Rado_N
Yaaas Broncos!
Oh god not this again.
I don't think he cares about the yards & TDs record, it's all about getting another ring. In that regard, I don't think he's bothered about the records he set in yesterday's game, all that mattered was he lost.
Reckon he will call it quits within the next 2 seasons. As great as he was this season, father time is undefeated.
Cumulative stats are garbage, who cares. The guy has played good football in the biggest moments. He's already in the HOF, no-one cares about those stats except weirdos.I'm sure he cares about getting another ring. Who doesn't ? But in Brady's case, since he has more than anyone else (except Charles Haley), I get the impression he would like to finish his career where he is as high on the yards and TD ranking as possible. He knows he is closing in on Manning and Favre's numbers and could potentially catch Manning either next year or definitely the year after on TDs and pass both him and Favre on yards the next year (although Brees is slightly ahead in that regard).
Cumulative stats are garbage, who cares. The guy has played good football in the biggest moments. He's already in the HOF, no-one cares about those stats except weirdos.
Cumulative stats are garbage, who cares. The guy has played good football in the biggest moments. He's already in the HOF, no-one cares about those stats except weirdos.
You are easily the weirdest American sport follower that I have seen, the things you write.
He's applying European style cynicism of stats to American sports as if they are one in the same. In the states, statistics are analyzed and referenced far more commonly in the big three sports than Europeans do with their footy. NFL/MLB/NBA players are constantly analyzed based on their statistical numbers.
Has he? Lets recap. That snow game and the tuck rule. He got seriously lucky in that game and Vinatieri bailed him out and the year after. Then he lost twice to the Giants and again yesterday he choked.So SB performances alone he is 4 good and 4 bad. someone bite ma'feckersThe guy has played good football in the biggest moments.
I'd argue the fascination of glory, legacy, and stats is more weird. Season-by-season stats are one thing, but cumulative stats are worse - they just reflect longevity.You are easily the weirdest American sport follower that I have seen, the things you write.
Guess what, if Manning didn't break that meaningless record he'd still be regarded as the better QB. Past a certain threshold, cumulative stats hold almost no weight.Tell that to Manning, who stuck around just long enough to catch Favre's all time record by a mere 100 yards. These players know that the big stats in their respective positions matter and all of them want to be first. Brady and Brees are going to keep playing until they are alone at the top.
I'd argue the fascination of glory, legacy, and stats is more weird. Season-by-season stats are one thing, but cumulative stats are worse - they just reflect longevity.
1 wasn't itGreat game yesterday!! Saw very few punts and if I'm right, Patriots didn't have a single punt. How many punts in total were there?
Great game yesterday!! Saw very few punts and if I'm right, Patriots didn't have a single punt. How many punts in total were there?
His pose after he lost to the Giants was even better. It was even closer to Terry's. Look up Tom Bradying.I made myself something to look at whenever I have a bad day
Guess what, if Manning didn't break that meaningless record he'd still be regarded as the better QB. Past a certain threshold, cumulative stats hold almost no weight.
His pose after he lost to the Giants was even better. It was even closer to Terry's. Look up Tom Bradying.
1 wasn't it
Was more throws to QBs than punts or something
I made myself something to look at whenever I have a bad day
The scary part of last night is the Pats came uncomfortably close with the final hair mary to go 90 yards in less than a minute.
Not very well, mitigating circumstances surrounding player statistics are almost never brought up. Stats give you a ballpark idea if a player is good or not, but can't tell much more due to coaches/supporting cast fuzziness. I stand by this, despite thinking perhaps the most statistically impressive QB ever is also the best ever to play. Stats aren't what they are cracked up to be.Which is kind of important, stats in America are a serious thing, they don't just look at raw stats, they are analyzed and put into context.
Not very well, mitigating circumstances surrounding player statistics are almost never brought up. Stats give you a ballpark idea if a player is good or not, but can't tell much more due to coaches/supporting cast fuzziness. I stand by this, despite thinking perhaps the most statistically impressive QB ever is also the best ever to play. Stats aren't what they are cracked up to be.
I don't totally disagree, but by 'what you've done' I think along the lines of ability, not on what your coaching staff and teammates allow you to achieve stats/rings wise.Mitigating circumstances are irrelevant. At the end of the day, you can only be judged on what you have actually done, not on what you could have done if circumstances were different.
They pretty much are. No one else really plays the sport do they? Canada has a league but nowhere near the quality of the NFL.
I honestly think that could be the end of the Pats window. Brady simply can't defy time for much longer, rumours about Gronk retiring, Butler will be leaving for definite now, both coordinators gone, incredibly weak linebacker core minus Hightower.
Brady has covered up a lost of weaknesses for a long time.
The scary part of last night is the Pats came uncomfortably close with the final hair mary to go 90 yards in less than a minute.
I guess we'll never know
But no way that benching Butler can be a simple footballing decision based on personnel, even more so when Rowe was struggling in the first half. Makes me wonder what it was, contract related for next season with him being a free agent. Off field issue? discipline?
I am just not having it's simply match-up related
I still think the last two throws should have been hail mary throws instead of the last one alone. Anything could happen with those. They could have got a pass interference call and advanced up the field.Had Hogan hauled in that first pass attempt, think he was around the 35 or so, who knows how the rest of that drive would have went. Most likely a much closer final attempt, or possibly a very late TD setting up the two to tie.
Do you think they were close enough for Brady to reach the endzone? I think they had some doubts in his arm strength.I still think the last two throws should have been hail mary throws instead of the last one alone. Anything could happen with those. They could have got a pass interference call and advanced up the field.
His last throw reached the end zone. The pass before that was incomplete so he would have been in the same position to begin with.Do you think they were close enough for Brady to reach the endzone? I think they had some doubts in his arm strength.
I still think the last two throws should have been hail mary throws instead of the last one alone. Anything could happen with those. They could have got a pass interference call and advanced up the field.
Yeah they missed that pass interference call. I was sure they were going to call it at that time. For once the refs didnt call for the Pats. A bone head play from that Eagles defender.True that. Did you notice an Eagles DB intentionally hit/cleared out a Pats receiver downfield around the 20/25 on the hail mary? Blatant PI/illegal contact beyond the line of scrimmage. Surprised that wasn't called considering it happened in plain sight. I understand letting that stuff go down around the end zone area on those throws but when it's so blatant in the open field and knocking a player off his route it has to be called.