Tomalonge
New Member
It can't have been that bad if it got him the job.Absolute shit head
Just sticking this here so I don't have to explain in about 10 seconds that it was just a bit of fun.
It can't have been that bad if it got him the job.Absolute shit head
You're exceptional at twisting everything aren't you?How does it not? Bad "club traditions" should be broken, giving incompetent managers far too long caused our 26yr oblivion, and now you want a repeat of exactly the very tradition that caused it?
Was Sir Alex wrong to break up the drinking culture when he started? That was part of the fabric of the club at the time too.
If it worked out for them, then wasn't it.. right?Yes they were, but it worked out for them.
You're exceptional at twisting everything aren't you?
We're done here, you're unreasonable.
I'm saying they didn't give him enough time, yes. His replacement wasn't any better.If it worked out for them, then wasn't it.. right?
You're saying they should have stuck with Hodgson despite him not being the right manager for them?
I'm saying who came after Hodgson is irrelevant. Noone cares about his replacement. Using his replacement's lack of success to make him sound better is pointless. If they had replaced him when they did with Rodgers your opinion would change?I'm saying they didn't give him enough time, yes. His replacement wasn't any better.
Unless you're going to now tell me Rodgers came straight after Hodgson? They could have avoided that whole Dalgleish saga too if they'd had an ounce of patience.
Wilf McGuinness and Frank O'Farrell were screwed over as much by the fact that the Busby handover was so badly orchestrated as anything to do with themselves. An aging team of superstars who they couldn't control with the spectre of the old boss still hanging over them.You could easily say that those years with those managers you cited should have taught us that sticking with the wrong man in charge is a bad idea. "We kept shit managers for a long time in the past and barely won anything for over two decades" shouldn't really be a pro-Moyes argument.
No. Even if it worked out with them. A manager needs 18 months before you even think about getting rid. It didn't look good with Hodgson but who knows what would have happened the season after. Not every manager hits the ground running.I'm saying who came after Hodgson is irrelevant. Noone cares about his replacement. Using his replacement's lack of success to make him sound better is pointless. If they had replaced him when they did with Rodgers your opinion would change?
And not every manager is good enough. Time doesn't give people the requisite abilities I'm afraid.No. Even if it worked out with them. A manager needs 18 months before you even think about getting rid. It didn't look good with Hodgson but who knows what would have happened the season after. Not every manager hits the ground running.
Well put, I can agree to disagree with that.Anyway agree to disagree. Giving Hodgson 18 months despite it being so obvious that he was at best a decent manager is plain wrong IMO.
Who said anything about WINNING? Are we complaining that Moyes has us behind City/Chelsea and not quite in the title race?Wilf McGuinness and Frank O'Farrell were screwed over as much by the fact that the Busby handover was so badly orchestrated as anything to do with themselves. An aging team of superstars who they couldn't control with the spectre of the old boss still hanging over them.
The Doc would probably have won us the league eventually had he been able to keep his dick in his pants.
Dave Sexton probably did get too long as the mediocrity under him was stifling but he'd done a good job in the past with Chelsea so you can see why they waited.
Big Ron was entertaining and put together a great team but ultimately was too chummy with them which lead to the drinking culture that always seemed to peg us back as key players fell injured or went off the boil.
What United put up with for those two decades is what almost every other team's fans have to put up with in perpetuity, most would be more than happy with the 3 FA Cups and Charity Shield we won in that period which is why those of us that were around then think the new, entitled set if United fans are acting like spoilt brats.
CAL: Yes, I have ABU fans and they take the piss, but only to the same extent I do of their team's fates year in year out. It's banter and it's part of the reason I love football, I've actually found the last few years dull as hell since we've been playing shit that I'm too embarrassed to crow about and still winning things which has only further encouraged our entitled generation of fans to think winning is a right.
I'm saying they didn't give him enough time, yes. His replacement wasn't any better.
Unless you're going to now tell me Rodgers came straight after Hodgson? They could have avoided that whole Dalgleish saga too if they'd had an ounce of patience.
What United put up with for those two decades is what almost every other team's fans have to put up with in perpetuity, most would be more than happy with the 3 FA Cups and Charity Shield we won in that period which is why those of us that were around then think the new, entitled set if United fans are acting like spoilt brats.
CAL: Yes, I have ABU fans and they take the piss, but only to the same extent I do of their team's fates year in year out. It's banter and it's part of the reason I love football, I've actually found the last few years dull as hell since we've been playing shit that I'm too embarrassed to crow about and still winning things which has only further encouraged our entitled generation of fans to think winning is a right.
This sums it up nicely.And not every manager is good enough. Time doesn't give people the requisite abilities I'm afraid.
Anyway agree to disagree. Giving Hodgson 18 months despite it being so obvious that he was at best a decent manager is plain wrong IMO.
If the decision is wrong, it should IMO be corrected ASAP.
People expecting to see progress game by game are kidding themselves. That's not how it works. I'm sure all his work behind the scenes is being geared towards next season and the long term. Even under SAF, things got worse before they got any better.
