterics.

Last year our defence wasn't a big issue. Less than 1 goal a game in the league is fine. We were one goal off having the 2nd best defensive record in the league. City won the league with the exact same defensive record as us in 13/14 (37 goals conceded) and we had an even worse defensive record when we last won it in 12/13. Last season Chelsea conceded just 5 more goals.

Our defensive record will inevitably improve with Darmian, a fully fit Shaw and Schneiderlin and it's entirely possible that alone will close that 5 goal gap, so it's pretty clear we don't need another CB. If we want to compete in the CL then maybe we do, but that's something to think about next season. Our problem is our goalscoring.

Only two teams have won the PL by scoring less than 70 goals - United in 08/09, and Arsenal in 97/98, both with 68 goals. We managed just 62 last season and realistically need to find another 10 goals to have any real chance of competing. We should be competing with City for De Bruyne and Arsenal for Benzema, not City for Otamendi.

Couldn't agree more.
 
Our defensive record will inevitably improve with Darmian, a fully fit Shaw and Schneiderlin and it's entirely possible that alone will close that 5 goal gap, so it's pretty clear we don't need another CB. If we want to compete in the CL then maybe we do, but that's something to think about next season. Our problem is our goalscoring.
I disagree with this statement mate. How many times were we ripped open last season and had count on a last ditch save by DDG? DDG is currently not playing, and most prob is off, but he'll be a huge loss and our new signings won't out-way the void DDG will leave IMO.
 
I disagree with this statement mate. How many times were we ripped open last season and had count on a last ditch save by DDG? DDG is currently not playing, and most prob is off, but he'll be a huge loss and our new signings won't out-way the void DDG will leave IMO.
It seems to me DDG is probably saying and our signings will probably out-way the void, if he leaves, a bit compared to last season.
 
The funny thing is that the things being said about Otamendi now are more or less exactly what people said about Mangala last summer. People just like to moan and indulge in hysterics.

Last year our defence wasn't a big issue. Less than 1 goal a game in the league is fine. We were one goal off having the 2nd best defensive record in the league. City won the league with the exact same defensive record as us in 13/14 (37 goals conceded) and we had an even worse defensive record when we last won it in 12/13. Last season Chelsea conceded just 5 more goals.

Our defensive record will inevitably improve with Darmian, a fully fit Shaw and Schneiderlin and it's entirely possible that alone will close that 5 goal gap, so it's pretty clear we don't need another CB. If we want to compete in the CL then maybe we do, but that's something to think about next season. Our problem is our goalscoring.

Only two teams have won the PL by scoring less than 70 goals - United in 08/09, and Arsenal in 97/98, both with 68 goals. We managed just 62 last season and realistically need to find another 10 goals to have any real chance of competing. We should be competing with City for De Bruyne and Arsenal for Benzema, not City for Otamendi.
Could not agree more. For some reason a lot of United fans have been screaming for some defenders when our attack is in dire need of strengthening.
 
You're putting it like in most games oponnent had 5 or 6 big chances with our defense just looking and DDG saving all of them. And it wasnt like that. In some games our defense was just good and in some oponnents had few chances.

I'm saying that De Gea is the main reason our defensive record was good on paper last season, because he was.

Who's blaming everyone else? It's fact that we suffered injuries all season, or do you purposely leave out facts
As for saying injuries not altering the huge flaws in the CBs clearly shows your naivety when it come to football.

Being thick as pig shit positionally like Jones and Rojo or a complete deer in the headlights like Evans can't be blamed on injuries, a kid in McNair came in and often looked more composed, and Smalling suffered injuries and set backs but actually being a decent defender he still managed the basics when returning, so eiother you are naive or wearing red specs if you don't see an issue with our CB options.
 
One injury to Smalling, which will inevitably happen, and we have no real defender in there. We look good for now, but that can change quickly.

Some miss the point. It is not particularly about Otamendi, but buying a new CB. We need one and we want one, going for the best available option makes sense. I cant see us buying any other CB, that is better and would improve us. Alone the fact that van Gaal wants to improve that area tells me we need to improve it too. What Pedro is to Bale, Otamendi is to Ramos. Just because we cant get our number 1, it doesnt mean we should buy no one when we have to improve there.
 
It seems to me DDG is probably saying and our signings will probably out-way the void, if he leaves, a bit compared to last season.
Well the thing is Brwnd is bringing up old defensive records and using those as a reason we'll improve with our new signings, but DDG was a major factor in those records. The guy was a beast and he will leave a huge hole.

Everyone said last season that we needed to sign a CB, and for me this is still the case. Blind playing there says it all really and although he hasn't put a foot wrong as of yet, that isn't his position and shouldn't be a long term fix.
 
I disagree with this statement mate. How many times were we ripped open last season and had count on a last ditch save by DDG? DDG is currently not playing, and most prob is off, but he'll be a huge loss and our new signings won't out-way the void DDG will leave IMO.

He made less than 3 saves per game last season. A lot of them were spectacular and vital saves, no question about that, but the frequency with which we were cut apart by the opposition is being dramatically overblown here. Van Gaal made the same point just before Christmas last season too - there was a lot of talk about our inadequate centre backs but he thought they performed and developed quite well. I think the same. Smalling, Jones, Rojo and Blind are good enough. Otamendi's an improvement but not one that justifies €40m at his age. Ramos is a big enough improvement to justify it and gives us the ball-playing defender that we lack but Otamendi isn't a significant improvement and doesn't fit the system.
 
I disagree with this statement mate. How many times were we ripped open last season and had count on a last ditch save by DDG? DDG is currently not playing, and most prob is off, but he'll be a huge loss and our new signings won't out-way the void DDG will leave IMO.
There's a reason why his highlight reel slowed down when we ditched 3 at the back
 
Could not agree more. For some reason a lot of United fans have been screaming for some defenders when our attack is in dire need of strengthening.

