WeePat
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2015
- Messages
- 19,788
- Supports
- Chelsea
Does not compute
Let me day dream in peace man. Get back to your Jordan arguments that’s going in circles
Does not compute
Does not compute
Let me day dream in peace man. Get back to your Jordan arguments that’s going in circles
You were the one behind my tagline? Bravo!
Come on, I know you want to join the Jordan conversation of chaotic takes by people saying the same thing while getting angry at each other. It might be my finest contribution to this site (other than @calodo2003 's tagline, that will always be my Mona Lisa)
They have a fantastic roster. Their ring came when they were losing 0-2 against Nets (without Harden) and then Irving got injured while Harden was barely able to run. Still were 1 inch close to losing the tie.It's probably the best head coach behind Spoelstra and Kerr, sacking him would be surprising. Especially when your best player and only superstar missed 11 out of 20 quarters in that first round.
They have a fantastic roster. Their ring came when they were losing 0-2 against Nets (without Harden) and then Irving got injured while Harden was barely able to run. Still were 1 inch close to losing the tie.
Good coach but I think he has send them as far as he can. With this roster and with the best player in the world, they should have been reaching finals every year, not needing other teams to get depleted for them to do so.
I didnt watch the jordan era basketball and I am not disagreeing with jordan being goat and all but other than those 6 championship seasons did he not get beaten other times? Most of them being even before the finals. So surely other players did believe they can beat him. Maybe they didnt believe that they can beat the jordan bulls, I guess.It's not just awards and accomplishments though. Jordan was just better. You all have probably realized over the years that I'm a huge Steph Curry fan (favorite player and all that). But even if Steph won another couple of chips and FMVPs, even 3 or 4, he still wouldn't be better than Jordan. If you didn't see MJ, people just don't get it. He had this aura about him. At his peak, other players just didn't believe they could beat him.
.....and they couldn't
I didnt watch the jordan era basketball and I am not disagreeing with jordan being goat and all but other than those 6 championship seasons did he not get beaten other times? Most of them being even before the finals. So surely other players did believe they can beat him. Maybe they didnt believe that they can beat the jordan bulls, I guess.
I didnt watch the jordan era basketball and I am not disagreeing with jordan being goat and all but other than those 6 championship seasons did he not get beaten other times? Most of them being even before the finals. So surely other players did believe they can beat him. Maybe they didnt believe that they can beat the jordan bulls, I guess.
But than we are judging him by only 6 years? Isn't that too short of a peak? I think at the end of the day having a good team matters. He had that for those 6 years.To be fair he specifically mentioned Jordan's peak, he didn't suggest that Jordan in his early years or retirement years had that aura.
All I mean is that player probably didnt think they can beat peak jordan bulls but they would fancy beating him on some other teams.Those early Bulls teams were really, really, really bad. The only player I remember other than Jordan was Orlando Woolridge (sp?) from those first few seasons. Plus, I think Jordan was hurt in season 2 or 3. Around 88 or 89 Pippen and Grant got drafted and once they had a year or two to mature it was game over for the league.
The Wizard years do not count and will not be spoken of.
But than we are judging him by only 6 years? Isn't that too short of a peak? I think at the end of the day having a good team matters. He had that for those 6 years.
No 6 years isn't a short peak and his peak started a bit earlier, it's roughly 10 years. For nearly half of it, he had a genuinely bad team around him but was still unplayable. Now I don't fully agree with @WI_Red simply because during his peak Isiah Thomas and the Pistons definitely thought that they had a chance, Bird definitely thought that he had a chance and the Lakers definitely thought that they had a chance.
Jordan peak was largely played while competing with all time greats and all time great teams.
Yo, Deuce… Get your dad’s iPad redirected on this exact tweet before he warms up… thanks!
Uhm...are you talking to yourself?Thanks, bro!
Uhm...are you talking to yourself?
Uhm...are you talking to yourself?
