Mykhaylo Mudryk

Mudryk doesn’t worry me. He looks good when a manager plays him. We need a decent manager and a striker.

Guy has 2 assists and barely played and gets slated on here.

Anthony and Sancho have combined 2 assists. Yet someone bizarrely claimed Anthony is the best 60m+ signing.
 
WeePat said:
He should, definitely. Felix should be nowhere near the starting lineup.
Click to expand...

Indeed, the numerous rumours in the press suggesting that Chelsea want to sign him permanently are ludicrous. Or maybe they aren’t, given Boehly’s current spending record.
 
MayosNoun said:
Mudryk doesn’t worry me. He looks good when a manager plays him. We need a decent manager and a striker.

Guy has 2 assists and barely played and gets slated on here.

Anthony and Sancho have combined 2 assists. Yet someone bizarrely claimed Anthony is the best 60m+ signing.
Click to expand...


Sancho is a complete dud I agree but Antony has scored important goals for us and we are a much better team when he's playing. It's not fair to put him along with mudryk.
 
The more he plays the more delighted arsenal fans get.

He looks absolutely shite. 8 year contract!
 
Brwned said:
Definitely looked like another Robben / Hazard type - somewhere in between. Good for the league to have some new exciting players, and it’s easy not to be jealous with our current options on the left…
Click to expand...

Don’t know what this guy was talking about, he looks hopeless
 
dannyrhinos89 said:
Sancho is a complete dud I agree but Antony has scored important goals for us and we are a much better team when he's playing. It's not fair to put him along with mudryk.
Click to expand...

Putting him alongside Mudryk is so ridiculous at this point I'm impressed you managed that civilized an answer! :D
 
Chief123 said:
The more he plays the more delighted arsenal fans get.

He looks absolutely shite. 8 year contract!
Click to expand...
Edu and Arteta should get sued for even thinking about bringing him in. :nervous:
 
MayosNoun said:
Mudryk doesn’t worry me. He looks good when a manager plays him. We need a decent manager and a striker.

Guy has 2 assists and barely played and gets slated on here.

Anthony and Sancho have combined 2 assists. Yet someone bizarrely claimed Anthony is the best 60m+ signing.
Click to expand...
Mudryk is absolutely dreadful mate. He makes Sancho look like a bargain never mind Antony.
 
I find the reactions to his performances a bit baffling honestly. Chelsea obviously have a fecktonne of problems but I'm far less worried about Mudryk than I am about Raheem Sterling.
 
He had a couple of good moments tonight. He might turn out a flop. He might be brilliant. Whatever. The redcafe habit of rushing to write off new signings insanely quickly will never cease to amaze. Almost as knee jerk as their rush to make over the top proclamations of brilliance after a few good performances, early on in their PL career. Yes, I’m talking about Joao Felix. Who currently has less assists than Mudryk despite playing many more minutes.
 
Soon Dan James is going to have start threatening people with legal action for slander.
 
One of the biggest wastes of money I think a premiership team has ever made. He’s beyond dreadful and would probably struggle in the Championship. Didn’t they sign him on some ridiculous contract as well!
 
Barthez said:
One of the biggest wastes of money I think a premiership team has ever made. He’s beyond dreadful and would probably struggle in the Championship. Didn’t they sign him on some ridiculous contract as well!
Click to expand...

Congratulations on getting the gold star for Most Incorrect Post of the Day (non-Barcelona edition)
 
In the few games I have seen, both Chelsea and Ukraine, he looks like an amateur that won a contest to play with a professional team. I don't even see a glimmer there.
 
Frosty said:
Just think about the competition for that prize over the last 30 years. Mudryk should not be anywhere near the list.
Click to expand...

