Nicolas Gaitan

As this thread replaced the bumped NG transfer thread which was locked, it doesn't take a genius to work out that it a transfer discussion - that & the fact that you are in the 'Transfer Forum'. :lol:

No one else seems to have been confused Adzzz?
Ive no idea what this thread is about - OP needs some explanation at least.
 
To be fair, I was a little annoyed at the lack of information in the op.. I had read the tweets and opened the thread so I got what you were going for.. But just because its the transfer thread doesnt mean its a given that everyone opening the thread should know what the portuguese paper is repoeting re: Gaitan

Then they have to wade through all the comments to understand what the hell is going on. Posting the link to the article or even the tweets in the op would have made it easier for everyone which is what @Rado_N was going for imo

I take your reasoned & level headed point Sid. Maybe i was asking a bit much, in supposing that every United fan on here realised there were on going, (years) of rumours surrounding NG & United & that a thread, in the Transfer Forum, entitled, "Nicolas Gaitan - Rumour or rubbish" could have been interpreted in any other way, other than,

Nicolas Gaitan - Rumour or rubbish? - discuss.

To reiterate, I did believe the thread title, spoke for itself. I wasn't quoting sources or claiming personal knowledge, I was simply asking, did people give any weight to the latest, round of 'Rumours' or, did people regard the latest reports, as 'Rubbish'

I'll have to be more careful in future :rolleyes:
 
Seems to have a bit more momentum than in previous years, this rumour. The quoted price seems reasonable but it would effectively end any hope of landing Bale. And Bale would be funnier.
 
Ive no idea what this thread is about - OP needs some explanation at least.
You didn't know that we have been persistently linked to this player & that the rumours which may or may not, be rubbish, have resurfaced in the last few hours?

You've no idea what this thread is about, despite having just read "As this thread replaced the bumped NG transfer thread which was locked, it doesn't take a genius to work out that it a transfer discussion - that & the fact that you are in the 'Transfer Forum'."

Really?
 
no chance, watched a youtube compilation, he's shite. and thats fact because ive watched 4 minutes of his highlights.
 
I take your reasoned & level headed point Sid. Maybe i was asking a bit much, in supposing that every United fan on here realised there were on going, (years) of rumours surrounding NG & United & that a thread, in the Transfer Forum, entitled, "Nicolas Gaitan - Rumour or rubbish" could have been interpreted in any other way, other than,

Nicolas Gaitan - Rumour or rubbish? - discuss.

To reiterate, I did believe the thread title, spoke for itself. I wasn't quoting sources or claiming personal knowledge, I was simply asking, did people give any weight to the latest, round of 'Rumours' or, did people regard the latest reports, as 'Rubbish'

I'll have to be more careful in future :rolleyes:
Like you mentioned yourself the problem is that the Gaitan rumors have been going on for so long.. How does anyone know for sure you are focusing on the reports linking us to Gaitan from the past few hours?

One could look at the thread and assume someone just bumped an old thread re: Gaitan.
 
Well done, Nozzy & Co. You've managed to make the most boring part of a Nicolas Gaitan transfer thread not Nicolas Gaitan.
 
Surprisingly we didnt get linked with Garay so far, in need of a CB he would be the optimal target for the papers.
 
Like you mentioned yourself the problem is that the Gaitan rumors have been going on for so long.. How does anyone know for sure you are focusing on the reports linking us to Gaitan from the past few hours?

One could look at the thread and assume someone just bumped an old thread re: Gaitan.

Well, I would hope that one look at the Transfer Forum, would see that the NG bumped thread was locked. One read of the final mod. post in that thread would see that in part, it was closed due to the whim of a mod. who didn't like the source. Fine, the source is garbage, we all know that but as others have since mentioned & as I was attempting to point out, by starting the new thread, there was more than source - all suspect but non the less, many.

If I was remiss in not giving a more thorough title, I apologise. However, on the point of not including links to further sources, that was the whole point, namely, are the continuing & gathering stories on this player, rumours or rubbish - I was asking the question? By quoting sources I would be open to accusations of giving them credence, when I was merely asking others their opinion & in doing so, offering the chance for others comment on the latest round of multiple sourced stories which, the mod, had denied, by locking the original thread.
 
