Sweet Square
ˈkämyənəst
If you are a comedian it's part of the job.
If you are a comedian it's part of the job.
Why is it such a big deal if you were to do that? They are just regular people like anybody else. Chappelle has been told and criticized that he's not allowed to make fun of them etc. and as a comedian, he's going to explore that boundary.Like I said, I don’t necessarily agree with this premise. You can be a comedian without taking the piss out of someone who identifies as trans. It’s not that difficult.
Well for starters trans people don’t have the same legal rights as you and me. They don’t have access to healthcare like you and me. They are constantly treated terribly by cops. As we speak, multiple states are looking for ways to ban them from accessing basic healthcare. The list is endless.Why is it such a big deal if you were to do that? They are just regular people like anybody else. Chappelle has been told and criticized that he's not allowed to make fun of them etc. and as a comedian, he's going to explore that boundary.
Which is all bad. Obviously.Well for starters trans people don’t have the same legal rights as you and me. They don’t have access to healthcare like you and me. They are constantly treated terribly by cops. As we speak, multiple states are looking for ways to ban them from accessing basic healthcare. The list is endless.
Get the feeling Chappelle talking about trans issues is a way of padding out what is another poor special.
Sure. As a parallell, there's this mantra a lot of online right wingers and centrists have at the moment that "racism has lost all meaning" because apparantly everything is racist nowadays. You'll find variants of takes here, some saying that being called a racist is a badge of honor (because the wokies and lefties are so stupid), etc. etc. These people often don't actually see themselves as racists, but what they're doing still says something about them.
Even if Chappelle doesn't believe that he is transphobic, calling himself a transphobe ironically isn't some neutral act. It illustrates what he thinks of the criticism he has gotten for his helicopter jokes and all the other stuff. He doesn't take it seriously, and he's laughing about it. Some people might think that's a bad thing, especially if some people have a dead friend that Chappelle is using as a shield.
Yep. His basically too rich and famous to come up with anything decent anymore. The Chappelle show is his best work and it's still a pretty amazing sketch show but at least for me anyway he was never one of the best stand ups of all time or even of his generation.He's just not that funny any more.
Yep. His basically too rich and famous to come up with anything decent anymore. The Chappelle show is his best work and it's still a pretty amazing sketch show but at least for me anyway he was never one of the best stand ups of all time or even of his generation.
This big debate people are having over it is a bit odd because the two sides arguing against each pretty much agree that it was a poor unfunny special. And if the clown isn't funny who gives a shit what he has to say.
My main beef with him is that comedians like Dave Chappelle — who made their name by discussing difficult and controversial topics in the form of a stand up, simply have to do their due diligence on that topic. He clearly didn't, so he comes across as lazy and ignorant even if not really malicious — and, to add insult to injury, his special simply isn't that funny either (just like any stand up that still does generic bits on cancel culture nowadays).
Acaster though
Tbh you kind of have to watch him to find out if he isn't funny or hasn't anything interesting to say.I mean if you don’t find Dave Chappelle funny or aren’t interested in what he has to say then just don’t watch him
I believe their is already enough material out there to decide that by now.Tbh you kind of have to watch him to find out if he isn't funny or hasn't anything interesting to say.
Well, he was very funny at some point. Less so, but still funny after that. I wasn’t watching it knowing that I wouldn’t like it obviously.I mean if you don’t find Dave Chappelle funny or aren’t interested in what he has to say then just don’t watch him
HmmmWell, he was very funny at some point. Less so, but still funny after that. I wasn’t watching it knowing that I wouldn’t like it obviously.
It's really sad that this seems to be the hill he wants to die on.Yeah, getting worked up about him saying she bombed is a bit silly. It was her 6th, 7th time onstage? I’m in the stand-up scene, and becoming good enough to do well for 45 mins takes YEARS. Hardly a surprise.
Getting worked up about him calling himself a TERF and transphobic…obviously a comedic device, really weird thing to latch on to.
I’m someone who thinks he would have done well to limit it to one special, and I have qualms with how much he pushes Daphne ahead of him for credibility, but that write-up is missing the point to a large extent. At any rate what is clear is that Dave is toying with the emotions of one of the most vulnerable minorities out there today. Is he that hard-up for material?