On top of that, just think about the competition amongst Chelsea players out there tonight! Cucurella is miles worse, has been here for the whole season instead of joining after not playing for months, doesn't have a war going on in his homeland affecting his personal life, etc etc etc
 
TheMagicFoolBus said:
Congratulations on getting the gold star for Most Incorrect Post of the Day (non-Barcelona edition)
Click to expand...
He had less than 50 pro appearances before you spunk all that money on him. He needs to drastically improve in the next season cause all he's shown so far is that he's extremely fast.
 
Way too early to be calling him one of the worst signings ever or totally writing him off.

He's looked very poor so far though.
 
GifLord said:
He had less than 50 pro appearances before you spunk all that money on him. He needs to drastically improve in the next season cause all he's shown so far is that he's extremely fast.
Click to expand...

I'll have you know he's currently leading the team in PL assists. It's also completely ludicrous to write him off after 537 total minutes for Chelsea when he joined a team in complete chaos having not played football for months.

Strootman's Finger said:
I don't think this will work in your favor
Click to expand...

Mate - glimmers is all he's shown. If you want to argue that he's been inconsistent I certainly wouldn't argue.
 
The fee was extortionate (as it was with pretty much all Chelsea's recent signings) but I'm withholding judgement for now. He makes Rashford look slow so even if he is lacking technically, he could cause havoc playing on the shoulder of the last defender. And he is clearly not remotely confident at present- he may be a better technician when he relaxes and the team finds a bit of stability.
 
Looks like a load of raw ingredients thrown together at the moment. Pretty much what you'd expect from a kid playing in the Ukrainian league. The only problem is they paid way too much for those ingredients, and now he and Chelsea have to labour under the pressure of that.

I wouldn't say it's a no hoper though. Sometimes he shows a nice touch, or bursts past someone and you think there could be a player there. He just has no idea how to put it all together and be effective at this level, but Chelsea isn't the easiest place to shine this season either. I think you have to give him all of next season to start assessing him, because even though he's priced like a finished product, he's simply not.
 
He's been a disappointment so far but it's a weird time for his thread to blow up like this, he's not really done anything wrong tonight or against Brighton.

Yes I know that's still not great for a £62m signing before anyone says.
 
Dancfc said:
He's been a disappointment so far but it's a weird time for his thread to blow up like this, he's not really done anything wrong tonight or against Brighton.

Yes I know that's still not great for a £62m signing before anyone says.
Click to expand...
Ey? He didn’t do anything right today. Everything was wrong. Looked shot to pieces at times.
 
It's a signing that seems like a throwback to before everything was so globalised and scouting networks in many clubs weren't nearly as large or thorough. When players would often have a chance of a move to a much bigger club just by playing well against them in Europe, or in 2-3 high profile club/international games. Most of those transfers weren't for huge money (relatively) though.
 
Terrible, terrible player. That he was ever allowed to put on football boots should be the subject of an international inquiry. How his mother can even live with herself having brought him in to this world I do not know.
 
DOTA said:
Terrible, terrible player. That he was ever allowed to put on football boots should be the subject of an international inquiry. How his mother can even live with herself having brought him in to this world I do not know.
Click to expand...
:confused:
 
Looks like a 5 a side player who has never played on a full sized football pitch.
 
TheMagicFoolBus said:
I find the reactions to his performances a bit baffling honestly. Chelsea obviously have a fecktonne of problems but I'm far less worried about Mudryk than I am about Raheem Sterling.
Click to expand...
Raheem was always going to be a dud. He looked poor at times for City who dominate most games and he came being notorious for missing sitters. I got slated at the time for saying Werner is a superior player. Yet we miss Werner, Sterling contributes nothing.
 
You have to look at the decision making of whoever guided him to pick Chelsea. A player like this needs to be slowly drip fed minutes into a structured, stable and mature team, like CR7 was when he first came here. This is the complete opposite to what Chelsea is. everyone seems to be looking to the next man for guidance and direction, including the manager and owner.

This is ultimately why I always thought the Chelsea project would fail. Not because the players are bad or lack potential, just too many wild cards.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.