Sparky_Hughes
I am Shitbeard.
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2008
- Messages
- 17,562
Remember the Doc ?
Um yes..............dont want him either........your point is?
Remember the Doc ?
I would opt for Pep, if we could get him.
Mourinho tells Sneijder to stay at Inter = Mourinho must be the next United manager
The sad thing is, had he told Sneijder to sign for United people would be saying the exact same thing.
So basically: Anything Mourinho says in connection with Man Utd = Mourinho will be next United manager.
Right.
Who drew that conclusion?
"People recognize his enthusiasm, the fans understand that he's fighting for them and for the squad."
Klopp brings youngsters from OUR academy?
Yeah, he fought for Inter so much that he left them for a bigger job. José really cares.
Advantages - Young, knows how to win things, everyone who works with him loves him.
Disadvantages - Might randomly sack the entire coaching staff, may not stay there very long, may not bring through youth players, may not leave behind a legacy, would make United the more hated.
Advantages - Young, knows how to win things, everyone who works with him loves him.
Disadvantages - Might randomly sack the entire coaching staff, may not stay there very long, may not bring through youth players, may not leave behind a legacy, would make United the more hated.
I myself am not won over by the notion but given the way they are playing at the minute (see thread re madrids beautiful counter attacking) and the probability that fergie of all people would endorse his move is there anyone here that was previously against the idea of mourinho taking over now warming to it? or do you feel its his attitude rather than style of play that makes him an unattractive prospect?
His ideas are interesting and his football isn't as boring as it once was made out to be.
Call it gut feeling, but I think OGS will be our next manager. There are certain links with SAF's history, naturally it'll depend on how well OGS does in the next few years, but I just have this feeling thats what will happen.
He's a fan favourite after all and will be given time not to mention he'll carry on with bringing through youngsters, he knows the clubs setup and has been under SAF's wing as both a player and as on the management team.
Did anyone see the Scholes's interview in Four-Four-Two?
Paul reckons Giggs is the man to take over, in the same way as Pep did at Barca.
I'm not saying I agree or disagree, but Scholesy is a well placed as anyone to have a valid opinion.
I like this
I don't.
Neither do i. Too much of a risk and we cant afford that when we've so many young players with great potential in the squad and more coming through. anyone with no managerial experience will be a big risk, giggsy or not.
I don't think any utd fan would be unhappy with that.
I wouldn't want any club legend taking the job, it's not a good situation because the guy is almost unsackable.
quite hoesntly Id rather have Giggsy, Moyes, Hitler Bin Laden or Pol Pot than that arrogant cock munching crap talking asshole Mourinho.
If it means they are given patience then history proves that is generally a good thing.
Does it really though? There are one or two examples of it, but I'd say the majority of managers are more successful at the start of their career at any given club than in the subsequent years. Take Wenger at Arsenal, he's been there nearly 15 years now, having success early on, and now they get worse and worse every season, Benitez at Liverpool, won the European Cup and FA Cup in his first two seasons, won feck all from then until his sacking.
Successful managers tend to spend longer at their clubs, yeah, but the success is the causal factor, it makes them more difficult to get rid of, it's not the result.