Nemanja Matic| BBC says deal agreed

Status
Not open for further replies.
IF we sign him, will we bring back the Nemanja chant? Or is that exclusively for Vidic.

Works perfectly enough with this Nemanja. :drool:
 
I don't understand why are people so much against him. We're in dire need of a holding/defensive midfielder. We all know Carrick can't play every week and we all know we have no one else who could do that job. Yes, there are probably better targets, but are those better targets attainable?
Matic had 35 appearances for the team that ran away with the title as early as the winter. And that was in a 2 man midfield. Yes the other midfielder was Kante, who's work rate is exceptional. But we do have Herrera as well.
Matic is tailor made to sit in front of the back four. He's popular with his dribble or his agility, but neither is Carrick. He's good at protecting the ball and passing (7 assists in the league last season). His defending is not class A, but he is one of the best in class B.
For the position he is, he could easily play 4-5 seasons, even if he is 29. On top of all he's tall which only boosts our defensive rating.

If he comes in the 30-40m region, it will be a good deal. If he comes for <32m I would call it a very good deal. 25m and it's a bargain.

4231 - Pogba and Herrera
433 - Pogba, Herrera and Matic

I think this would be a good signing.
 
I hope Chelsea aren't still feeling buthurt over Lukaku. Matic would be an excellent signing tbh. I'd take him over Dier any day of the week.
 
Don't think Chelsea would be bothered about selling him to us. If we are interested we'll sign him imo.
 
I've still got my fingers crossed for Matić. Hopefully Conte is over the Lukaku hijacking.
 
If Matic is hell-bent on coming to us, he will (assuming we are willing to pay the fees Chelsea want). Players have all the power in the world of football.
 
I thought Conte wouldn't sell out of spite, but after hearing reports from Guardian that Matic is "desperate" to leave for us, it may well force his hand.

Would welcome him here in any case. I much prefer Fabinho but I completely trust Mourinho in defensive minded recruitments (attacking not so much).
 
I think Chelsea would be crazy to sell us a player mourinho really desperately wants after seeing a player who apparently mourinho and conte desperately wanted join mourinho.

It would be like if city bought lacazette and arsenal then sold Sanchez.
 
I've still got my fingers crossed for Matić. Hopefully Conte is over the Lukaku hijacking.

I'm not convinced we even hijacked Lukaku, he himself has said he knew where he was going for months. Anyway Matic would be a great signing, Prem proven, a winner and the manager knows him inside out, no bedding in required, much better option than the Caf hipsters choice, a right back playing out of position, give me a specialist any day.
 
I think Chelsea would be crazy to sell us a player mourinho really desperately wants after seeing a player who apparently mourinho and conte desperately wanted join mourinho.

It would be like if city bought lacazette and arsenal then sold Sanchez.
I'd be livid. Not because of the whole Lukaku business but because we'd be selling a good player to a direct rival while leaving ourselves weakened in midfield. If Bakayoko won't be fit for a while, having only Fabregas and Kante is a huge risk.

We should be keeping Matic until at least January.
 
I'd be livid. Not because of the whole Lukaku business but because we'd be selling a good player to a direct rival while leaving ourselves weakened in midfield. If Bakayoko won't be fit for a while, having only Fabregas and Kante is a huge risk.

We should be keeping Matic until at least January.

Bakayoko is only going to miss a month. Use the Matic money and buy a squad player.
 
I don't understand why are people so much against him. We're in dire need of a holding/defensive midfielder. We all know Carrick can't play every week and we all know we have no one else who could do that job. Yes, there are probably better targets, but are those better targets attainable?
Matic had 35 appearances for the team that ran away with the title as early as the winter. And that was in a 2 man midfield. Yes the other midfielder was Kante, who's work rate is exceptional. But we do have Herrera as well.
Matic is tailor made to sit in front of the back four. He's popular with his dribble or his agility, but neither is Carrick. He's good at protecting the ball and passing (7 assists in the league last season). His defending is not class A, but he is one of the best in class B.
For the position he is, he could easily play 4-5 seasons, even if he is 29. On top of all he's tall which only boosts our defensive rating.

If he comes in the 30-40m region, it will be a good deal. If he comes for <32m I would call it a very good deal. 25m and it's a bargain.

4231 - Pogba and Herrera
433 - Pogba, Herrera and Matic

I think this would be a good signing.
That is not the way to look at it.
  • If he comes at 40 million +100k/week (5.2 million per year for 5 years ) he will cost us 13.2 million per year
  • If he comes at 35 million +150K/WEEK (7.8 million per year for 5 years) He will cost us 14.8 million per year
  • If he comes at 30 million +200k/week (10.4 million per year for 5 years) he will cost us 16.4 million per year.
This is how football accounts are maintained. Please do not just refer to the fees to justify a deal. I think everyone needs to see this.
 
That is not the way to look at it.
  • If he comes at 40 million +100k/week (5.2 million per year for 5 years ) he will cost us 13.2 million per year
  • If he comes at 35 million +150K/WEEK (7.8 million per year for 5 years) He will cost us 14.8 million per year
  • If he comes at 30 million +200k/week (10.4 million per year for 5 years) he will cost us 16.4 million per year.
This is how football accounts are maintained. Please do not just refer to the fees to justify a deal. I think everyone needs to see this.

Thank you! I feel complete now.
 
Bakayoko is only going to miss a month. Use the Matic money and buy a squad player.
Thats the only way selling Matic would make sense.
 
