kthanksbye
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2014
- Messages
- 1,506
Would take Enrique over ETH and Mancini over Poch.
Tuchel is worth considering too.
Tuchel is worth considering too.
I wouldn’t wait for Enrique though if it meant waiting until after the World Cup.Would take Enrique over ETH and Mancini over Poch.
Tuchel is worth considering too.
Agreed. We can't afford to wait.I wouldn’t wait for Enrique though if it meant waiting until after the World Cup.
I thought everyone was on board ETH train. He is seen as an up and coming manager capable of challenging Pep and Klopp in the long term.
All of sudden, everyone now going for Tuchel and abandon the long term project?
Genuinely wonder why people think todays news will mean the end of Chelsea and Tuchel. I don’t think it changes anything, in fact, Chelsea could come out of this stronger - no debt to RA, new owners with deep pockets, a new dawn for the club and why would the new owners not want one of the current best managers in world football to remain?
No way is he leaving, no way at all.
Chelsea won’t exist within a few weeks remember.I thought Chelsea aren't able to hire/sell players and staff? So if that's the case, they can't hire another manager, so the chances of Tuchel coming to United are nil.
At least he is an upgrade on Moyes who has won feck all.
...oh wait.
The last I heard was that Abramovic can't even sell the club anymore
Got to be ten Haag over him surely? Has hasenhuttl ever managed anyone in the champions league? Ten Haag for me is gonna be one of the best managers in a few years, just needs to prove it by coming to the prem, he makes players better, that for me is proper coaching. Hasenhuttl will struggle with us I think.Still on Ten Hag vs Hasenhüttl. I dont care what had happened between Ragnick and Hasenhüttl in the past. Its theirs business, not mine. I just give my opinion on what i have observed.
Again. If Ten Hag beat one of the best club right now in Bayern, City, Liverpool and Chelsea. Ten Hag is up there with the best.
And if Hasenhüttl beat City and Pep out of FA Cup. Hassenhuttl are up there with Pep and Klopp. Hasenhüttl has beat Liverpool and Klopp once too.
So for me personally. There are only between those too. Let see if they can beat the big guns. Biggest test for both.
I thought everyone was on board ETH train. He is seen as an up and coming manager capable of challenging Pep and Klopp in the long term.
All of sudden, everyone now going for Tuchel and abandon the long term project?
Still on Ten Hag vs Hasenhüttl. I dont care what had happened between Ragnick and Hasenhüttl in the past. Its theirs business, not mine. I just give my opinion on what i have observed.
Again. If Ten Hag beat one of the best club right now in Bayern, City, Liverpool and Chelsea. Ten Hag is up there with the best.
And if Hasenhüttl beat City and Pep out of FA Cup. Hassenhuttl are up there with Pep and Klopp. Hasenhüttl has beat Liverpool and Klopp once too.
So for me personally. There are only between those too. Let see if they can beat the big guns. Biggest test for both.
A bit harsh on Hassenhutti.What is the Obsession with Hassenhuttl?
He has overseen 2 9-0 defeats in his time at Southampton, his teams play ok football but don't set the world alight.
You want to give him the job at United when he can't set up a team at Southampton?
let me guess you saw him wearing a tracksuit & baseball cap & thought he looks like Klopp so maybe he is a great manager.
Interesting logic. Ole beat City, Liverpool and Chelsea. Do you consider him up there with the best?Still on Ten Hag vs Hasenhüttl. I dont care what had happened between Ragnick and Hasenhüttl in the past. Its theirs business, not mine. I just give my opinion on what i have observed.
Again. If Ten Hag beat one of the best club right now in Bayern, City, Liverpool and Chelsea. Ten Hag is up there with the best.
And if Hasenhüttl beat City and Pep out of FA Cup. Hassenhuttl are up there with Pep and Klopp. Hasenhüttl has beat Liverpool and Klopp once too.
So for me personally. There are only between those too. Let see if they can beat the big guns. Biggest test for both.
Good post .Abandon what long term project? You're talking as though we run the club and select the manager. For all we know ETH may have never been offered the job anyway. There's no reason to believe Tuchel isn't a long term option either and he's 4 years younger than ETH, for what it's worth.
There's also no evidence that ETH can hang with Klopp or Pep, whereas Tuchel is more proven. Managers of ETH ilk have been and gone over the last few years and not many turn out top level.