Reading around:

Mendes wants valencia to reduce otamendi fee.
Valencia president calls mendes a c**t.
Mendes leaks that gaitan, linked with valencia, is 80% set to go to united.
 
i think it could just be mendes leaking the story so valencia pay a few extra quid.. i dont see why we need gaitan unless di maria is on the way out..
 
Well, I would hope that one look at the Transfer Forum, would see that the NG bumped thread was locked. One read of the final mod. post in that thread would see that in part, it was closed due to the whim of a mod. who didn't like the source. Fine, the source is garbage, we all know that but as others have since mentioned & as I was attempting to point out, by starting the new thread, there was more than source - all suspect but non the less, many.

If I was remiss in not giving a more thorough title, I apologise. However, on the point of not including links to further sources, that was the whole point, namely, are the continuing & gathering stories on this player, rumours or rubbish - I was asking the question? By quoting sources I would be open to accusations of giving them credence, when I was merely asking others their opinion & in doing so, offering the chance for others comment on the latest round of multiple sourced stories which, the mod, had denied, by locking the original thread.
Are you genuinely stupid or are you just being difficult?

The other thread was locked because it was a year old megathread, not because of the legitimacy of the source.

The issue with this thread has been the lack of quoted sources in the OP.

It's not difficult to grasp. If you start a thread, cite your sources in the OP.

No, it is not sufficient that a locked thread was on the front page when you made it, because it soon won't be and you're opening a new discussion, you can't be reliant on everyone having seen something else, nor can you expect people to have to take to Google to find your sources.
 
As a playmaker he's weaker than Mata...

As a winger he's weaker than Mata...

As a simple player he's weaker than Mata.

Why would we splash 30M for him when we are quite stocked in this areas ? (Too many number 10s, 4 or 5 wingers now)

And IF this rumour is true, then I don't understand anything about LVG's policy
 
As a playmaker he's weaker than Mata...

As a winger he's weaker than Mata...

As a simple player he's weaker than Mata.

Why would we splash 30M for him when we are quite stocked in this areas ? (Too many number 10s, 4 or 5 wingers now)

And IF this rumour is true, then I don't understand anything about LVG's policy

I doubt its true, BUT I reckon we may sign another winger.
 
Are you genuinely stupid or are you just being difficult?

The other thread was locked because it was a year old megathread, not because of the legitimacy of the source.

The issue with this thread has been the lack of quoted sources in the OP.

It's not difficult to grasp. If you start a thread, cite your sources in the OP.

No, it is not sufficient that a locked thread was on the front page when you made it, because it soon won't be and you're opening a new discussion, you can't be reliant on everyone having seen something else, nor can you expect people to have to take to Google to find your sources.

To quote you "Don't bump old megathreads, either start a new one or better yet when the source is this crap just don't bother." You closed the other thread, in part, because the source was crap.

You still don't comprehend the title of the thread. It was asking a question about the rumours - pretty simple. I didn't include the further sources because I myself, didn't particularly think they held any weight. If I'd have included sources this would no doubt have been interpreted as support from me, for the rumours. Any clearer?

You've displayed internet trolling behavior from the very off & now, a very thin skin, when you've been taken to task for your trolling. Is straight forward pi$$ taking the remit of a moderator? It would appear from your initial comments that you consider it moderators privilege.

Have you been doing this too long?
 
To quote you "Don't bump old megathreads, either start a new one or better yet when the source is this crap just don't bother." You closed the other thread, in part, because the source was crap.

You still don't comprehend the title of the thread. It was asking a question about the rumours - pretty simple. I didn't include the further sources because I myself, didn't particularly think they held any weight. If I'd have included sources this would no doubt have been interpreted as support from me, for the rumours. Any clearer?

You've displayed internet trolling behavior from the very off & now, a very thin skin, when you've been taken to task for your trolling. Is straight forward pi$$ taking the remit of a moderator? It would appear from your initial comments that you consider it moderators privilege.

