Next permanent manager | Poll updated

Who should be the next permanent manager?

  • Luis Enrique

    Votes: 113 7.4%
  • Erik ten Hag

    Votes: 1,300 84.7%
  • Julen Lopetegui

    Votes: 10 0.7%
  • Mauricio Pochettino

    Votes: 79 5.1%
  • None of the above

    Votes: 32 2.1%

  • Total voters
    1,534
Status
Not open for further replies.
How can anyone trust Murtough/Fletcher or Arnold to get this right? Like seriously. Murtough, no experience as DOF. Fletcher, no experience as a technical director. Arnold, no experience as a CEO. If the Glazers were serious about this club they would have hired the best out there. You're all being taken for a ride. I have ZERO faith they will get this right. They could hire Pep or Klopp and still feck it up. You might think that's sensationalist but look at what's happened the last ten years. And please don't tell me that the structures are now in place. To some degree they are, but all positions filled with novices and are all under qualified for the job that's at stake.

Everyone's learning on the job.

No wonder we're down the shitter.
 
How can anyone trust Murtough/Fletcher or Arnold to get this right? Like seriously. Murtough, no experience as DOF. Fletcher, no experience as a technical director. Arnold, no experience as a CEO. If the Glazers were serious about this club they would have hired the best out there. You're all being taken for a ride. I have ZERO faith they will get this right. They could hire Pep or Klopp and still feck it up. You might think that's sensationalist but look at what's happened the last ten years. And please don't tell me that the structures are now in place. To some degree they are, but all positions filled with novices and are all under qualified for the job that's at stake.
Hear, hear.
Everyone's learning on the job.

No wonder we're down the shitter.
Murtough is said to have some very good pedigree to be in the role he's in. Richard Arnold is hands off (as he should be) noting that he's not a subject matter expert on the footballing side and delegates this to Murtough.

Murtough & Arnold officially took charge on Feb 1st, so stop getting your knickers in a twist about the 10 years up to that point.
 
How much did Ole and Jose spend in their summers to get to that level, compared to Poch relative to City, Chelsea and Liverpool?

Well yeah, he just about wins the net spend trophy. That year Poch finished second behind Chelsea (2016-17), Chelsea had a net spend of £23m. Spurs had a net spend of £9m.

But that's just the difference between Spurs spunking "only" £17m on Vincent Janssen and Chelsea spunking £33m on Batshuayi. :lol:
 
Whilst I'm much more in favour of ETH, the way this place downplays Poch is unreal. They are both good candidates for where we are currently at.

Ten Hag has a potentially higher ceiling, but isn't proven at the top level. Yes his Ajax side have been great in Europe, but so were Jardims Monaco and he hasn't gone on to great things. Even this season in the league despite their GD being astronomically higher than any competitors it is still a close race, which can only mean his team is prone to off days, albeit that could be put down to the caliber of player.

Poch on the other hand has shown with Spurs that he can build a system on less of a budget than what we'd provide him and make it work. It would be interesting to see what he could do with a bigger budget to spend on players that fit his philosophy, as you can't say that PSG have got a side built how he would choose if given free reign.

Both should take us back to the top 4 in a maximum of 2 seasons, however that guarantee is going to become less and less with City and Liverpool being nailed on for the foreseeable and Chelsea, Arsenal looking strong. Then you have the likes of West Ham and Leicster whilst Newcastle will only get stronger each season now.

I personally prefer Ten Hag, as although I think it might take longer, (I'd expect Poch to get us top 4 next season, whilst ETH may struggle settling in) I think I'd prefer watching us each week a lot more if ETH was a success rather than what I envision a successful Poch United side would look like.

Again though, the complete meltdown that the club might choose to go with Poch is so blown out of proportion. He's a good manager and an upgrade on what we've had over the last 7 years. It's the reason if he doesn't come to United he's likely to go to Madrid after his PSG stint.
 
Ole and Jose managed second place finishes here as well. The only time Poch was in any real danger of actually winning the league was the two horse race against Leicester in which he managed to finish third. He then went on to accomplish the highly impressive achievement of not winning the fecking French league with PSG. Winning it at the second attempt is like taking two tries to successfully find your arse with both hands.