Interesting logic. Ole beat City, Liverpool and Chelsea. Do you consider him up there with the best?
Not a fan then?
I'm sticking with my own opinion that Poch would be a great manager for United. I haven't heard any of his players at Southampton or Tottenham say anything negative about him; quite the opposite. He got Spurs to a CL final playing excellent football and even though he has never won a pot, he knows the PL. PSG is a different kettle of fish and I won't hold the defeat at Real against him.
Tuchel's stylistically closer to ten Hag than Rangnick. Tuchel in his own words has been heavily influenced by Cruyff, Wenger and Guardiola, and hence adopts the position play principles. And watching his teams play, it's clear that he wants to control zones on the pitch, with and without the ball.Thanks for the full answer. Appreciate it.
Also, definitely think Tuchel makes more sense than Ten Hag. Stylistically, Ten Hag is much closer to the Cruyff, Ajax, Barcelona style of play. Tuchel's principles are much more closely aligned with Rangnick's. If we're looking for a coach who can come in and build on what Ralf has done, rather than start from zero again, Tuchel's the best option (besides Nagelsmann, which is a pipe dream).
Ask me again in a couple of weeks. As with many football fans, my attitude towards my club's manager is volatile and dependent on current eventsHaha. One can dream though.
I can see why Simone would not be considered by Utd, but there is this myth about how boring his football is.Simeone is a total non-starter for anyone who hated the football under Jose.
He's also one of the highest paid managers in the world who just signed an extension last summer so he'd cost an arm and a leg to poach him on top of the language barrier.
Still a terrific manager and he's almost single handedly turned Atletico into an institution in Spain even in the face of the traditional duopoly there but would be just a terrible fit all around for United.
He's like Atletico's Fergie and Wenger so I don't expect him anywhere else tbh. If he ever left I'd only see it for another club dear to his heart like Inter/Lazio or back home in Argentina, not England
To be fair, most teams we play find it quite easy to press well against usI can see why Simone would not be considered by Utd, but there is this myth about how boring his football is.
I have never seen a team press Utd like Athletico did in that first half. Not even City or Liverpool…..and that was with half his team missing. I think with the right backing, this guy could surprise a few people!
Tuchel's stylistically closer to ten Hag than Rangnick. Tuchel in his own words has been heavily influenced by Cruyff, Wenger and Guardiola, and hence adopts the position play principles. And watching his teams play, it's clear that he wants to control zones on the pitch, with and without the ball.
I can see why Simone would not be considered by Utd, but there is this myth about how boring his football is.
I have never seen a team press Utd like Athletico did in that first half. Not even City or Liverpool…..and that was with half his team missing. I think with the right backing, this guy could surprise a few people!
Erik ten Hag is also the same and sets his teams out to play a very vertical game. Did you watch Tuchel at Dortmund and Mainz? Erik ten Hag is a cross between a Guardiola and a Klopp in style and I've mentioned this before in my previous posts. And I agree Tuchel is a hybrid in style between the heavy counter pressing approach of Rangnick, Klopp, Hassenhuttl and the zone control via possession approach of Guardiola, Cruyff and Wenger. Hence why Tuchel has gone on record and said he's been heavily influenced by the aforementioned coaches who exerted zonal and positional control straight from the Rinus Michels play book.Not sure I agree. Tuchel stresses verticality more than Ten Hag. Even if he likes passing it about more than other German coaches.
I'd say Tuchel is currently a halfway house between the German and Dutch schools. To use Klopp terms he's the conductor of a Heavy metal orchestra.
You cannot play the German way without a grounding in shape and position play. Indeed, we've had reports of our players moaning about the amount of shapework Rangnick has them do in training. Unfortunately for them it's impossible to launch coordinated pressing moves without drilling shape relentlessly.
Tuchel's Chelsea don't press high, they lure opponents into areas of the pitch then transition. This is what Rangnick has taken to doing after seeing our squad of Big time Charlie's fail to implement a high pressing 4222.
When Chelsea attack the stress is on verticality. Chelsea are not trying to hold possession as a means of self defence or trying to pick the lock Dutch style. Chelsea thrive when they can exploit transitions.
For these reasons I see Tuchel as closer to Rangnick than Ten Hag. Ten Hag is closer to Pep than Tuchel.