Plenty of chairmen for lower-table teams would wet themselves at the prospect of getting him.If he does get the sack, you really do have to wonder where he'd end up going. Everton wouldn't even have him back now.
This. The idea of a long-term manager really shouldn't be sought after so highly anymore. We need to move on from this idea. I'd rather have a stable infrastructure with a merry go round of managers every 3 or 4 years rather than trying to go long-term with one and inevitably encountering these sort of situations.Theres never going to be another Fergie mate. Just let it go, football has moved on. The sooner we do the better.
Manchester United players under more threat than David Moyes
http://www1.skysports.com/football/...ore-threat-than-david-moyes-says-gary-neville
Neville joined Geoff Sheeves on this week's Champions League Podcast where he reiterated that Moyes will have the backing of the board despite the under-par results this season.
"I said earlier on in the season the players will be in more danger than the manager," said the former United captain. "The way in which Manchester United have always worked is to give the manager time and I believe in that philosophy.
"Managers are getting sacked after 70 days but to even think of sacking a manager after seven months is nonsense, so I think [United] will support Moyes.
"You look at the people on the board, and we're talking about the Glazer family and whether they've ever been put in this position before.
"But you look at the likes of David Gill, Sir Bobby Charlton, Sir Alex Ferguson - who are obviously the main football people at Manchester United - and I don't think for one second it will be crossing their minds at this moment in time.
"The players will be more at threat and feeling nervous about whether they are part of the future."
Time and money
Neville's comments come off the back of another disappointing week for United who were beaten 2-0 by Olympiakos in the first-leg, last-16 fixture, but he insists that his former club will stand by Moyes and offer him money to develop his squad over the summer.
Neville added: "I think Ed Woodwood said as part of his shareholder announcement a couple of weeks ago that the money would be there for Moyes to invest in the summer.
"I truly believe Moyes will get given the opportunity at Manchester United to complete his work.
"I've said myself, two to three years is the time that should be given to a manager for him to try and do a piece of work - there will be people who will disagree with that but that's my opinion and you won't change that.
"Sir Alex Ferguson got given two to three years and now people turn around and say that's 25 years ago, well alright, what's changed? Are we saying managers can't get given time now?
"I don't know what the board are going to do but my view of that club, which is the way they always speak and the way they've always behaved, is that managers get given time - Ron Atkinson gets given time, Dave Sexton gets given time, Sir Alex Ferguson gets given time.
Safest
"A lot of the same people are still there - Sir Bobby Charlton, Martin Edwards is still around the club.
"The people who are there believe in the philosophy around the club and have been at United for many, many years and that's why they've given David Moyes a six-year contract.
"I have to say at another football club, whether it be Chelsea - we saw with Andre Villas-Boas who was sacked - or Tottenham, Moyes would be in a lot more trouble.
"But he's at the club that you'd say he was probably safest, where the club will stand by him - think about Sir Alex Ferguson, he's public on his philosophy around giving people time.
"It probably jars against what most clubs are doing these days but, that's the Manchester United way and always has been and they would have to change that philosophy.
"In terms of an acceptable season it's gone because Manchester United have to win a trophy - that's the barometer of measuring Manchester United's seasons.
"It's not acceptable that Manchester United don't win a trophy, it's not been acceptable for 25 years, it's not going to change this year."
"Sir Alex Ferguson got given two to three years and now people turn around and say that's 25 years ago, well alright, what's changed?
If he does get the sack, you really do have to wonder where he'd end up going. Everton wouldn't even have him back now.
Mr Man Utd pipes in:
This stood out as the most blinkered, ridiculously stupid statement:
If he does get the sack, you really do have to wonder where he'd end up going. Everton wouldn't even have him back now.
This. The idea of a long-term manager really shouldn't be sought after so highly anymore. We need to move on from this idea. I'd rather have a stable infrastructure with a merry go round of managers every 3 or 4 years rather than trying to go long-term with one and inevitably encountering these sort of situations.
It may not be as bad as what we're seeing now but when you have someone that big leave and the succession plan is executed poorly, you're only asking for trouble
Pardew's eventual replacement at Newcastle perhaps, i can see Ashley being drawn the idea of having a former United manager in charge.
The media will circle the wagons around Moyes no matter waht so his reputation won't be too diminished.
I believe it refers to a style of football that is based on attempting to score by lumping it to the striker / players inside the box as many times as possible, with the logic that some are bound to be converted.Didn't know where else to ask this:
Could someone please explain to me what the so often used term "percentage football" refers to?
If I understood correctly, it refers to crossing and hoping for the best?
He's a cnut and he's talking shit. There is no "United philosophy" based on "giving every manager a few years". Wilf McGuinness didn't get a few years. Frank O'Farrell didn't get a few years.Neville is really starting to grind.
He's also beginning to sound desperate.
There is no "United philosophy" based on "giving every manager a few years". Wilf McGuinness didn't get a few years. Frank O'Farrell didn't get a few years.
He's a cnut and he's talking shit. There is no "United philosophy" based on "giving every manager a few years". Wilf McGuinness didn't get a few years. Frank O'Farrell didn't get a few years.
No, he's not. There's not need to talk about a legend of this club for airing his views about the club. He has earned the right to do so, whether you agree or not.
I don't agree with him, but that's my opinion. Just because it worked 27 years ago, doesn't mean it will work in todays fast moving, modern football. The earlier we act, the better I believe.
What does he care more about though - what's absolutely best for Manchester United Football Club, or what's best for his brother, his own flesh and blood?
And by the way, I don't have any less respect for G.Nev as an ex player, but he's so Moyes biased it's almost awkward to watch.
I agree he's now started to sound very bias towards our club. Last year he wasn't, he was actually able to give both sides of the arguments well.
