Revan are you really using Chelsea as an example on how a clubs transfer policy is run. They have how many players on loan every year? They always sell well because they have had a system set up for a long time and we have only just started with a DoF. They buy well and they sell well, of course not every transfer works out but a lot more of those have than ours have post Fergie.
Well, yeah. Your point was that he hasn't been backed as much as Chelsea managers, which I think was a false point, considering the money he has spent.
Here is a list of first teamers bought or loaned under Lampard/Tuchel
Mendy
Werner
Havertz
Ziyech
Niguez
Silva
Pulisic
Lukaku
Chilwell.
And here is one of Ole: Maguire, AWB, James, Bruno, DVB, Telles, Ronaldo, Cavani, Varane, Sancho, and a few expensive teenagers he does not play.
That was added to a squad already containing
Kante,
Kovacic
Jorginho
Kepa
Azpilecueta
Alonso
Mount
while Ole had a squad that had finished above Chelsea the season he took it. Containing back then the best GK in the world, Pogba, promising talents like Rashford and Martial to name a few.
They had a proper base to build on. Ole didnt have that. The amount spent by united or the net spend is a bad argument to use
because the club always gets fleeced for players with the odd exception. Chelsea have had a system in place for years and years
that allows them to perform better in the market. Liverpool have it too and City well they can spend what they want.
Even without taking into account the net spent (cause Chelsea sell one million players per year), Ole still spent more than Chelsea managers in his time, as I mentioned in my other post. It was not significantly more, like it is the case with the net spent, but it was still more.
My original point was more about the players bought in rather than the money spent. We have wasted so much money on shite
and finished players that its been a running joke. All of you who criticise Ole can surely at least admit he is attracting better players.,
My issue has been he doesnt get the players he needs in quicker to catch up with everyone else.
Ole is far from blameless but people do not want to give him any credit for the team building he is doing until the control of the Glazers.
I do not think that Ole has bough well. 450m euros spent, I would expect much more than this. 80m for Magure or 55m for AWB, are hardly money spent well. Where are the Robinsons, Salahs or Fabinhos under Ole, players who were not yet mainstream and who performed very well. That is what I think is spent well, what Klopp did, build a top squad under a very constraint budget. What Ole did, was going for the most obvious choices, and overpaying for them. And in case of Sancho, then not playing him.
At best, he has been OK/decent in the transfer market. Which is still better than his predecessors, to be fair.