That is not the way to look at it.
  • If he comes at 40 million +100k/week (5.2 million per year for 5 years ) he will cost us 13.2 million per year
  • If he comes at 35 million +150K/WEEK (7.8 million per year for 5 years) He will cost us 14.8 million per year
  • If he comes at 30 million +200k/week (10.4 million per year for 5 years) he will cost us 16.4 million per year.
This is how football accounts are maintained. Please do not just refer to the fees to justify a deal. I think everyone needs to see this.
How does the amortization of transfer fees affect how we talk about them as fans? We're not maintaining the club's accounts. He's discussing what would be a good deal; the overall transfer fee is a perfectly fine way to discuss that.
 
I see the accountants are out in force again. The people who run our club know exactly what they're doing. They certainly know a great deal more than any of us.

What happened to caring about what happens on the pitch, first and foremost?
 
Chelsea will probably sell him to Inter Milan. Sky said a few days ago that Inter are ready to bid 35 million for him, so if that's the case then I can't see them selling him to us.
 
How does the amortization of transfer fees affect how we talk about them as fans? We're not maintaining the club's accounts. He's discussing what would be a good deal; the overall transfer fee is a perfectly fine way to discuss that.
How is that? if we are paying 30 million in fees and 200 k in wages(82 million total) it cant be a better deal than paying 40 million and 100k in wages(total 65 million). It is simple mathematics.
I dont need to tell you that paying 82 million is costlier than 65 million or can you spin it another way?
 
Chelsea will probably sell him to Inter Milan. Sky said a few days ago that Inter are ready to bid 35 million for him, so if that's the case then I can't see them selling him to us.
Inter have feck all money. The major chinese money in italian league is with Milan. They bought Borja fecking Valero . They will sell peresic and only then be able to buy one quality player.
 
How is that? if we are paying 30 million in fees and 200 k in wages(82 million total) it cant be a better deal than paying 40 million and 100k in wages(total 65 million). It is simple mathematics.
I dont need to tell you that paying 82 million is costlier than 65 million or can you spin it another way?
You have no idea what any player will be paid rendering the entire exercise redundant.
 
Think he'll stay now, since Bakayoko won't start the season and Conte will prefer an experienced option.
 
I'd be livid. Not because of the whole Lukaku business but because we'd be selling a good player to a direct rival while leaving ourselves weakened in midfield. If Bakayoko won't be fit for a while, having only Fabregas and Kante is a huge risk.

We should be keeping Matic until at least January.
You did the same thing with Mata and I don't think Chelsea have any reasons to regret that deal. As of now I don't really expect us to be in direct competition with Chelsea anyway.
 
You have no idea what any player will be paid rendering the entire exercise redundant.
Umm arent wages reported? Like does the new contract of messi hide how much will he be paid in wages? or do we not know Lingard signed a 100k contract or Young is on 120 k and herrera has been offered 175 k as per a newspaper? What are you on about?
 
Umm arent wages reported? Like does the new contract of messi hide how much will he be paid in wages? or do we not know Lingard signed a 100k contract or Young is on 120 k and herrera has been offered 175 k as per a newspaper? What are you on about?
No, wages are speculated upon. Unless you've seen a pay slip you have no idea who is being paid what.

EDIT My three daily posts have expired, @Maradona10. I see you don't believe fees are disclosed either. Making what you're doing even more redundant.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Akshay
Why would Chelsea sell us Matic and replace him with bakayoko? Makes no sense to me. I think Matic will stay and they will swap between kante, Matic and Bakayoko. Even if they sell Matic why to us and strengthen their rivals. Be surprised if this happens.
 
Think he'll stay now, since Bakayoko won't start the season and Conte will prefer an experienced option.
Not been training with the squad and Matt law the chelsea mouthpeice reckons "the players believe he will leave". He has refused to sign the contract for 18 months. He will leave.
 
Not been training with the squad and Matt law the chelsea mouthpeice reckons "the players believe he will leave". He has refused to sign the contract for 18 months. He will leave.

Things always change in football. He may change his opinion as time passes through summer.

And anyway, I don't think he'll be in United even if they see him.
 
Not been training with the squad and Matt law the chelsea mouthpeice reckons "the players believe he will leave". He has refused to sign the contract for 18 months. He will leave.

Which is at least some thing to cheer for, he won't be Chelsea reject, instead he wanted out.
 
I'd be livid. Not because of the whole Lukaku business but because we'd be selling a good player to a direct rival while leaving ourselves weakened in midfield. If Bakayoko won't be fit for a while, having only Fabregas and Kante is a huge risk.

We should be keeping Matic until at least January.
Chalobah is also an option, just needs to be given a chance.
 
Umm arent wages reported? Like does the new contract of messi hide how much will he be paid in wages? or do we not know Lingard signed a 100k contract or Young is on 120 k and herrera has been offered 175 k as per a newspaper? What are you on about?

As per a newspaper? Well then it must be true.
 
Why would Chelsea sell us Matic and replace him with bakayoko? Makes no sense to me. I think Matic will stay and they will swap between kante, Matic and Bakayoko. Even if they sell Matic why to us and strengthen their rivals. Be surprised if this happens.
Replacing Matic with Bakayoko in the first XI makes sense since he's much younger, better with the ball, and more mobile. Getting rid of Matic completely is the stupid thing. All these games we'll have next season, we need all the quality we can have.

Loftus-Cheek left yesterday on loan and there are rumblings of Chalobah leaving soon. That would leave us dangerously thin in midfield.
 
Which is at least some thing to cheer for, he won't be Chelsea reject, instead he wanted out.
I dont get the point of not signing Rejects? What if a player just dint work in a formation or tactics or maybe just couldnt live happily in a country?
"Rejects" have been some of the best buys over the years. KDB, Robben,Sniejder,Fabinho,Lindelof,Lukaku,Carvjal, Matic all were rejects . They all went on to do pretty well and those are just names on top of my head.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.