I just think he is passionate about the club and it's 'philosophy' and I feel that he actually believes the words he is saying. I don't think we can judge what his motives are, because it's clearly not to keep his bother in a job, that's first and foremost. I just think he is hurting and his massive love for the club is showing. He was under the regime of sticking by your manager and he's made a fortune off it. He's not stupid, so he most likely is able to see the massive problems we are facing, but his answer is to stick not twist.
I do not agree with him, just for the record.
I've asked you about 5 or 6 times now, is your name inspired by Fine Young Cannibals? Anyways, Your theory on Foreign coaches sound a bit like a conspiracy theory. Arsene Wenger is one of the best loved managers here and he's French. Southampton and Pochetino have a lot of love from the press and he's an Argentine. Maybe he fouled Owen for the penalty and the press are thankful for it, but still it seems a bit crazy. Journo's write contrary opinions and they have a vested interest in selling their newspapers, not the future of David Moyes or English coaches.
Most of these newspapers don't care a bit about England or it's coaches. There could always be soft spots for coaches, 'arry Redknapp for all the talk of media darling, did well with Spurs actually. Maybe he let the team play itself, but still he produced results. At the end of the day, papers and journo's are only there to do one thing, and that's to sell their product.
They don't want Fergie back in charge busting their balls each week.
If they're not favouring and babying Moyes because he's British then I dunno what to say...
Because of his charming and funny interviews?
Because they genuinely believe he's doing a great job and they care about the plight of Man Utd?
They like his...eyes?
Since you've just flat out stated that you don't believe there's a bias due to him being British, what do you think? I'm intrigued.
You still continue to evade the question about the Cannibals. I don't know buddy, I'm not a journalist, but maybe they are being drip fed by the club, or maybe they genuinely think Moyes can turn it around, or maybe they want the club to do badly and thereby retain Moyes, or maybe they just want to watch the world burn.
That's totally fine but however good their intentions, it's still highly questionable. It doesn't matter who you are, you aren't invincible from making a poor decision. Fergie handpicking our next manager imo is one and I felt that way once news came out he was the one who told Moyes he'd be taking over.Whether the fans accept it or don't, I don't think you can particulary complain that the board attempted getting in a manager with the future in mind, hoping he'd be able to lead the club for many years. I does look like it was the wrong decision, but hopefully they'll realise this and change the policy before any further damage is caused.
Because he disagrees with you?He's a cnut and he's talking shit. There is no "United philosophy" based on "giving every manager a few years". Wilf McGuinness didn't get a few years. Frank O'Farrell didn't get a few years.
Mr Man Utd pipes in:
This stood out as the most blinkered, ridiculously stupid statement:
No, he's not. There's not need to talk about a legend of this club for airing his views about the club. He has earned the right to do so, whether you agree or not.
I don't agree with him, but that's my opinion. Just because it worked 27 years ago, doesn't mean it will work in todays fast moving, modern football. The earlier we act, the better I believe.
Because he disagrees with you?
You are pathetic.
Club legend
And it has absolutely nothing to do with his brother being on the coaching team. Honest.There is no changing Neville's mind.
That's totally fine but however good their intentions, it's still highly questionable. It doesn't matter who you are, you aren't invincible from making a poor decision. Fergie handpicking our next manager imo is one and I felt that way once news came out he was the one who told Moyes he'd be taking over.
I'm not sure if they'll change the policy. They gave him a 6 year contract. WHen you have the likes of Neville barking on television that our philosophy is to give managers time (hmph poor wilf), I don't think the club is going to let go of Moyes so soon. Much of what Neville has said also aligns with Fergie's views as well. I still find it ridiculous how players who have proven their worth here are in more danger than Moyes according to GNev but I digress.
I honestly feel Fergie and Charlton's stubbornness could get the best of them in this scenario because by giving Moyes a 6 year contract, that seemed more like a statement of intent that sheer long-term planning. We laughed at Newcastle when they gave Pardew an 8 year contract.
Even though I didnt want Moyes, it would be nice to see him turn it around. Sadly, on current evidence, that doesnt look to be the case.
The idea behind bringing Moyes isn't necessarily a bad one but I'm not sure how thoroughly thought out it was. As if we only looked at the positives and put our hope into that. THere's no guarantee that sticking with him will work out. It could go either way. But for me, it's disappointing that we've allowed ourselves to get into this situation.
Maybe that's just how it should be though? That's how a club of our stature should act, because we can.
Or maybe we should do it the United way and stick with a hard working chap from Govan and his assistant who's a wee footballing chap from a good family, born barely a mile away from where Fergie few up.
And it has absolutely nothing to do with his brother being on the coaching team. Honest.
Agree with this, as a player he will go down as one if the greats, as a pundit though he is getting worse every time I hear him. In fairness to him he is between a rock and a hard place at the moment, he can't criticise any England players for obvious reasons and he feels he has to stick up for his brother.And for those calling him cnuts.... shame on you, that man has done more for us than any of us can ever dream off... Have a little respect ffs
I think Brenton would do well here as he knows exactly how he want his teams to play. The fans would love the football. That move will not happen though.Joking aside Redknapp would absolutely do a better job here than Moyes. For what he may lack tactically he's a real personality that players buzz off and he would relish it and get our players performing for him purely because he'd know what to say to them as his man management is excellent. We would probably play a 4-4-2 but a damn sight better than Moyes has us doing it. Redknapp knows players and knows where best to play them. I imagine Moyes is about as inspiring as a fart in a lift.
Even Mark Hughes I could see doing a better job here because although I don't think he's that much different to Moyes in terms of management he at least knows what it's like here and the demands that come with it.
It's like Gary thinks we're some conservation project, that Manchester United's style of play is an endangered species.Stopped listening to Neville on all things United when he said we "stand against the immediacy of modern life"
Stop it Gary.