Moises Caicedo | Chelsea agree £115M fee | signed for Chelsea

Status
Not open for further replies.
Offensively, rice definitely has more to his game. Plus rice has leadership quality, stronger build, aerial prowess and can read the game extremely well. However, if I want a defensive midfielder, I would favor Caceido. Rice has nore in his locker than Caicedo. With Caicedo, you already know what you will get, which is a midfield destroyer.
Do you support Chelsea these days?
 
Well their logic is quite simple Caicedo for them is the better player and they are also pretty much convinced that he is better suited to United needs who gives a damn what Manager thinks or wants .

They just Know better and to add final insult to the injury Somehow United are also Financing their Caicedo pursuit by Buying Mount which absolutely makes no sense but who cares about the facts right .
There will soon be vacancies at the club. They should apply.
 
Well their logic is quite simple Caicedo for them is the better player and they are also pretty much convinced that he is better suited to United needs who gives a damn what Manager thinks or wants .

They just Know better and to add final insult to the injury Somehow United are also Financing their Caicedo pursuit by Buying Mount which absolutely makes no sense but who cares about the facts right .
There’s a real irony to this - and subsequent - post(s) that shouldn’t go without saying.
 
With Casemiro and Caicedo as defensive midfielders behind them I think it would be absolutely fine to play either of them in that position.

I'm sure you don't. I don't imagine anyone with a good level of competence would see it the same though.
 
I'm sure you don't. I don't imagine anyone with a good level of competence would see it the same though.
You said I'm in cuckoo land for suggesting to play Mainoo as an 8, when that's his natural position. Good one.

As for Amad, Tony Mowbray had this to say about him:

I’ve been trying to say to you the ball isn’t a problem to him, he can play wide, he can play inside, he can play deep. I think he can play centre-midfield for us in the Championship, you know. Just give him the ball and he very rarely loses it. Yet we generally put Roberts really wide and play Amad just inside him.

“We’ve had huge success down the right-hand side of the pitch with those two linking and playing with each other, people running off the back of the two of them and sliding people in. It’s very profitable for us. He is versatile. I see United games, I watch a lot of football, and Bruno [Fernandes] plays a bit of everywhere, off the right sometimes, inside as a 10 or as a running 8, he can play deep and link the midfield up. Amad is a similar type of footballer.

I'd like to think Mowbray has a good level of competence. As I originally said, with two of the best defensive midfielders behind either of them, I think it would've worked well.
 
Last edited:
This thread is wild, but of all the wild takes here, the prize goes to @OverratedOpinion saying Bissouma went to a Conte side that was "looking to dominate the ball" :lol: .
 
You said I'm in cuckoo land for suggesting to play Mainoo as an 8, when that's his natural position. Good one.

As for Amad, Tony Mowbray had this to say about him:



I'd like to think Mowbray has a good level of competence. As I originally said, with two of the best defensive midfielders behind either of them, I think it would've worked well.

I didn't say that at all, that was your assumption because rather than ask, it's easier for you to fill in the blanks yourself. Good one.

I said you were in cuckoo land for suggesting that we play a kid as an 8 when we have ambitions of competing for the league and for suggesting another very young, attacking and not so well built lad who is off the back of a single good championship season also play there.

You're absolutely welcome to think it but I'm equally within my right to think it's a terrible idea and we won't see it happen, for good reason.

I'm sure Mainoo will get some minutes, if not on loan, but to factor him in at this point is pretty pointless. I'll happily eat my words if, by the end of the season, he's hit 20+ appearances in games of any sort of significance. As for Amad, I don't expect Ten Hag to be using him as any sort of answer in the 8. I'm sure he's able to do some sort of a job in that sort of role in certain circumstances, teams and leagues but for Manchester United in the Premier League? Absolutely not a chance.

As I said, I think it's a crazy suggestion but feel free to tag me and gloat if Ten Hag goes with it and has any degree of success. I won't be holding my breath though.

Garnacho is a level above most talents at his age. Look at how sparingly he was used and that's in a position we had some issues in as well as historically being far more forgiving for young players to get some time in. Mainoo will need a similar season at least before he is worth considering as any sort of consistent stand in as 'the 8'. Most people calling for youth players to play have seen less than an hour of YouTube clips in total. Maybe you go and watch him at the sports village every time he plays but I'm going to guess your opinion is based more on hype and optimism than an analytical, objective view following extensive time watching him and understanding what he would bring to Ten Hag's system.
 