Ten Hag on the other hand, took over an Ajax side that hadn't won the league for four years, won it in his first full season and won it every year since.

"Here". With £70-80m spent on Pogba, Maguire and Lukaku for example. Spurs didn't make a transfer in two windows.
 
Murtough is said to have some very good pedigree to be in the role he's in. Richard Arnold is hands off (as he should be) noting that he's not a subject matter expert on the footballing side and delegates this to Murtough.

Murtough & Arnold officially took charge on Feb 1st, so stop getting your knickers in a twist about the 10 years up to that point.
Yeah he's inexperienced as a DOF but he's qualified for the actual role. He was at Everton for years bringing through youth to taking up a role with the PL before joining United and spearheading a rebuild of the academy. Experience as a DOF doesn't always mean success. There have been plenty of successful directors such as Michael Edwards who had never been in the role before.
 
Whilst I'm much more in favour of ETH, the way this place downplays Poch is unreal. They are both good candidates for where we are currently at.

Spot on. It's one of the weirdest things I've seen on this forum and there have been some weird agendas. Both would be coups to get. Pochettino isn't Rafa Benitez ffs.
 
Spot on. It's one of the weirdest things I've seen on this forum and there have been some weird agendas. Both would be coups to get. Pochettino isn't Rafa Benitez ffs.

Correct. Rafa Benitez won trophies.
 


It's coming, you know it's coming

1) Its Delaney, so probably (hopefully) bs.

2) If true, then the board have already made up their mind on Poch, and finding excuses to discount ETH to soften the blow for fans. I'd just find it amazing that after supposedly a few impressive first round of interviews, they're suddenly less than impressed?
 
Correct. Rafa Benitez won trophies.

Pochettino is about to win a trophy.

Ten Hag on the other hand, took over an Ajax side that hadn't won the league for four years, won it in his first full season and won it every year since.

Frank de Boer won several trophies for Ajax. They've won 35 Dutch leagues in their history, 11 more than the next team. It's basically them or PSV every year.

Look I'm not interested in this weird United culture war. Both are excellent candidates to me, I just don't feel the need to diminish a fine manager's name to prove my point. What's the agenda about? It's just weird.
 
Whilst I'm much more in favour of ETH, the way this place downplays Poch is unreal. They are both good candidates for where we are currently at.

Ten Hag has a potentially higher ceiling, but isn't proven at the top level. Yes his Ajax side have been great in Europe, but so were Jardims Monaco and he hasn't gone on to great things. Even this season in the league despite their GD being astronomically higher than any competitors it is still a close race, which can only mean his team is prone to off days, albeit that could be put down to the caliber of player.

Poch on the other hand has shown with Spurs that he can build a system on less of a budget than what we'd provide him and make it work. It would be interesting to see what he could do with a bigger budget to spend on players that fit his philosophy, as you can't say that PSG have got a side built how he would choose if given free reign.

Both should take us back to the top 4 in a maximum of 2 seasons, however that guarantee is going to become less and less with City and Liverpool being nailed on for the foreseeable and Chelsea, Arsenal looking strong. Then you have the likes of West Ham and Leicster whilst Newcastle will only get stronger each season now.

I personally prefer Ten Hag, as although I think it might take longer, (I'd expect Poch to get us top 4 next season, whilst ETH may struggle settling in) I think I'd prefer watching us each week a lot more if ETH was a success rather than what I envision a successful Poch United side would look like.

Again though, the complete meltdown that the club might choose to go with Poch is so blown out of proportion. He's a good manager and an upgrade on what we've had over the last 7 years. It's the reason if he doesn't come to United he's likely to go to Madrid after his PSG stint.
Great post!

Fans threatening to walk away and saying they would want to see us relegated if he's appointed. Heads have completely gone in the fanbase. :lol: I prefer ten Hag too but the Poch hate is ridiculous at this point.
 
Murtough is said to have some very good pedigree to be in the role he's in. Richard Arnold is hands off (as he should be) noting that he's not a subject matter expert on the footballing side and delegates this to Murtough.

Murtough & Arnold officially took charge on Feb 1st, so stop getting your knickers in a twist about the 10 years up to that point.
What pedigree is that? He's been here for the whole time whilst we've continually regressed. Appointing him and Fletcher was a box ticking exercise. Our future as a club is now in their hands.
 