Have you been doing this too long?
You're beginning to make my brain itch.

I closed the thread because it was bumped from 12 months ago, I then offered two options as an alternative to bumping old threads, one of which was not to bother because the source was crap.

You've been told multiple times now that you should have included the sources you wished to discuss in the OP, this is not a debate. This is you being told you've done it wrong.

The fact that you think I'm trolling you would be funny if it wasn't so outright mental.

I think you should just avoid making new threads.

I'm done talking to you know, I can't take any more of it.
 
You're beginning to make my brain itch.

I closed the thread because it was bumped from 12 months ago, I then offered two options as an alternative to bumping old threads, one of which was not to bother because the source was crap.

You've been told multiple times now that you should have included the sources you wished to discuss in the OP, this is not a debate. This is you being told you've done it wrong.

The fact that you think I'm trolling you would be funny if it wasn't so outright mental.

I think you should just avoid making new threads.

I'm done talking to you know, I can't take any more of it.

Which is what you as a moderator should have done a long time ago & let proper contributions fill the thread, from the many people who want to discuss the issue, rather than 'the rules'.
 
I doubt its true, BUT I reckon we may sign another winger.

I'm not so sure of that. Unless we lure Bale or Ronaldo I can't see us adding another body there

Young had a terrific season
As far as I know, Di Maria is still there
Mata is playing a false winger role
Depay is a good talent and will be with us
Januzaj, even if he suffered, is still part of the team
You can add Valencia playing there, if we do sign a proper RB
 
Which is what you as a moderator should have done a long time ago & let proper contributions fill the thread, from the many people who want to discuss the issue, rather than 'the rules'.
I think you're on your own with this one mate! The only contributions to this thread (other than your odd argument) have been that this story is bullshit and no one wants him.

If everyone started a new thread to discuss the credibility of each bullshit rumour, it would be horrendous wading through the shite to find the few stories that may have some truth in them.
 
I think you're on your own with this one mate! The only contributions to this thread (other than your odd argument) have been that this story is bullshit and no one wants him.

If everyone started a new thread to discuss the credibility of each bullshit rumour, it would be horrendous wading through the shite to find the few stories that may have some truth in them.
Not to worry, I won't be doing it again.
 
You didn't know that we have been persistently linked to this player & that the rumours which may or may not, be rubbish, have resurfaced in the last few hours?

You've no idea what this thread is about, despite having just read "As this thread replaced the bumped NG transfer thread which was locked, it doesn't take a genius to work out that it a transfer discussion - that & the fact that you are in the 'Transfer Forum'."

Really?

You can't understand that writing a thread title without an explanatory OP is confusing? Particularly people who dont know that you are referencing another thread that they havent read?

Really?
 
Ive never quite understood his position. Is he a #10 a wide midfielder or a winger?

Seems to be a bit of everything. Hes played mostly as a left winger/left forward this season.
 
I'm not so sure of that. Unless we lure Bale or Ronaldo I can't see us adding another body there

Young had a terrific season
As far as I know, Di Maria is still there
Mata is playing a false winger role
Depay is a good talent and will be with us
Januzaj, even if he suffered, is still part of the team
You can add Valencia playing there, if we do sign a proper RB

I think he'll be on loan, and Mata is a strange one, I can see his role changing once the midfield is sured up. Thats why I said I can see it happening (unless we keep Nani).
 
I've seen some bit of him and he is not that bad, i would go as far as saying he is a couple of levels higher than Young.
 
I for one am disappointed that I didn't get to see yet another Gaitan thread where everyone lols about how we are linked to him every year.

How could you @Rado_N, how could you.
 
:lol: This again. :wenger:

Has this guy ever been a target, I don't think so. I've never even seen him play or being talked about outside of these random links to United. I'm convinced it's Benfica leaking this to the press until we actually buy the fecker.
 
Rubbish, I hope. If he was any good you would think a big Spanish/Italian side would have been all over him by now. Also how many appearances has he made for Benfica and would you say that was good for someone who is his age?