- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
- Messages
- 198
Matic is shit
How much success have we had since he came to us? We've made alot of mistakes in he market since then, hardly great competition of players for him eh? He was hailed as a superstar on the caf with a superstar reception (ddg and herrera standing next to a heartshaped helipad waiting for his landing in james bond suit and sunglasses), reality is he's not a player that can get us to the absolute top again as we have seen.How many player have been better than him since he came ?
Might sound stupid but really dont want to count one of the most fluked CL wins ever (as the Portugal EC win), it's more the exception than the rule and hopefully we wont be playing that sort of football anytime soon.Was a starter for Chelsea when they won CL 2012.
Was a starter for Chelsea when they won CL 2012.
How much success have we had since he came to us? We've made alot of mistakes in he market since then, hardly great competition of players for him eh? He was hailed as a superstar on the caf with a superstar reception (ddg and herrera standing next to a heartshaped helipad waiting for his landing in james bond suit and sunglasses), reality is he's not a player that can get us to the absolute top again as we have seen.
Did Herrera fly in from Bilbao just to be there?How much success have we had since he came to us? We've made alot of mistakes in he market since then, hardly great competition of players for him eh? He was hailed as a superstar on the caf with a superstar reception (ddg and herrera standing next to a heartshaped helipad waiting for his landing in james bond suit and sunglasses), reality is he's not a player that can get us to the absolute top again as we have seen.
Might sound stupid but really dont want to count one of the most fluked CL wins ever (as the Portugal EC win), it's more the exception than the rule and hopefully we wont be playing that sort of football anytime soon.
He was anonymous in that game. Just saying. We shouldn't make this a Mata debate but I have to agree he's not a title winning/champions league finalist number 10. Everyone that follows us deep down knows it. But top 4 team perfect.
This is such a valid, overlooked point.Don't understand why people are losing their shit over an ESPN article. It's a crap source.
Still a CL win and that's what counts for them, and still he was a starter in this team.
So we're moving from him being a starter to him being anonymous in the game or not ? He was a starter in a CL winning team and that deprives this point.
That loose fact bothered you more than the heartshaped helipad?Did Herrera fly in from Bilbao just to be there?
So was Bertrand. The point is he's not good enough.
Against Chelsea you mean.Was a starter for Chelsea when they won CL 2012.
Those are the facts yeah, let me word it in another way, if we want to become elite like Real, Barcelona, Bayern, Mata wont be good enough in the long term even though he's one of our better players momentarily. Got too little to his game, no pace, no strength, no dribble and beating a player and he's more tidy and neat than really creative. Very good finisher though but wont ever be prolific enough to be a second striker either. Nice player to have a team but also not a game changer.Still a CL win and that's what counts for them, and still he was a starter in this team.
So we're moving from him being a starter to him being anonymous in the game or not ? He was a starter in a CL winning team and that deprives this point.
Against Chelsea you mean.
For Benfica in the quarter finals.
Against Chelsea you mean.
For Benfica in the quarter finals.
Ha, sorry. Carry on.Ha ? I'm talking about Mata.
Those are the facts yeah, let me word it in another way, if we want to become elite like Real, Barcelona, Bayern, Mata wont be good enough in the long term even though he's one of our better players momentarily. Got too little to his game, no pace, no strength, no dribble and beating a player and he's more tidy and neat than really creative. Very good finisher though but wont ever be prolific enough to be a second striker either. Nice player to have a team but also not a game changer.
Is it normal for clubs to let the cotracts of pivotal players to run down to two years left? A moot point anyway, since it seems he is not important to then and they are willing to sell. Maybe even to their title rivals. Would they sell us hazard if he was willing you think?
Exactly. So why should I be excited about buying a meh player from chelsea doing a meh role for us?Clubs letting important players run down to two years? Yeah fairly normal, negotiations tend to start with two years left.
Clearly though Matic isn't a pivotal player. He wouldn't be for us either. We would have to pay upwards of £80m for a pivotal player from Chelsea.
Last year, did we buy one player who does a job?Exactly. So why should I be excited about buying a meh player from chelsea doing a meh role for us?
Chelsea know what they are selling and we are buying someone to do a job. Again. Too many job doing players just might have been the reason why we are so far away from the top you know.
If you ask anyone who were Chelsea's key players last season - the whole defence, the wing backs, Kante, Hazard, Costa, maybe the odd mention of Pedro and Willian....I doubt anyone would say that Matic was key.
Yeah, so key that at the first opportunity they are selling him, kinda like how we sold Scholes and Keane after '99........
Exactly. So why should I be excited about buying a meh player from chelsea doing a meh role for us?
Chelsea know what they are selling and we are buying someone to do a job. Again. Too many job doing players just might have been the reason why we are so far away from the top you know.
May already have been posted. If it isn't simply a rehash of Ogden's story then seems like it might have legs.
Last year, did we buy one player who does a job?
Maybe Mickhi.
Matic if he will be signed will do a job, a job of a DM. In that position he was pretty good. I mean he doesn't need to be flashy and sexy, a job to do is nothing strange.
Did I say it was about his buys last season? We simply have too many of those players in our squad. Darmian, Mkhi, Lingard, Smalling, Jones, Blind, Carrick. Rojo has been a revelation but he still has to show it wasn't a purple patch. We have too many of these and say that hypothetically we want to add Perisic and Matic to that.Last year, did we buy one player who does a job?
Maybe Mickhi.
Matic if he will be signed will do a job, a job of a DM. In that position he was pretty good. I mean he doesn't need to be flashy and sexy, a job to do is nothing strange.
35 premier league appearances - I'd say he was rather important.
35 premier league appearances - I'd say he was rather important.
What the feck is this.He was the only option they had bar Fabregas who can't defend at all, he wasn't important, he was simply the only option Conte had.
Let's hope that season where he flopped together with the rest of the chelsea squad was an anomaly then.Not every player is suited to all managers. Matic may be better utilised under Mourinho than under Conte.
Either Jose knows why he wants exactly Matic or he's crazy and he'll be a terrible signing.But, there is other midfielders we can get who are much better at doing that job. They are also younger so they could do that job for a longer period.
A better point than you have 'fecking' made.What the feck is this.
'He was the only option'A better point than you have 'fecking' made.