So nothing of substance to counter with? You really take these articles as gospel truth don't you? Poor soul, you still haven't realized the hope kills you. I'd gladly welcome Hag BTW. I do like his style and approach



How is Poch's football antiquated when his style is based on the high press and quick progression of the ball which most top managers utilize to good effect in the modern game? Poch is more aggressive and attack minded than the more possession based Ten Hag who also primarily uses the same 4-2-3-1 formation Poch goes for. The major difference between them is Hag likes to load the left flank when in attacking positions. Peter Bosz before Ten Hag at Ajax had a more aggressive approach similar to Tuchel, Klopp and the godfather of modern Genpressing Rangknick himself but Hag’s style has yielded more numbers in attack.

All you're saying here is you'd rather give Hag a chance because he's an unknown with a potential for success and Poch is a known quantity 'past his best by date' (incorrectly). You don't seem to be saying much about either Hag or Pochetinnos respective styles. PSG fans are among the most entitled in Europe. They lambasted Tuchel too in the end FFS. In all honesty they've had bigger issues with their big stars not delivering when it counts, particularly Neymar



Ok. So say Hag didn't make that semifinal do you honestly think we'd be looking at him based on what he's achieved domestically alone? Please answer that because Peter Bosz before him actually made it to the EL final with a team of kids. De Boer before Bosz won the Eridivisie 4 times on the trot. Both managers didn't last a season after their step up post Ajax. Pochetinno punched above his weight and broke into the top three on three occasions with one of those seasons being a genuine title challenging one (2016/17). Had he managed City or Liverpool with the support and structure they currently have he'd have won the title at least once. You simply can't grasp the magnitude of his achievements at Spurs and that says a lot about you. The fact you label Poch pragmatic snd stop at that that indicates you know nothing about his philosophy and array of trusted plays in his overall approach. Pep and Klopp have also on more than one occasion shown willingness to sacrifice their main ideals and leaned on pragmatism to get over the line in key games. Maybe you should watch and observe more
Actually, I do observe a lot. In fact I was pro Poch at some point but the level of poor performances his PsG sides have served throughout his tenure helped me realize that he is not the manager we need. Constantly getting bailed out by Mbappe is what his PsG side is all about.

I never witnessed Pep and Klopp parking the bus against a more progressive side(ex psg vs city this year). Yes they have practiced pragmatism on one or more occasions but that is an outlier for them. Not a norm.

And yes, ETH isn't being considered because of that run that happened 3 years ago. He is being considered because he has a certain playing style which does not depend on the personnel. His philosophy is based on modern progressive football and his teams are always on the front foot. Something which has completely been missing with Utd since LvG's 3 game run and something beyond your grasp. He has his team's CL performances(smashing dortmund for ex) to back that up because this description might fit other candidates as well but they don't have evidence.

Yes, De Boer and Bosz did great and failed. Doesn't mean it's applicable to all managers. FDJ was awesome in Eredivise and is a huge player for Barcelona. VdB was great in Eredivisie but not so good after. Who said anything is set in stone? It's about changing the direction which won't be the case with Poch. It will be same old personnel dependent philosophy which I wouldn't back at all.

Really funny how you paint Pochettino's achievements at Spurs(basically feck all). Coming 3rd in a 2 horse race must be good I guess. You disregard how horrendous Spurs were the during that CL run season and a season after that. You disregard how bad his record is against better sides. You disregard how he threw away cup games so that his teams could finish 4th.
 
Doesn't it concern people that Poch, by all accounts, is the manager these players would prefer to player under though ?
 
Look I'm not interested in this weird United culture war. Both are excellent candidates to me, I just don't feel the need to diminish a fine manager's name to prove my point. What's the agenda about? It's just weird.

It's hardly a "culture war" ffs. It's not the Messi vs Ronaldo thread in here. Pochettino is obviously a very good manager, it just feels like we more or less know what his upper level is and that makes him a massively uninspiring choice when set against someone who seems like they might have a high enough upside to have us properly competing again (or might be a massive flop).

As far as the people saying daft things like "I'd rather be relegated than have Poch", I hold @Amadaeus personally responsible for the level of disdain Poch sometimes gets on here. :lol:
 
Doesn't it concern people that Poch, by all accounts, is the manager these players would prefer to player under though ?