Not to quibble , but @charlton66 was the one who made the comment that other players did not think they could beat MJ. However, I do agree that was the case in some of the finals (especially the Jazz series. MJ consumed Malone's basketball soul). It was a big deal in 91 when MJ and the Bulls swept the Pistons, with Jordan completely dominating that series. That said, I remember the Piston's looking absolutely shattered.
When the bulls took them to game 7 in '90 the pistons knew that would be the last time they had a chance against themIt was a big deal in 91 when MJ and the Bulls swept the Pistons, with Jordan completely dominating that series. That said, I remember the Piston's looking absolutely shattered.
Tatum and Ja are chopped liver?Most other contenders don’t have that except Denver. There are more balanced rosters like Celtics and Memphis but then without the genuine superstar.
Bucks have a pretty strong roster for this era - I don’t see how anyone can argue otherwise.
They have an all-time top 25 player at his peak, and three other top-50 players in the league in Jrue, Brook and Middleton.
Most other contenders don’t have that except Denver. There are more balanced rosters like Celtics and Memphis but then without the genuine superstar.
While the Bucks have a great roster, I don't agree with it being unique.
I would say that both Tatum and Ja would count as superstars.
Phoenix runs out 2 hall of famers and another almost superstar
Philly has the likely MVP and Maxey/Harden/Harris is at least as potent as Middleton/Jrue/Brook
The Lakers have 2 top 10-15 guys and a bunch of really good role players.
I know I'm missing some, but my lunch break is up and no time to ponder further
Those early Bulls teams were really, really, really bad. The only player I remember other than Jordan was Orlando Woolridge (sp?) from those first few seasons. Plus, I think Jordan was hurt in season 2 or 3. Around 88 or 89 Pippen and Grant got drafted and once they had a year or two to mature it was game over for the league.
The Wizard years do not count and will not be spoken of.
overratedAnd a certain guy named Phil Jackson was hired.
Today Philly has the better trio, if Middleton regain his past form then the Bucks are on an other level largely due to being better defensively.
Tobias Harris is barely a positive player, and Maxey had a good season but until recently, he was compared with Simons, Poole, Herro who are all flawed young players.
Let’s not forget that the Bucks comfortably had the best record in the regular season.
That's Dirk erasureTatum and especially Ja are not yet at the elite level of superstars that win Championships. The Mavs in 2011 are the only team in recent history to win without a clear top-5 player and an all-time top-30 player from DWade, Kobe, Duncan, Lebron, Steph, Giannis, Kawhi.
That's Dirk erasure
While the Bucks have a great roster, I don't agree with it being unique.
I would say that both Tatum and Ja would count as superstars.
Phoenix runs out 2 hall of famers and another almost superstar
Philly has the likely MVP and Maxey/Harden/Harris is at least as potent as Middleton/Jrue/Brook
The Lakers have 2 top 10-15 guys and a bunch of really good role players.
I know I'm missing some, but my lunch break is up and no time to ponder further
Yeah, I'm talking about Booker. He has only made one all NBA team in his career (21-22), and maybe a second one this year? That is why I said almost superstar, he is on the cusp, but for me "Superstar" means top 10-15 in the league. He's close, and maybe he's in it, but maybe not. Hence "almost".Who is the almost superstar that Phoenix has? Because if you are referring to the one who is currently 2nd in PPG in the playoffs, he was first team All-NBA last season and a superstar already. He would be All-NBA again if he didn't miss a ton of games this season too.
One can also include the Warriors too, especially now that they are healthy. The Bucks are great and should not have lost but they aren't far and away better than others. No team can make that argument at this moment.
Yeah, I'm talking about Booker. He has only made one all NBA team in his career (21-22), and maybe a second one this year? That is why I said almost superstar, he is on the cusp, but for me "Superstar" means top 10-15 in the league. He's close, and maybe he's in it, but maybe not. Hence "almost".