Would you not say Locatelli is more in the Iniesta type category than Caicedo/Rice


Locatelli can play both nr.6 and yes the Iniesta role. But clearly Locatelli is not the specific Iniesta type of nr.8 role, the LCM role.

Locatelli is been using as a nr.6 at Juventus because Rabiot is more a natural LCM and box to box player.

There some types of LCM role. One right foot like Iniesta. Lighter version like Gundogan and the a left foot LCM like David Silva or Phil Foden.

And when you mentioned Iniesta. It's about the skill on the ball, which Locatelli is clearly better than Rice and Caicedo. Rice and Caicedo is two all round nr.6. While Locatelli has the ball skill, really high. But not on Iniesta ball skill level.

Iniesta is a world class right foot LCM. And since Locatelli doesn't has that top level ball skill like Iniesta. Iniesta is a GOAT as LCM player and it will take decades before a new LCM that will reach Iniesta ball skill level. It is Iniesta close control and in small area. Iniesta is so quick, both in his heads and feets. Iniesta will always get away from opponent players.

So i believe Locatelli will do a good job as LCM too. But United and Ten Hag just bought Mason Mount. And i predict Mount will be most use as a LCM at United. Maybe can see Mount as nr.10 and Bruno on right. If Antony is out of injured or doesn't hit the top level as a RW.


But example of a line up with Mount and Locatelli in 433/451 formation:

Bruno/Eriksen/McTom - Casemiro/Kobbie Mainoo/Locatelli - Mount/Locatelli/Fred


In a 4231 formation:


Antony/Bruno/Sancho - Eriksen/Locatelli - Casemiro/McTom/Fred - Rashford/Garnacho +

CAM/nr.10 : Bruno/Mount

CF options : Martial/Rashford and the new Richarlison look a like boy from Colombia who just sign new contract with United


In short and sum up : Manuel Locatelli has both of Casemiro and Eriksen in him, but he doesn't has the top level/world class level of ball skill like Iniesta. He can do Casemiro role as ball winner and has the Eriksen creative. Combine Casemiro and Eriksen in one then you get Locatelli.
Locatelli is more than a deep laying aggresive ball winner. Mobile and with young legs. Locatelli's ball skills is really high.
Watch Locatelli video clips on youtube closely. Locatelli's ball skills will not show on the stats. You get to watch closely. To see how good he is on the ball.

Locatelli is aggresive and dirty, but still really elegance and really good on the ball.
 
I didn't say that at all, that was your assumption because rather than ask, it's easier for you to fill in the blanks yourself. Good one.

I said you were in cuckoo land for suggesting that we play a kid as an 8 when we have ambitions of competing for the league and for suggesting another very young, attacking and not so well built lad who is off the back of a single good championship season also play there.

You're absolutely welcome to think it but I'm equally within my right to think it's a terrible idea and we won't see it happen, for good reason.

I'm sure Mainoo will get some minutes, if not on loan, but to factor him in at this point is pretty pointless. I'll happily eat my words if, by the end of the season, he's hit 20+ appearances in games of any sort of significance. As for Amad, I don't expect Ten Hag to be using him as any sort of answer in the 8. I'm sure he's able to do some sort of a job in that sort of role in certain circumstances, teams and leagues but for Manchester United in the Premier League? Absolutely not a chance.

As I said, I think it's a crazy suggestion but feel free to tag me and gloat if Ten Hag goes with it and has any degree of success. I won't be holding my breath though.

Garnacho is a level above most talents at his age. Look at how sparingly he was used and that's in a position we had some issues in as well as historically being far more forgiving for young players to get some time in. Mainoo will need a similar season at least before he is worth considering as any sort of consistent stand in as 'the 8'. Most people calling for youth players to play have seen less than an hour of YouTube clips in total. Maybe you go and watch him at the sports village every time he plays but I'm going to guess your opinion is based more on hype and optimism than an analytical, objective view following extensive time watching him and understanding what he would bring to Ten Hag's system.
With the theoretical context that Casemiro and Caicedo would be the support behind him, Amad has all the qualities to play as the 8/10 for us, in the Premier League. He’s one of the best players we have in possession, like Mowbray said he very rarely loses possession, and is a very gifted passer which is what this side needs. With Amad and Eriksen ahead of him in selection, Mainoo could be also used as the 8, with the guaranteed defensive solidarity behind, to help him develop like what’s happened with Garnacho this season.
 
I take it this means they have given up on Colwill, which means talks should go smoother now that they’re not still trying to include him in the Caicedo negotiations.

 
I take it this means they have given up on Colwill, which means talks should go smoother now that they’re not still trying to include him in the Caicedo negotiations.



