Baker Mayfield covid infections with OBJ in the line-up: 0
Baker Mayfield covid infections since OBJ left: 1
Plus I think there is still this “I am part of a cool niche elite who understand the NFL and don’t just think it’s Rugby” mentality which unites us as fans of the sport rather than just fans of our teams.
This is true. If I sense someone is really into the NFL I immediately make the assumption that you at least have the capacity to interpret advanced and adjusted stats which already makes me think higher of you than the average football-minded Englishman who downs 20 pints* before a 3pm game and is in the stands in December without a fecking shirt on.
* Which of course is impressive in its own right and nothing to be scoffed at, don't get me wrong.
I do love numbers but I have no idea how you knew thatWho the F are you? Was I even talking to you? Who do you support anyway? Oh the 49ers? Oh look at me, I support the 49ers and I love numbers. Pythagoras fanboy
Ok I’ll stop now please don’t thread ban me
I had a similar experience for one of the games I went to see - Pats @ Jets. The Jets guys I was sitting next to were amazed I knew why the Jets were shitThis reminds me of when we went to see the Broncos play at Mile High. We got in the Uber heading downtown earlier in the day and we’ve obviously got jerseys on etc.
Guy hears my accent and you could immediately tell he’d written us off as day-tripping tourists who know nothing, until I started talking his ear off about the players we’d drafted that year and how exciting the roster was but Vance Joseph seemed like a bluffer and the Chiefs were looking unbeatable and the speed they had on offence was scary blah blah blah.
By the time we got out of the car it was like we were best mates
I do love numbers but I have no idea how you knew that
I kind of hate it already.
It's a film based on a brief period in Sean Payton's life when he was banned from coaching.
Come on, thats something you learn in school even in GermanyI had a similar experience for one of the games I went to see - Pats @ Jets. The Jets guys I was sitting next to were amazed I knew why the Jets were shit
Yeah probably says more about what they think of is Brit fans than anything else!Come on, thats something you learn in school even in Germany
Tbf everyone knows thatI had a similar experience for one of the games I went to see - Pats @ Jets. The Jets guys I was sitting next to were amazed I knew why the Jets were shit
You’re actually a thug, always putting me downTbf everyone knows that
You’re actually a thug, always putting me down
I actually come here to talk about American sports, as the old boards I frequented broke up or became too toxic.How is it that in the NFL thread everyone is so nice to each other . Are you all good people or just good at pretending to be nice . Need drama like f1 to spice it up
can’t really argue with folks who think stafford, mayfield are good qbs.
Both of them are average qbs. The only difference between them is stafford knows how to pad his stats really well.
Stafford is miles better than Mayfield. There are "good" QBs, like Stafford, and then there are "very good" QBs, and then there are "elite" QBs. Mayfield would be in that average/below average category IMO.
I agree he is better than Mayfield. But that isn’t saying much.Stafford is a much better passer and overall QB. Just because you dislike him doesn't discount the fact he's a far better QB than Mayfield.
This goes without saying. Stafford is putting up elite numbers this year - only Brady has more yards (barely) and Rodgers a better rating (again just barely). Mayfield is light years behind these three in all key stat categories.
This goes without saying. Stafford is putting up elite numbers this year - only Brady has more yards (barely) and Rodgers a better rating (again just barely). Mayfield is light years behind these three in all key stat categories.
Then how would you measure or judge him if you disregard passing yards, his QB rating, his 33-9 TD:INT ratio or his 9-4 record?Yeah, he is good at padding stats. Which was my point.
@RobinLFC his entire time at Detriot was him being a terrible under pressure and throwing like crazy when it came to the 4th quarter.
What does that even mean? If a QB is improving his stat line in the 4th quarter then he’s playing well in crunch time.Yeah, he is good at padding stats. Which was my point.
@RobinLFC his entire time at Detriot was him being utter shite for most of the game and throwing like crazy when it came to the 4th quarter. That’s not a good qb, just someone good at padding his stats.
Garbage time tdsWhat does that even mean? If a QB is improving his stat line in the 4th quarter then he’s playing well in crunch time.
Sean Mcvay doesn’t allow him to throw like he used to when he was in detroit. He has gotten better at managing games. Still sucks under pressure. But him being on an amazing team and better coaching always helps.Then how would you measure or judge him if you disregard passing yards, his QB rating, his 33-9 TD:INT ratio or his 9-4 record?
