What's this then?
New season of that Apprentice show. Dave doesn't even bother wearing a tie, what a scruffy bastard.
What's this then?
They tried to get a word with him after his meeting with Cartwright in London and he made a run for it.
That's our David running from Sky's questions earlier today in London.
The video is above. He's running away from SSN tonight.
New season of that Apprentice show. Dave doesn't even bother wearing a tie, what a scruffy bastard.
Surprised at how negative you've been towards this Phil.
Mourinho's a sure bet when it comes to success on the pitch. Not saying I want Mou, just saying I think he's the only one that could really handle it and push us on.
I don't give a shit where he's going as long as he gets the feck out of Madrid. I'm fed up with this clown now.
Only yesterday he came out saying that as long as he is a manager for Madrid, Lopez would be in goal... Never have I seen a professional manager holding a club ransom like he is doing now at the expense of a club legend.
Then Pepe came out defending Casillas saying that Casillas wasn't the bad guy in this whole affair and Mourinho replied that Pepe said that only because he's frustrated by Varane being a better defender.
He can feck right off, seriously.
Short term success aye, but long term he's a liability and has a tendency to leave the club in a shite position. I mean look at this from our Madrid fan Vato,
It's the sort of exit you can predict with Mourinho, he is such a dominant and decisive manager that when things start to go wrong the issues are magnified. I actually like him as a bloke and find him entertaining, but he isn't the right fit for a club like United.
He also tends to spend alot of money on players in their prime which isn't sustainable, I mean the position he left Inter in was a joke in terms of their players ages. There is very little long term investment in players who need real development and he doesn't focus on the club's youth team.
Short term success aye, but long term he's a liability and has a tendency to leave the club in a shite position. I mean look at this from our Madrid fan Vato,
He actually ran? Hahaha that's brilliant.
You know what, today I've really come round to Moyes. I've even found myself calling him 'Dave', who doesn't love a good underdog story!
It's also a plus, for me, that he hates Suarez.
Instead of telling them to feck off and ignore them, he ran away. Class.
I don't rate Moyes tbh, never have. So yeah, not been a great day.
That's not what Fergie would do.
It's the situation that requires a big name not the club. We need someone with experience and knowledge of winning titles to secure the clubs future short term over what will be a very bumpy few years. We're seemingly going a different route and going for the unproven road which could make the bumpy few years even worse. I think it's an unwarranted risk and could easily backfire. That's not to say a big name won't also crumble under the pressure of replacing Ferguson, but its a huge, huge ask for a relatively unproven manager to take on.
Oh, I agree completely. Fergie had excellent results to show, the Cup Winner's Cup not least.
This thing is just going round in circles now, though. "Moyes has never won anything." "No, but he's never had a proper chance to do so either." "Yeah, but he could've at least beaten Liverpool at Anfield a couple of times." "Sure, but it proves nothing that he hasn't." And so on.
Nobody denies the man has no (major) trophies to his name. Pointing that out over and over again, however, won't change the fact that Fergie clearly sees something in him. If there's anything Fergie has excelled at over the years it's spotting potential where others couldn't. To me it means a great deal that he backs Moyes. It means a lot more than the fact Moyes hasn't won anything. He has been at Everton for more than a decade, there's not much he could have won apart from the odd cup (and that, as we have been over, isn't easy - the one cup which actually means something has been dominated almost completely by the big teams during his tenure at Goodison).
I'll repeat one final point before I go to bed: Hiring a manager is a matter of selecting the man who is best suited for the part, pure and simple. Except it ain't simple, of course. It's a gamble of sorts no matter who you go for. What it is not, however, is a matter of picking the biggest name on the list and hire him - misguidedly believing that a huge club by necessity needs to hire a huge name. Once more, look at what Barca did with Guardiola. He didn't have a trophy to his name when he put the pen to the paper. You can't win anything big unless someone has faith in you and gives you a break.
Good night.
Post of the year, well done.
Well, these are legitimate concerns. It is a risk, certainly. Sometimes you have to risk it, though. And what realistic alternatives do we have that are less risky?
I think people are overlooking something crucial here: The club (the Glazers, Gill, Charlton, Fergie not least) clearly don't want a revolution. They want a man who can carry on what Fergie has created in terms of structure and method. Perhaps they're wrong. Perhaps we should turn the whole thing upside down, try something completely different. But like it or not they obviously want to keep the basics - which in fairness seem to work fairly well. Fergie has done alright, to make the understatement of the century.
Would Mourinho, for instance, be keen on simply perpetuating Fergie's methods? I don't think so. Ancelotti? Hardly, I'd say. Would any big name be happy to have Fergie on board as a mentor of sorts? Can't really see that. Moyes would, though. Now, again, perhaps this strategy isn't the right one - perhaps the Glazers are better off forcing Fergie to retire completely, focus solely on his horses and never meddle at all. But that isn't what they have in mind - they do want him to stick around in a more hands-on role. Given this, who is better suited for the job than Moyes? That seems to be the question.
I think he's a very good manager personally. Not as big as you'd like for a club of this size but I think he'll come in and steady the ship.
I don't anticipate winning the league again in the next couple of years (especially if Mourinho returns to Chelsea) but I expect he'll do a good job and keep us competetive.