One of the most disappointing things is how there's no clear or subtle sign of a change of approach. We play the same pretty much each week. You'd have thought given the results that there would have been some evident signs of tactical re-evaluation. Instead it does genuinely seem as if the manager blames our form on not having the right players or refereeing decisions or simply being unlucky.
We're well into February of our worst season in many years and there's almost been no sign that the manager has even entertained the idea that maybe it's his tactical approach that's an issue. You wonder how long it'll take him to adapt to reality that while the playing squad may need some additions and referees can be shite - that he also plays a part in turning us around. Instead it's virtually the same-old, same-old each week, as if he genuinely thinks "Well I'm not doing anything wrong - it must be these other factors."
I remember the Wilf McGuiness era - 18 months. He got us to the SF of the Cup and the League Cup in his first season and he took us to 8th place. We were 11th the season before, under Sir Matt, and we scored fewer goals. Going by most objective criteria he earned another go, despite the lack of beautiful football on the field. He was sacked the following Christmas.
I also remember that one of the players who gave him a hard time in that period was Bobby Charlton. History is nothing without context.
All the others parted on contractual terms or stood down.
So why are we now likely to sack a guy after only 7 months and 36 games?
True, it was the likes of Bobby and Denis who were his mates from the time they'd played together who basically screwed him over by going behind his back to talk to Matt. IIRC they never actually sacked him though, he stepped aside and let Busby take the reins again with him going back to his previous coaching duties. I was only a nipper at the time though so I'm only going on what's been written in the various club histories I've read.
PEven under SAF, things got worse before they got any better.
"We will never die" is woven into the fabric of this great club yet a guy who looks, talks and acts like an extra from The Walking Dead is supposed to be your Chosen One? Please, for the love of Eric find yourself a new club.
People expecting to see progress game by game are kidding themselves. That's not how it works. I'm sure all his work behind the scenes is being geared towards next season and the long term. Even under SAF, things got worse before they got any better.
Question....in the last 2 years. ..have we played brilliant attacking football? Or did we have loads of fans complain about static zombie passing , etc.
It seemed to me that we played the worst football out of the top 4 (and the likes of swansea and southampton) yet we were grabbing wins (thanks to rvp) and ended up winning the title.
You can blame moyes for a lot of things, even the playing style...but dont pretend he changed us from playing amazing football under SAF. We have been playjng this same style for a couple of years now.
You can blame moyes for a lot of things, even the playing style...but dont pretend he changed us from playing amazing football under SAF. We have been playjng this same style for a couple of years now.
Our football has not been great for a while, granted. But he's made it worse, totally one dimensional. Funnily enough, I saw the positives in Fergie's retirement because I felt we could use a new approach. But we didn't even get that.
errm when? the amount of myths going about around this period are unreal. fergie took over a team of alcoholics, who were 21st in the league - withing 18 months they were second and two seasons later went on a run of trophies that saw the fa cup, CWC, ESC, League Cup, League, League, Fa Cup all won in 5 years.
there was one lull in 89, which is completely over exaggerated. since 95, we have had i think 4 seasons without trophies...nothing has ever got worse under fergie apart from the rebuilding needed in 2005, but we still at least remained competitive and things were showing good sings (Rio, Ronaldo, Rooney and Schmeichel finally replaced)
having limited players like Phil Jones in it, plus no CM and hopeless wingers has been the main reason.
Wish they had done. Pool would be languishing where we are right now if they stuck with Woy.And not every manager is good enough. Time doesn't give people the requisite abilities I'm afraid.
Anyway agree to disagree. Giving Hodgson 18 months despite it being so obvious that he was at best a decent manager is plain wrong IMO.
If the decision is wrong, it should IMO be corrected ASAP.
@Cal?
Who's saying "Keep Moyes" due to sentimentality? We're a laughing stock? How will holding on to him cause more harm than good, and is that a fact or a prediction?
Ridiculous shite being spouted in here.
errm when? the amount of myths going about around this period are unreal. fergie took over a team of alcoholics, who were 21st in the league - withing 18 months they were second and two seasons later went on a run of trophies that saw the fa cup, CWC, ESC, League Cup, League, League, Fa Cup all won in 5 years.
there was one lull in 89, which is completely over exaggerated. since 95, we have had i think 4 seasons without trophies...nothing has ever got worse under fergie apart from the rebuilding needed in 2005, but we still at least remained competitive and things were showing good sings (Rio, Ronaldo, Rooney and Schmeichel finally replaced)
Question....in the last 2 years. ..have we played brilliant attacking football? Or did we have loads of fans complain about static zombie passing , etc.
It seemed to me that we played the worst football out of the top 4 (and the likes of swansea and southampton) yet we were grabbing wins (thanks to rvp) and ended up winning the title.
You can blame moyes for a lot of things, even the playing style...but dont pretend he changed us from playing amazing football under SAF. We have been playjng this same style for a couple of years now.
Get over it. It happens.I've heard plenty laughing at us on the Radio, Shaun fcuking Goater was laughing at us yesterday, that stalwart of the lower league Shitty years.
Shaun Goater...
Why do people keep comparing Fergie and Moyes? Fergie had to build a club when he came here. from financials, infrastructure to youth team system. All Moyes is left to do is build a successful team. Thats literally it, everything else is in place already for him.