Or Chelsea have pissed them off too much and Brighton will offer a cut price deal with United to spite you…?

:wenger:
 
I take it this means they have given up on Colwill, which means talks should go smoother now that they’re not still trying to include him in the Caicedo negotiations.



Bassey?! Wasn't he terrible at Ajax last season? I know the whole team struggled, but sounds like he was really exposed.
 
Or Chelsea have pissed them off too much and Brighton will offer a cut price deal with United to spite you…?

:wenger:

Nah they love us, we gave them 62M for Cucurella and they immediately improved on the position for 1/4 of the price. We also gave 20M for Potter and his staff and they immediately improved in that area too. Now we're offering 80M for a guy they signed for less than 1M. We're their cash cow.
 
Bassey?! Wasn't he terrible at Ajax last season? I know the whole team struggled, but sounds like he was really exposed.

No idea, haven't followed him at Ajax but he was very highly rated at Rangers.
 
Annoying that Chelsea are getting a player everyone seems to rate so highly. We need players other than one ageing Casmeiro in the buildup phase.
 
He’d be an excellent partner for Casemiro in competitive games, plus short term cover long term replacement.

but we have two big holes in the squad to prioritise before that

we surely can't buy a keeper, striker, Mount and Caicedo
 
but we have two big holes in the squad to prioritise before that

we surely can't buy a keeper, striker, Mount and Caicedo
Yep true, as good a summer that'd be. A deep midfielder should be priority but with £55-60 million spent on Mount it'll have to be a tight budget purchase instead.
 
Yep true, as good a summer that'd be. A deep midfielder should be priority but with £55-60 million spent on Mount it'll have to be a tight budget player for now.

I see deep midfielder being on the priority list in January IF we actually get ownership sorted
 
Yep true, as good a summer that'd be. A deep midfielder should be priority but with £55-60 million spent on Mount it'll have to be a tight budget player for now.

if ETH wants to play two defensive midfielders, yeah. But it seems he doesn't, hence going for Mount first.
 
but we have two big holes in the squad to prioritise before that

we surely can't buy a keeper, striker, Mount and Caicedo

And even if you could, it's very debateable whether you should.

There are three midfield slots in our team and they will currently be filled by three players who expect to start week in week out, under a manager notorious for not rotating much. And behind them you have Eriksen, who started pretty much every game when fit this season and isn't going to suddenly stop playing altogether.

I would question the value of adding another massive money midfield signing who'll expect to start most games on top of that. Versus signing a different profile midfielder with more realistic gametime expectations and diverting resources somewhere more useful than having a strong bench. It's not like we don't have other positions we might like to strengthen in the starting eleven beyond those four, as we not only play one of Dalot and AWB every single game but also likely rely on them to invert and support midfield. I'd happily take a cheap backup to Casemiro and new RB over spending big on Caicedo.
 
Last edited:
He's not good partner for Casemiro. They would have the same role.
They're both all rounded enough to play as an 8, it would be a very gifted double pivot. They would be able to take turns as the 6 and 8 with ease.
 
And even if you could, it's very debateable whether you should.

There are three midfield slots in our team and they will currently be filled by three players who expect to start week in week out, under a manager notorious for not rotating much. And behind them you have Eriksen, who started pretty much every game when fit this season and isn't going to suddenly stop playing altogether.

I would question the value of adding another massive money midfield signing who'll expect to start most games on top of that. Versus signing a different profile midfielder with more realistic gametime expectations and diverting resources somewhere more useful than having a strong bench. It's not like we don't have other positions we might like to strengthen in the starting eleven beyond those four, as we not only play one of Dalot and AWB every single game but also likely rely on them to invert and support midfield.

I'd haplily take a cheap backup to Casemiro and new RB over Caicedo.
Caicedo could've covered both, as a RB advancing into defensive midfield like he did for Brighton and against us with success last season.

Possible combinations -

Rashford
Garnacho Bruno Amad/Eriksen Antony
Casemiro Caicedo
Shaw Varane Martinez

Garnacho Rashford Antony/Amad
Bruno Eriksen/Mainoo
Caicedo
Shaw Varane Martinez Dalot/AWB

Garnacho Rashford Antony/Amad
Bruno
Casemiro Caicedo
Shaw Varane Martinez Dalot/AWB
I understand this is pointless, hypothetical talk now we can't afford him and have Mount instead, but even if we signed him he wouldn't just strengthen our bench he'd strengthen our starting XI including Casemiro and Mount.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.