hellhunter
Eurofighter
ThankfullyYou say Mykhaylo. And I say Mykgoodbye.
…my work here is done.
ThankfullyYou say Mykhaylo. And I say Mykgoodbye.
…my work here is done.
Convenient way for Chelsea to terminate his contract. Just so happened to be an underperforming, expensive dud.
Chelsea will sue him for lost income like they did with Mutu and I’m pretty sure that contracts have break clauses to protect clubs in case of players failing doping tests. No chance they won’t have those in place, especially with the lawyers these clubs employ.100k per week for 8 and a half years... Todd Boehly must have dropped a P Diddy in his drink.
I mean surely it makes sense that’s when someone would take performance enhancing pills? I mean you’re not taking viagra if you’ve got a hard on without it, are you?The fact that a person took performance enhancing drugs, while they have been struggling to raise their performance level for quite a while, does bear some element of irony. I wonder if others might have noticed that.
Didn't that take like 14 years to shake out?Chelsea will sue him for lost income like they did with Mutu and I’m pretty sure that contracts have break clauses to protect clubs in case of players failing doping tests. No chance they won’t have those in place, especially with the lawyers these clubs employ.
I was just joking around. But regarding your example, people do so all the time.I mean surely it makes sense that’s when someone would take performance enhancing pills? I mean you’re not taking viagra if you’ve got a hard on without it, are you?
I'm sure they welcome a legal battle, complete disappearance of any resale value and writing off over 70 million euros on him. That is a very reasonable reaction.Chelsea will be absolutely delighted at this news as it probably gives them grounds to terminate his 9 year contract!
I am glad that you are not my financial advisor.Chelsea will be absolutely delighted at this news as it probably gives them grounds to terminate his 9 year contract!
Chelsea will be absolutely delighted at this news as it probably gives them grounds to terminate his 9 year contract!
Performance wise, I don't believe that's true. Mudryk had been more useful for us than Antony had been for United imo, certainly until this season. He's only been playing in the conference league this season, so can't really gain or learn anything from scoring against that level of opposition but last season, watching both players, the eye test was telling Mudryk was playing better football and the stats for both of them kind of support this.
Obviously when you introduce a failed doping test and a potential lengthy ban into the equation, then the scales tip heavily in favour of Antony.
Performance diminishing drugs?
Should have done as Liverpool players and just stick to the inhalers.Performance diminishing drugs?
Just for discussion's sake, Antony was 'good' and a fairly regular contributor to ETH's first season where we achieved our highest points tally (bar Mourinho) and won a cup. Last year he was shite and in the current one used very sparingly but he may have an opportunity to contribute at the RWB spot given his recent promising cameos. Antony's best assets are his work rate, ball retention, close ball control and ability to progress the ball; most of his work in done between the boxes but of course he has very little productivity i.e he's a progressive player and not a final ball one. What's Mudryk done for you thus far or could have in the future given his qualities?
By the way I know it's a very low bar as ideally we'll want to move on from Antony as he's certainly not worth the transfer fee but it is what it is for us and I assume the same for you (pre-drug test)?