Why would it concern anyone what a bunch of spineless serial losers have to say on the matter? Most of whom won't even be at the club 2 years from now.
 
Really funny how you paint Pochettino's achievements at Spurs(basically feck all). Coming 3rd in a 2 horse race must be good I guess. You disregard how horrendous Spurs were the during that CL run season and a season after that. You disregard how bad his record is against better sides. You disregard how he threw away cup games so that his teams could finish 4th.

He finished 4th once in 4 seasons, which he got to the Champions League final in! He finished 2nd and 3rd twice. There weren't playing for 4th at any point.
 
Doesn't it concern people that Poch, by all accounts, is the manager these players would prefer to player under though ?
Yep. It does, more than Poch actually being our manager itself. The fact they have this picture in their heads about how he will be with them, probably given to them by Pillsbury Doughboy. What if he is not like that now? PSG might have soured him towards big headed players. It might be funny to see some of their noses being put out of joint. Sign Rice and make him captain, that would be funny as well. Rumoured he wants Kane. Can't see us getting both. Which is needed more?
 
Funny how every anti-ETH story, and there are more negative than positive as time goes on is discredited by people on here :lol:

As I've said, this drip-drip is turning of the screw by United and ends with the appointment of Poch.
 
He finished 4th once in 4 seasons, which he got to the Champions League final in! He finished 2nd and 3rd twice. There weren't playing for 4th at any point.
Okay, let's change that to Top 4 then. Changes nothing.
 
I’m going to whisper this very softly because it’s an unpopular opinion nowadays but getting the best out of players is actually a key part of the manager’s job…
It is important, but a number of the managers lately have got the best out of the players, but it doesn't last. Getting a season of performances is the key. Get rid of the sulkers and ones whose heads drop too easily. I would love to see us being all out attack and stick to it, not go ultra defensive at the first stumble.
 
Doesn't it concern people that Poch, by all accounts, is the manager these players would prefer to player under though ?

You mean a bunch of English ex-pros who usually don't know a single thing about anything that happens outside the PL?

The same people would have championed Brendan Rodgers's appointment as Liverpool manager and ummed and erred about Klopp as well.
 
I’m going to whisper this very softly because it’s an unpopular opinion nowadays but getting the best out of players is actually a key part of the manager’s job…

Yep, it's the players that actually ultimately play for a manager, people can shout all they like about clearouts, but with £208m player salary on the table and not many suitors, you can't just get rid of every single player, there is going to be a core that will stay and they're the ones that are performing on the pitch. I understand people are sick of United players underperforming and moaning but at the end of the day no matter what manager arrives, there are still going to be at least 13-14 players from this season's squad still in next season's squad.
 
You mean a bunch of English ex-pros who usually don't know a single thing about anything that happens outside the PL?

The same people would have championed Brendan Rodgers's appointment as Liverpool manager and ummed and erred about Klopp as well.
He might mean a number of the current players who are championing him. The ex-ones are at it as well. As they seem to be basing everything on what SAF did, none of them seem to have learnt a jot from him about how to manage or coach.
 
Yep, it's the players that actually ultimately play for a manager, people can shout all they like about clearouts, but with £208m player salary on the table and not many suitors, you can't just get rid of every single player, there is going to be a core that will stay and they're the ones that are performing on the pitch. I understand people are sick of United players underperforming and moaning but at the end of the day no matter what manager arrives, there are still going to be at least 13-14 players from this season's squad still in next season's squad.
Think the best thing to do would be ignore everything the players have to say as it is vacuous crap most of the time and hypocritical at other times.
 
It is important, but a number of the managers lately have got the best out of the players, but it doesn't last. Getting a season of performances is the key. Get rid of the sulkers and ones whose heads drop too easily. I would love to see us being all out attack and stick to it, not go ultra defensive at the first stumble.
Pochetino is known to be demanding. I’ve no idea where this myth that he isn’t has come from.
 
Pochetino is known to be demanding. I’ve no idea where this myth that he isn’t has come from.
Still think he needs to be ruthless with the sulkers, hopefully some will be off in the summer anyway. If they have sulked and moaned with previous managers they will do it again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.