Drifter
American
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2004
- Messages
- 68,483
Given another season and the money the club is now prepared to splash around. Moyes would have got us into the cherished top four.
If Moyes had ANY chance to succeed here, he should have revamped he entire squad by signing at least 6-7 players, but he chose to go on holiday and dithered when he got back.Given another season and the money the club is now prepared to splash around. Moyes would have got us into the cherished top four.
Exactly. 'These fecking players are letting him down' was uttered a lot last season, fast forward a year and the same players have been playing excellent football for the last couple of months and enjoying very good results - with some of the most criticised players from last season playing vital parts. The disrespect towards our players, all of them title winners, last season was quite sad actually. A lot of people actually had more faith in Moyes than our squad.
Given another season and the money the club is now prepared to splash around. Moyes would have got us into the cherished top four.
Just had another thought.
Moyes could completely revolutionize Spannish football in much the same way Guardiola did with European football. We now have teams across europe trying to imitate this Tiki Taka stuff as it proved successful.
Spain has never really seen Moyes' brand of percentage football before and he has already beaten Barcelona with it.
Imagine in 5 years time Barcelona and Madrid could be playing 424 with 6ft 6in strikers and centre halves that can lump it great distances. If the long ball isnt on the just punt it to the wingers to whip it in 92 times a game.
He tried. It was very difficult for him and any manager put into that situation would have failed. It wasn't all his fault.
Hey man I've already tried to back track on this, got quoted a million times before I could editI think Mourinho would've won the title last year.
He'd make 2-3 new additions and he would command the respect of all players from day 1. He is Mourinho, after all.
He would devise tactics for each game, designed to beat teams who have better players than ours.
When LVG arrived, the player confidence was rock bottom. Moyes had publicly stated that he could not work with the existing set of players and that he needed a new team. They had become used to getting beat by Man City, Everton, LFC, etc. And it took a while for LVG to instill the confidence in our players to play big teams in the league and attempt to win.
Moyes was an experiment (by Fergie) which failed. When Moyes was fired, Fergie was not consulted. When LVG was appointed, Fergie was not consulted. Basically, the Glazers decided that they needed a big name with a proven reputation of winning at the highest level.
It does amaze me that the Glazers went along with Fergie's recommendation, so blindly. They could've hired an intern and after 5 hours of internet research, they'd have known that Moyes was not a top manager and would be a huge risk.
Given another season and the money the club is now prepared to splash around. Moyes would have got us into the cherished top four.
Given another season and the money the club is now prepared to splash around. Moyes would have got us into the cherished top four.
Though his departure was no surprise, it did leave a slight feeling of 'what are we doing'?
I supported his appointment, as you would any new manager, even though he was not even on my list of potential managers. However, I do feel that if we compare LVG to Moyes you see the difference between a man that has a vision and a clear strategy to get there vs. somebody that probably had a vision, but had no clarity of how he was going to get there.
I am not sure whether Moyes got sabotaged by certain players, but we looked clueless, had no passion and really had no leadership. I certainly now look at it as a wasted year.
Give to Moyes a few years and a few hindred of millions and he would have achieved to get into top 4. The same can probbaly be said about me, to be fair.Undoubtedly. I mean that. The “Moyes is the worst manager in history” brigade will disagree, of course, but they're somewhat dim to begin with.
But there's a ceiling to any manager's potential – and I don't think the idea that Moyes' ceiling was/is simply too low is ridiculous. It takes something special to manage a behemoth like United – something beyond the qualities which makes you a good manager as such. You need a bit of star quality, I think. One way or the other. Don't think Moyes has that – or that he'll ever get it.
But top four? Of course he would've made top four given time and resources. If he had survived he would've made top four – easily, in fact. But anything beyond that? Who knows. It's that ceiling thing again.
What the hell are you all on about?
David Moyes manager of United? Are you all high?
On a side note, it was brilliant of the English FA to suspend all football for a year in respect of SAF resigning, I'm glad we appointed LVG to replace him.
Fail not probably, but not a huge succes either. I could imagine him doing reasonably well, like top 4 every year in a three year spell, maybe the odd title or cup. But it's normal for any organisations that when a very big man leaves, there is transitional period, when a necesseraly weaker figure has to take over. Pope Francis didn't succeed JPII directly, Napoleon didn't come right after Louis XIV, after Thatcher there was John Major.The best thing for me about Moyes was that me defending him got me 10 likes and promoted from the Newbs.