I'd turn the argument of your last sentence around and say that his entire time in Detroit was him being surrounded by terrible teammates bar one receiver and often times him keeping them close regardless. Before this season he had 31 4th Q comebacks since he came into the league in 2009, trailing only Brady and Big Ben. In 2016 alone he had 8 of those (they went 9-7). Now they've put him in a good team with good supporting cast and good coaching for only one season and he's near the top of the league in every statistical category and team record.
Like I said: not elite but definitely good. Can't even be argued against imo.
Sean Mcvay doesn’t allow him to throw like he used to when he was in detroit. He has gotten better at managing games. Still sucks under pressure. But him being on an amazing team and better coaching always helps.
Those stats are similar to stats like yards per carry. Pretty useless.How do these four unrelated statements advance your argument in any way when stacked up against the actual numbers ?
He's 2nd in passing, 2nd in QB rating in a league that features Brady, Rodgers, Mahomes, Jackson and others.
Stafford is performing in the upper echelon of all NFL QBs, as well as significantly higher than Goff during their Super Bowl year.
I know it's not saying much, but A) sucks in NY right now, B) sucks in Jacksonville right now, C) not better off than under Stafford in Detroit right now. Their defense hasn't helped them either and their coaching was atrocious (Jim Caldwell was decent but they made the playoffs under him, the less said about Patricia the better). It wasn't the worst of circumstances in the league, but certainly not a good situation either imo.@RobinLFC come on he had good weapons while in Detroit. Kenny Golladay, Marvin Jones, TJ Hockenson to name a few. I find it hard to blame his teammates tbh.
This debate is so bizarre. On the one hand we started off comparing a Stafford to Mayfield which is a joke because Mayfield is nowhere near as good.
And now we are debating if Stafford is elite, which is also a joke because he just isn’t.
Stafford is a top 15 QB, perhaps sneaks in to the top 10. Better than average, but not elite. Overall, very good.
You’d think we were debating two important players or teams, or a contentious call. Nope, just fecking Stafford and fecking MayfieldWhat did I start ffs
But you don’t ever just go by the numbers. Previous years are important. The eye test is important. Context is important. Sure all of that creates subjectivity, and I get that. So for example if someone had Stafford as say 7-10 in the league I could live with it. If someone said he was 12-16 I could live with it. I have him at 11 so I’m accounting for subjectivity. But elite for me is like top 5. And mayfield is as far down as 20-25 if not lower. So, in my opinion, in very different spectrums to where I have him which is why I find it quite odd.You can only go by the number's he's producing this year, which are top 2 in the league in two key categories.
But you don’t ever just go by the numbers. Previous years are important. The eye test is important. Context is important. Sure all of that creates subjectivity, and I get that. So for example if someone had Stafford as say 7-10 in the league I could live with it. If someone said he was 12-16 I could live with it. I have him at 11 so I’m accounting for subjectivity. But elite for me is like top 5. And mayfield is as far down as 20-25 if not lower. So, in my opinion, in very different spectrums to where I have him which is why I find it quite odd.
Agree with the entire post except for the bolded part. If you have e.g. Brady, Rodgers, Mahomes, Allen and Kyler, that's a (subjective) top 5. No one will convince me that Wilson or Lamar are not a elite QBs (and I guess Herbert and Burrow within this and 2 years as well but maybe then Brady and Rodgers are already gone). Dak is on the verge of that list right now, but I doubt he can ever truly make that next step.But you don’t ever just go by the numbers. Previous years are important. The eye test is important. Context is important. Sure all of that creates subjectivity, and I get that. So for example if someone had Stafford as say 7-10 in the league I could live with it. If someone said he was 12-16 I could live with it. I have him at 11 so I’m accounting for subjectivity. But elite for me is like top 5. And mayfield is as far down as 20-25 if not lower. So, in my opinion, in very different spectrums to where I have him which is why I find it quite odd.
Disagree twice. Results are a team's stat so only a part of a QB's evaluation. And previous years of course count when evaluating a player, you can't say a player is elite if he has 10 awful years and one good season. Nick Foles was never elite because he had 5 great games and won a Super Bowl MVP.Results are more important than any of these things. Previous years are irrelevant because they're in the past.