Then if we want to change it after a couple of years it will be much easier for someone else to come in and move the club forward.
Obviously it'll be a bonus if Moyes turns out to be amazing like!
O'Neill is the man for the job
When the time comes
Oh, I agree completely. Fergie had excellent results to show, the Cup Winner's Cup not least.
This thing is just going round in circles now, though. "Moyes has never won anything." "No, but he's never had a proper chance to do so either." "Yeah, but he could've at least beaten Liverpool at Anfield a couple of times." "Sure, but it proves nothing that he hasn't." And so on.
Nobody denies the man has no (major) trophies to his name. Pointing that out over and over again, however, won't change the fact that Fergie clearly sees something in him. If there's anything Fergie has excelled at over the years it's spotting potential where others couldn't. To me it means a great deal that he backs Moyes. It means a lot more than the fact Moyes hasn't won anything. He has been at Everton for more than a decade, there's not much he could have won apart from the odd cup (and that, as we have been over, isn't easy - the one cup which actually means something has been dominated almost completely by the big teams during his tenure at Goodison).
I'll repeat one final point before I go to bed: Hiring a manager is a matter of selecting the man who is best suited for the part, pure and simple. Except it ain't simple, of course. It's a gamble of sorts no matter who you go for. What it is not, however, is a matter of picking the biggest name on the list and hire him - misguidedly believing that a huge club by necessity needs to hire a huge name. Once more, look at what Barca did with Guardiola. He didn't have a trophy to his name when he put the pen to the paper. You can't win anything big unless someone has faith in you and gives you a break.
Good night.
So this is what we're expecting from our new manager? Steady the ship a bit (we've just won the title), not expected to win anything and maybe in a few years time we'll get someone better in to move the club forward?
Well why didn't someone say something sooner? I'm officially excited now.
feck me, are we Spurs?
It's a unique set of circumstances Nev. I don't think it's realistic to expect someone to come in and dominate the league and, frankly, I'm just hoping it isn't a disaster.
I'm hoping that too, but surely we should be expecting more than "not being a disaster" from a Manchester United managerial appointment.
I really hope Moyes proves me wrong, he seems a decent guy and has done a superb job at Everton. If he gets this chance and takes it then fair play, but this is scary shit that we seem content with a couple of years of someone simply steadying the ship.
It's a unique set of circumstances Nev. I don't think it's realistic to expect someone to come in and dominate the league and, frankly, I'm just hoping it isn't a disaster.
I'm hoping that too, but surely we should be expecting more than "not being a disaster" from a Manchester United managerial appointment.
I really hope Moyes proves me wrong, he seems a decent guy and has done a superb job at Everton. If he gets this chance and takes it then fair play, but this is scary shit that we seem content with a couple of years of someone simply steadying the ship.
Well, these are legitimate concerns. It is a risk, certainly. Sometimes you have to risk it, though. And what realistic alternatives do we have that are less risky?
I think people are overlooking something crucial here: The club (the Glazers, Gill, Charlton, Fergie not least) clearly don't want a revolution. They want a man who can carry on what Fergie has created in terms of structure and method. Perhaps they're wrong. Perhaps we should turn the whole thing upside down, try something completely different. But like it or not they obviously want to keep the basics - which in fairness seem to work fairly well. Fergie has done alright, to make the understatement of the century.
Would Mourinho, for instance, be keen on simply perpetuating Fergie's methods? I don't think so. Ancelotti? Hardly, I'd say. Would any big name be happy to have Fergie on board as a mentor of sorts? Can't really see that. Moyes would, though. Now, again, perhaps this strategy isn't the right one - perhaps the Glazers are better off forcing Fergie to retire completely, focus solely on his horses and never meddle at all. But that isn't what they have in mind - they do want him to stick around in a more hands-on role. Given this, who is better suited for the job than Moyes? That seems to be the question.
How many finals has moyes got to? Even Redknapp has won a trophy and Martinez has got Wigan to a final.
Moyes will be the end of United. Fergie backed mcleish, says enough about him spotting talent.
How many finals has moyes got to? Even Redknapp has won a trophy and Martinez has got Wigan to a final.
Moyes will be the end of United. Fergie backed mcleish, says enough about him spotting talent.
Good post, fatboy. Post of the year.
The appointment of Moyes feels like no different than if we hire Hodgson, or even O'Neill, in terms of playing style. There's just nothing special in there to separate them.
You have not seen a lot of Everton if you actually believe that.
May, 2001.
Sir Alex Ferguson believes Celtic manager Martin O'Neill would be the ideal man to succeed his reign at Old Trafford.
Ferguson, who will sever all links with United at the end of next season, sees the former Leicester City manager and Northern Ireland captain as the perfect candidate for the job.
"Martin's a no-nonsense manager - just what you need at a big club. You don't mess this man around," he told the News of the World.
"Any recognition and praise that Martin gets is deserved. For him to go to Celtic and change it all around in one season is remarkable.
"I have to say I thought he would do that because he is a good organiser and a great believer in team spirit.
"He is a no-nonsense manager who is strong and has a personality and I think those qualities are important at a big club like Celtic.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/m/man_utd/1340732.stm