I do sometimes wonder if the club hired him KNOWING that whoever suceeded SAF would fail.
Give to Moyes a few years and a few hindred of millions and he would have achieved to get into top 4. The same can probbaly be said about me, to be fair.
A big difference between Moyes and Van Gaal: last season on 12 games against 6 teams that finished above us we got an incredible amount of points, 6 points. Scored 5 goals, conceded 21. This season against the same teams: played 10 matches and we got 22 points. Scored 18, conceded 7.
So yeah, ladies and gentlemen, we should have sticked with Moyes. Forever. Because his ceiling wasn't too low.
He wasn't an idiot, and is a good manager. Just nowhere good enough for a club that aspires to win trophies every year and pretty much wants guaranteed UCL football.Fer feck's sake, mate - I said his ceiling in all probability was too low.
My beef ain't with those who claim Moyes wasn't right for us – but with those who think he was an utter idiot. He wasn't – and he isn't.
Do you realize that you base this on absolutely nothing? Van Gaal has not only strengthened the team, he has managed to squeeze A LOT more from most players who were bad under Moyes.Given another season and the money the club is now prepared to splash around. Moyes would have got us into the cherished top four.
Do you realize that you base this on absolutely nothing? Van Gaal has not only strengthened the team, he has managed to squeeze A LOT more from most players who were bad under Moyes.
I don't think he was "the manager we needed after Ferguson", I do however think that he was the manager we needed before Van Gaal.
By that I mean: How receptive to Van Gaal, his style of play and the inevitable adjustment period would we have been off the back of a title winning season rather than him taking on a massive repair job and the patience and hope that comes with that?
All press conferences
It's not based on absolutely nothing.
Even though his time in charge was excruciating, I do miss him as a person and an underdog. We all wanted it to work, the 'chosen one' banner was semi-ironic but also a symbol of an adventurous gamble that ultimately blew up in the club's face.
While unlikely i'll admit it was certainly possible, but then what?
He would have never won the league or probably even challenged for it. It's highly unlikely he would have never won the Champions League either.
So even if we came top 4 every year (while playing Moyes dreary brand of football), what exactly would have been the point of keeping him in charge?
It's not based on absolutely nothing.
We're talking top four here – whether Moyes would've managed to get us top four in his second season.
Given Moyes' general qualities as a manager – the same qualities which made him a plausible candidate for the board to begin with – and given our transfer budget, it's surely not unreasonable to think he would've managed top four this season. Look at the feckin' opposition. It's hardly terrifying.
If Moyes had survived, he would've known that top four was an absolute minimum this season. If he had survived, he would've been less timid this season – he would've done much more to make the team his own.
This is an absurdly hypothetical discussion, but if we're giving it a go, let's not get positively stupid – Moyes isn't a terrible manager. He knows how to set up a functional side. That's enough, given our resources, to construct a top four side in today's Premier League. Again, look at the opposition – do you think it requires a genius to make Manchester United finish 4th in the PL? It's what lies beyond this bare minimum which matters. That's where the difference between someone like Moyes and someone like our Aloysius comes into play.
My feelings havent changed. Moyes was the wrong manager, appointed for the wrong reasons, at the wrong time. He was doomed to failure from pretty much the day he took over.
We tried to replace Fergie by finding another Fergie - someone with a similar personality, similar attributes, strengths and weaknesses etc. The problem was, we didnt need another Fergie.
Fergie came in and built an empire. He took the club from a pretty weak position and made it into a global powerhouse.
When Moyes came in, we didnt need an empire builder, we needed someone who could come in and steady the ship. This meant we needed someone established who could deal with the pressures and egos involved with managing a huge club. Make no mistake, I am sure that if a fresh faced Fergie was appointed from Aberdeen last year instead of Moyes, he would have met a similar fate.
What I didnt expect was how dramatically out of his depth Moyes would really be. It seemed painfully obvious from almost the first day - the cheesy pictures of him arriving and settling in at his new office, the interviews about how privileged and lucky he felt to be here. It was all nice sounding, but it sent out completely the wrong message, of someone who was fortunate to be here, who had no experience at this sort of level and was just so happy to be given his big chance. Very good Dave - but keep it to yourself. It sends the wrong message out to the players, the staff, the club, the fans and the media.