Yeah, this is where I stand. It's just so unnecessary and unbecoming of him.I'm not personally offended by anything Chappelle said in his specials, it wasn't directed at me. However I was uncomfortable that such big chunks of his recent shows were aimed squarely at belittling a minority that already faces verbal and physical abuse on a daily basis. Same with the likes of Glinner and J.K. Rowling using their platform to undermine. Its not shining a light on a social issue, its bullying.
Having never seen anything from Dave Chapelle before, I thought I'd give this a go so I can get more background for all this controversy.
Firstly, I'm 20 minutes in and it's terrible.
Secondly, which is nearly just as annoying as Chapelle slagging gay people (I haven't even gotten to the transgender parts yet), how 'easy' is this audience? They're cracking up at every half sentence he speaks, with someone in the crowd wailing with laughter each time. I guess that comes with being one of the most famous comedians in the world, but my god is it annoying.
Yeah I realise it sounds thick - I guess it's mostly cause I'm not finding it funny, so these people cracking up with his every utterance grates a bit.You find it annoying that people are laughing at a comedy show?
Yeah I realise it sounds thick - I guess it's mostly cause I'm not finding it funny, so these people cracking up with his every utterance grates a bit.
What seats do you have?It's really sad that this seems to be the hill he wants to die on.
I literally grew up on Chappelle and he was my first, and perhaps only comedic idol. Like, I knew of him from his Def Comedy Jam days and the appearances in Blue Streak and Nutty Professor in the late-90s. I saw Killin Em Softly and For What It's Worth multiple times, I would torrent Chappelle's Show the day after it was aired in the US back in the early-noughties, heck I even bought Seasons 1 and 2 of it on DVD from Amazon despite me knowing I didn't have a region-free DVD player. And when I was old enough and he started touring internationally again, I've been to 2 of his shows and will be going to the 3rd one next week.
But his Netflix specials haven't been of the same level. The closest and only genuinely good-great one was 8:46 and that wasn't even on Netflix.
The worst thing is, I know the old Dave is there, deep inside. The one who was funny, insightful, and melancholic in one package. Who wasn't afraid to put his head above the parapet even if it cost him materially. The old Dave wouldn't have bothered with at least half of the material he's put in these Netflix specials. And yet, this Dave has.
Dave really needs to listen to himself.
I agree with you that no one should take anything Chappelle says seriouslyOr people need to understand he's aware no-one should be taking what he says seriously? As a comedian in his act since its literally meant as a joke, or outside of his act because his opinion is worth no more than any other.
but sadly Dave disagrees.And if the clown isn't funny who gives a shit what he has to say.
https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2021/oct/09/dave-chappelle-letter-trans-comedian-netflix
Came across the youtube video in a comments section and felt it was there was some pretty decent criticism of the show as well as talking about some of the context around the reef stuff. Personally felt she was a bit too easy on him for his lack of understanding around the issue and how he went about it, Chapelle pointing out that he's been getting criticism for around 16 years for some of his jokes but is still using jokes he doesn't need to.
Some interesting points about discussions that need to be had and around lbtq+ issues and non-white voices not necessarily being heard as much.
Guardian article was linked in the comments section which went in on him just a little bit harder.
Black people, native Americans, Muslims, Chinese, Jews and countless other groups have the piss taken out of them in stand ups, DC didn't start it. Whether you think that should be off limits is a different argument.
I can’t remember who but I still hear race and religious jokes. Not a big thing, if it’s funny audience laughs and move on.how many modern comedians make racist, homophobic or antisemetic jokes these days? Do we not cringe when we see this kind of humour from comedians from the 70s and 80s?
I can’t remember who but I still hear race and religious jokes. Not a big thing, if it’s funny audience laughs and move on.
This dictation about what we can and can’t find funny or joke about is what needs to get cancelled. Humour is what separates us from other animals and the ability to appreciate dark or offensive humour and detach it from reality is a great gift that I won’t be allowing an ignorant minority to deprive me of.