No, not at all, it's clear we need both ends of the pitch strengthening and you can see most get this given how active the Pedro thread is along with the "We desperately need a striker" thread and how people jump into the Bale or Muller threads at the merest crumb of phony hope, I don't see where the idea comes from that it can only be one or the other.
 
Well the thing is Brwnd is bringing up old defensive records and using those as a reason we'll improve with our new signings, but DDG was a major factor in those records. The guy was a beast and he will leave a huge hole.

Everyone said last season that we needed to sign a CB, and for me this is still the case. Blind playing there says it all really and although he hasn't put a foot wrong as of yet, that isn't his position and shouldn't be a long term fix.
As I said having a better midfield which protects the defense will help that same defense. And I expect DDG to stay.
 
He made less than 3 saves per game last season. A lot of them were spectacular and vital saves, no question about that, but the frequency with which we were cut apart by the opposition is being dramatically overblown here. Van Gaal made the same point just before Christmas last season too - there was a lot of talk about our inadequate centre backs but he thought they performed and developed quite well. I think the same. Smalling, Jones, Rojo and Blind are good enough. Otamendi's an improvement but not one that justifies €40m at his age. Ramos is a big enough improvement to justify it but Otamendi's just not.
Nah, I don't think I am being that dramatic tbh. I feel we were opened up too much last season and DDG 3 saves a game saved us from having a much worse defensive record.

If LvG was happy about our CB's brwnd, why is Blind suddenly playing there now?
 
He'll be a better option for them than Mangala though. Sure, Mangala has been good in the first 2 games but Otamendi was a top 3 CB in La Liga last season with great performances against Real and Barca so he is clearly on another level compared to Mangala. Very sensible signing for them.
 
Its all fine to go on about how good our defense is now that we are winning,but its just been two games, its always the extreme in here depending on results..If there is one thing that we can almost be certain of each season is that our defense will go through its annual injury ravaged period..It happens every year without fail...I think Otamendi is a good defender and would have loved him here..yes, our midfield will improve us, but that has also come at a cost of stifling our attacking play..When we need to be more attacking, a strong defense would be brilliant..Im not convinced by Blind especially against big and physical strikers..He's got a good football brain, but I believe we can get a better defender in...But we'll see...

If we get injuries to some of the key players in our midfield our defense may be reason for concern again especially if DDG goes.
 
As I said having a better midfield which protects the defense will help that same defense. And I expect DDG to stay.
Of course and tbh I get what brawnd said regarding Darmain, because as soon as Valencia come of the other week we were opened up straight away. I just feel our new signings won't make up for the loss of DDG (if he goes that is).
 
I read Valencia still owe City money from the Negredo deal last summer, so the surplus is probably that being written off.

Oh, I see. Makes sense then.

If they add De Bruyne to Sterling and Otamendi, they've got a seriously good squad.

Bit surprised their loaning out Mangala, thought it would have made sense to just get rid of MDM.
 
No, not at all, it's clear we need both ends of the pitch strengthening and you can see most get this given how active the Pedro thread is along with the "We desperately need a striker" thread and how people jump into the Bale or Muller threads at the merest crumb of phony hope, I don't see where the idea comes from that it can only be one or the other.
Wasn't necessarily talking about RedCafe. Just United fans in general, especially the morons on Twitter.

It would be lovely to have both sure, but for me the attack is a much bigger priority.
 
Oh, I see. Makes sense then.

If they add De Bruyne to Sterling and Otamendi, they've got a seriously good squad.

Bit surprised their loaning out Mangala, thought it would have made sense to just get rid of MDM.

According to Ian Ladyman, they're not looking to loan him out, so who knows.
 
Wasn't necessarily talking about RedCafe. Just United fans in general, especially the morons on Twitter.

It would be lovely to have both sure, but for me the attack is a much bigger priority.

The thing is we can only get what we can get, the Pedro deal has been as arduous as I can recall, and we simply can't get the top options for forwards we'd all like. In Otamendi though there was a CB ready to go that was an upgrade over what we have.
 
Nah, I don't think I am being that dramatic tbh. I feel we were opened up too much last season and DDG 3 saves a game saved us from having a much worse defensive record.

If LvG was happy about our CB's brwnd, why is Blind suddenly playing there now?

Do you really think that we won't be opened up less this season, even if we don't sign another CB? It's taken a while to get there but it seems pretty clear we're now a very organised team under van Gaal and all of the players understand and execute their roles when out of possession very well, IMO.

Blind is playing there because he's aggressive, a good tackler, uses the ball very well and reads the game very well. He's played most of his career as a defender for club and country so I'm not sure I understand why that decision has received so much derision. In a compact team with an aggressive defensive approach he's a very effective defender and orchestrates our play from the build-up very well.

The other side of it is that Rojo's still regaining his fitness after coming back late to pre-season and Jones is ill. None of these things are indications that he's unhappy with our defenders as far as I can tell. In an ideal world we'd have someone who combines Blind's and Smalling's strengths but Otamendi can't replace what Blind offers us. Ramos can but he's one of the few and unfortunately he's not available.
 
You're probably right, but then again what if Ramos had ended up joining United? Would he have replaced Smalling and played alongside Blind? For some reason I doubt that. As for Otamendi, like with any player - I can't be too disappointed as he's only really had one stand out season as well as the probability that we have decided not to pursue him any further.

No way of knowing but I feel Ramos would have partnered Smalling. He plays on the left and is very comfortable there.
 
Not too bothered. Ridiculous price for a 27.5 year old who was bought for 12m Euros last season and has only had one good season in a big league.

Prefer someone younger in Stones, Lapor or Varane, anyway.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.