Prodigy24
Full Member
He's quick, he's fast, and he's got pace, and that's pretty much it.
Same as Antony. Sod allWhat is it that he does that justifies that almost £90million price tag?
He's quick, he's fast, and he's got pace, and that's pretty much it.
Same as Antony. Sod all
He's quick, he's fast, and he's got pace, and that's pretty much it.
As an arsenal fan I cannot be more thankful that we missed out on this guy. He can be electric on his day but the vast majority of the time he is absolutely poor and predictable. He's like St Maximum who would have 1 very good game every 6 games or so but Mudryk has not had a single good game yet and the only good signs he's shown was his first game against Milner at fullback, he's yet to match that level of play even again.
All I keep hearing is how he should be given time but if you cost 80mil, how much time do you need to even be average?
I love that quote. Was it Apres Match that first used it or someone else?
I mean say what you want about Antony but he’s at least chipped in with few important goals here and there last season.The comparisons are very apt. Although, I would say that Antony is the more useful out of the two from what I've seen. I think. I don't even know anymore.
Mudryk wishes he could dribble like Adama.Ukrainian Adama.
There was legit a guy arguing this a few pages back after a single pre-season goal.Mbappe regen.
Top 6 is highly doubtful given their poor showing in the second half of last season.Okay, I withdraw my preseason prediction of Chelsea finishing in the top six. They won't.
Okay, I withdraw my preseason prediction of Chelsea finishing in the top six. They won't.
Top 6 is highly doubtful given their poor showing in the second half of last season.
The team hardly has any improvement from last season.
There was legit a guy arguing this a few pages back after a single pre-season goal.
this Mbappe comparison will live forever on the caf
This is pretty much the norm when he's not up against a 37 year old James Milner at RB.He looked exciting on his debut. Has he really regressed this badly?
Right... with only 5% of the season being played so far...
It's 5% already?!? 20 times what we have so far and season will be over
Antony is a far better player, come on. Not even close.The comparisons are very apt. Although, I would say that Antony is the more useful out of the two from what I've seen. I think. I don't even know anymore.
Antony is a far better player, come on. Not even close.
Antony is like a ... Top half PL to Europa League level right winger, with the potential to be an important player for a regular top 4 level. Mudryk isn't a PL level winger at this point. feck knows his potential, but he needs a lower league loan.If knife held to arse, I would take Antony over Mudryk.
Antony is a far better player, come on. Not even close.
Silly post.I have come to conclusion that Antony is not even a player...forget far better than anyone. .75million down the drain ...Antony.
You'll get to know Amadeus. Not understand him, no one does.There was legit a guy arguing this a few pages back after a single pre-season goal.
You should revisit and probably change your eyes and criteria and everything.I have come to conclusion that Antony is not even a player...forget far better than anyone. .75million down the drain ...Antony.
To be honest I won't be too surprise if Arteta and Edu bring him to Emirate next season on loan with option to buy.As an arsenal fan I cannot be more thankful that we missed out on this guy. He can be electric on his day but the vast majority of the time he is absolutely poor and predictable. He's like St Maximum who would have 1 very good game every 6 games or so but Mudryk has not had a single good game yet and the only good signs he's shown was his first game against Milner at fullback, he's yet to match that level of play even again.
All I keep hearing is how he should be given time but if you cost 80mil, how much time do you need to even be average?
I love that quote. Was it Apres Match that first used it or someone else?