Perhaps in a few months I can look back on this game and see it as the start of great things, when it looks like his plan of cohesive, controlling, attractive football is finally coming together. But at this point it's a bit like saying
"Well done little Timmy, you may have managed to throw all your food on the floor, spit all over the table and shit yourself, but you've picked up the cup! Hooray! Happy 14th Birthday."
It's such a base managerial requirement to motivate a team in this position, and so largely his fault to begin with, that to give him credit for, essentially, NOT fecking up and slumping out in pathetic fashion isn't really something I feel like jumping at. Though yes, he did manage to not do that. Well done Timmy.
Yes Giggs and Wellbeck played. Both played reasonably well too. But it wasn't some managerial masterstroke of tactical nouse. We didn't control the game, exploit their weaknesses or nullify their threats due to these players playing. We had
less possession, at home against Olympiacos, who also conspired to have more attempts on goal (14 > 12) and more completed passes than us (327 > 309) but we scored a penalty and a free kick. It wasn't exactly Chelsea away at City.
Apparently though, this is "magnificent"