If it’s part of a diverse standup act then yes. I think most people have the intelligence to realise when a person is making stereotype jokes due 1) to his/her experience 2) area they grew up in and friends 3) Current news vs when someone is simply being a jerk and expressing what they think.so you’re saying racist jokes are ok?
What is it’s not diverse and just 3 specials beating us over the head about the same thing?If it’s part of a diverse standup act then yes. I think most people have the intelligence to realise when a person is making stereotype jokes due 1) to his/her experience 2) area they grew up in and friends 3) Current news vs when someone is simply being a jerk and expressing what they think.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/10/dave-chappelle-the-closer/620364/
Nice article from the Atlantic attempting to be the voice of reason.
damn you caught me at the wrong time. I just blazed a fat doobie and am unable to sufficiently reply to your post. I will respond once sober. This is the first time I'm hearing about this writer and will do some research.I suspect the a lot of people in the transcommunity will be unsurprised at Helen Lewis' defence of Chappelle on his trans comments and sceptical as to the idea of her being "the voice of reason" given she has previously:
- Been repeatedly accused of transphobia.
- Written columns about attending meetings of Woman' Place UK (an organisation who have variously been described as a "hate group", "a clearly transphobic organisation", "the most well-known grassroots anti-trans feminist group".)
- Claimed that acceptance of transgender people’s right to self-identify means that women are unable to “challenge someone with a beard exposing their penis in a women’s changing room”.
- Strongly criticised proposed reforms to the Gender Recognition Act as “gender’s version of Brexit” and a “radical rewriting of our understanding of identity”, asserting that “a man can’t just say he has turned into a woman”.
- Described the transgender rights movement as "the imperial overreach of a handful of trans activists, in trying to rewrite widely accepted ideas about gender by stealth,”.
- Said trans activism “has done nothing to improve the lives of trans people.”
- Claimed the word "TERF" was a glorification of misogyny.
- In an interview with Jordan Peterson stated: “I don’t believe you can be a man born in a woman’s body or a woman born in a man’s body. What I believe is that there are some people who feel alienation towards their bodies”.
- Was removed as a voice actor from the Ubisoft game Watch Dogs: Legion for her remarks about gender identity.
I'm gonna say she has a dog in this fight already.
damn you caught me at the wrong time. I just blazed a fat doobie and am unable to sufficiently reply to your post. I will respond once sober. This is the first time I'm hearing about this writer and will do some research.
If it’s part of a diverse standup act then yes. I think most people have the intelligence to realise when a person is making stereotype jokes due 1) to his/her experience 2) area they grew up in and friends 3) Current news vs when someone is simply being a jerk and expressing what they think.
think the difference is you can buy your favourite artists music simply to support them but its hard to force yourself to laugh. You either do find something funny or you don't. People will go to their fav music acts simply for nostaligia but comedians is different as they have to get laughs or people won't pay anymore. You can see how some greats of the past aren't really doing much anymore which is just a sign of the times. I agree that most people who like Dave's work probably are older as they come from a less hypersensitive generation where you could be a bit dark with it . So of course you are correct in that comedians typically have their "eras." Eventually he too may die out. That said his story telling and delivery will always be there.Having been one of the funniest comedians of his generation doesn't mean his current act is particularly great, nor does being commercially successful.
The Rolling Stones were a great band and their later albums still regularly top charts and reach gold/platinum status. Few people would use that to argue their new material is particularly good though. They're a legacy act.
Let's be real, if it it wasn't for the work earlier in his career then nobody would be using Chappelle's latest specials to argue for him being one of the best comedians of his generation. Aside from making headlines for anti-Trans material, the notable aspect of his recent work was how deliberately not funny a large portion of 8:46 was. Other than that rather unique special in a unique context, it's been fairly meh.
It shouldn't be particularly surprising that some people don't find him all that any more, particularly if they're not part of the now older generation who were exposed to Chappelle some 20-odd years ago. The same with Gervais, a completely mainstream, establishment-friendly comedian (despite his "have I offended you?" schtick) whose best work was also 20 years ago. At some point these middle-aged and aging comedians sound middle aged and old, just like comedians who peaked around 1980 would have sounded when Chappelle was releasing Killing Them Softly in 2000. Time is a bitch.