Irwinwastheking
Gimpier than Alex and Feeky
Would be nice for United to appoint a manager who has at least won a trophy... or got to a final of ANY competition.
FA cup
Would be nice for United to appoint a manager who has at least won a trophy... or got to a final of ANY competition.
Would be nice for United to appoint a manager who has at least won a trophy... or got to a final of ANY competition.
Dortmund have been excellent playing against Europe's elite.
2009 FA cup finalist
Alex McLeish.
No one will agree with me, but I think in the right league he will be a great manager
Would be nice for United to appoint a manager who has at least won a trophy... or got to a final of ANY competition.
Alex McLeish won a league cup. We should have gone for him.
Irwinwastheking said:In your opinion. But in your opinion you don't see the tremendous over achievement at Everton as something worthy of an opportunity. Plenty do though.
Irwinwastheking said:Only an idiot would, and City are much like a lot of our more muppety supporters and would only appoint a fancy name. Chelsea the same.
Will Phil Neville come with him I wonder?
edit: In a coaching role obviously.
Really it's ok, we're not the first manager in the world to appoint a manager who hasn't won a trophy.
Barcelona appointed Pep Guardiola.
Juventus appointed Conte who only won Seria B.
Moyes is more established than them when they were going for the big job. Doesn't mean that Moyes is going to be a very big success, but there's no guarantee of success with anyother manager. Even the Caf favorite Mourinho did average with an extremely assembled squad at Real.
David Moyes consistently finishing upper mid-table is an over-achievement worthy of a chance to take over Manchester United? I genuinely have no idea how anyone can come to that conclusion, it's ludicrous. I don't think he's done enough to warrant a chance at the likes of Arsenal, never mind United.
It doesn't make you a muppet to think that one of the biggest clubs in the world shouldn't appoint a mid-table manager.
This season...
They got shafted by Marseille, Arsenal and Olympiacos last year
The only decent consolation I could think of is that he will probably sign a midfielder or two. Maybe bring Fellaini with him..
That's not a consolation. That would be rubbing salt in the wounds.
But I am dreading the 1st "you don't know what you're doing"
Contrary to internet Ihni binni dimi diniwiny anitaime, in general, United fans have more class than that.
He'd be a good option, but that's a debate for another day.
Also regarding his inexperience in Europe, he'll be largely keeping the United coaching staff according to various sources(Independent etc). All of them have enough experience to compensate for Moyes's inexperience.
I haven't said anything of the sort either. I've given my reasons. I think there are better candidates, and Moyes to me seems like a safe, uninspiring, unimaginative appointment.
Anyone following Fergie has a tough job, but this is an opportunity to modernise our thinking and coaching, and perhaps our football. A chance to go in a different direction with possibly a young vibrant forward thinking manager, and instead we've likely gone with a rather dull, pragmatic option who plays rather dull, pragmatic football.
It doesn't make you a muppet to think that one of the biggest clubs in the world shouldn't appoint a mid-table manager.
Well if they have the experience why not let them manage the club?
If Gill is saying the next man needs European experience then we should have went for someone with it. It's simple really. We should be looking at some of the managerial heavyweights. We're trying to replace the best manager ever.
Does anyone think one of the reason for signing Moyes is that his contract runs out this summer so we don't have to pay a penny for him?
Well if they have the experience why not let them manage the club?
If Gill is saying the next man needs European experience then we should have went for someone with it. It's simple really. We should be looking at some of the managerial heavyweights. We're trying to replace the best manager ever.
Really it's ok, we're not the first manager in the world to appoint a manager who hasn't won a trophy.
Barcelona appointed Pep Guardiola.
Juventus appointed Conte who only won Seria B.
Moyes is more established than them when they were going for the big job. Doesn't mean that Moyes is going to be a very big success, but there's no guarantee of success with anyother manager. Even the Caf favorite Mourinho did average with an extremely assembled squad at Real.
Has anyone considered that "European" experience generally means feck all?
A European football match is still a football match, you can learn all you need by studying your opponents and talking to people. If you have good experience, then you have good experience for Europe.
A good manager will tweak the playing style depending on opponent and objective. Not by making drastic changes.
They don't have the experience of managing a club?
Personally, the main reason I'm ok about Moyes appointment is the fact that Ferguson has personally recommended him to the job. I don't think he'd have recommended anyone who could potentially ruin nearly all of his great work.
Essentially they didn't have United/City/Chelsea/Arsenal/Spurs/Liverpool to contend with. If those clubs were all playing in the german league then Klopp may not have found it so easy to produce a team playing this football.
So their experience is only a positive enough to cover Moyes inexperience, but not positive enough for them to do the job themselves? Read what I was replying to.
BREAKING NEWS
David Moyes is set to be appointed as Sir Alex Ferguson's successor at Manchester United.
An announcement could be made tomorrow afternoon.