That's subjective. I would say it's definitely true, and that your statement would apply to you more than to him.
Messi v Ronaldo | Contains double your daily salt allowance
- Thread starter Rado_N
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) and Imran (@Annihilate Now!) are here to discuss Amad saving our blushes in a win against Southampton as well as our now annual loss at home to Brighton. They discuss Amorim's post-match comments, revisit how mid-table we may or may not be, and discuss some transfer news.
- Status
That's subjective. I would say it's definitely true, and that your statement would apply to you more than to him.
Not a record, same as Pele
Good luck getting over him when Messi has scored 1 goal in 10 games
in the 5th best league of the world.Let's see how he does in China
I would say your statement is similarly subjective. And I would also say that you don't understand what quantitative means if you think my statement applies to me before him, given that he has hundreds more posts in this thread than I do.
Not a record, same as Pele
Good luck getting over him when Messi has scored 1 goal in 10 games
Why would I care?
The Balón D'or race is done, and that's why Ronaldo is throwing his toys out if the pram on social media.
Last edited:
Anyone with basic inference skills would have deduced that I was talking about the qualitative aspects of posts. I suppose that says a lot about you. But either way, you're digressing. You feel his posts are poor. I feel that his are of a higher quality than yours and those of the poster who asked for him to be thread banned.
I wonder if this has anything to do with the fact that you share the same opinion...
Not really. But given that this is your first instinct, I wonder whether your statement is because he challenges your viewpoint.
Not really. But do you also think that Messi has started the season better than Ronaldo then?
What a random and worthless "contribution". What does that have to do with anything? Ironic after you called out someone for the quality of their posts.
Thanks for this
Um, the relevance is that you were praising the quality of that poster's posts and claiming they were more worthwhile than mine. That poster has been arguing Messi has started the season better than Ronaldo. Which I took to mean you feel the same. It's really not a tough thought process to follow. So do you think Messi has started the season better?
There you are. That's what you took, and judging by the poor inference skills you've already demonstrated, it should be a sign that you ought to be sure about what you're talking about.
The poster in question has a plethora of posts regarding the Messi be Ronaldo debate. I was obviously referring to his posting in general. What would I care about something as trivial as who started the season better?
I put that fella on ignore a long time ago, wouldn’t surprise me at all if he also thinks Messi’s started the season better.
No problem. I don't feel that calling people names and asking for bans when you struggle to form a repost says a lot about a poster.
I think you're mistaking your inability to communicate effectively for poor inference skills on my part. The last few pages of the thread have centred on who began the season better so I'd have thought you may have an opinion on that front but I see your opinion is based on his opinion lining up with your own. The two of you are peas in a pod, actually. Posting on almost nothing but Messi on a United forum.
Dodging the question as opposed to doubling down. I think I'll follow your lead and use the ignore function here too.
You don't seem to have a grasp of the definition of the same of the words you're using. I never "communicated" which points I agree with Nasir about. I was referring to posting in general. So I corrected you and pointed out that you really ought to know what you're saying before doing so.
You're free to post about whatever topic you want. I certainly post about many topics in this forum, as does Nasir. If you don't like the fact that someone has a low opinion of your posts, that's your problem.
Crying about it and resorting to ad-hominems is childish. As is calling for thread bans to people you aren't capable of responding to with anything of substance.
"Luis Suarez claims Lionel Messi "suffers a lot" with the cold weather in France after having private chats with the Paris Saint-Germain superstar about how he is settling into his new surroundings."
Goat who can only do it for a farm in the carribean
Goat who can only do it for a farm in the carribean
"Luis Suarez claims Lionel Messi "suffers a lot" with the cold weather in France after having private chats with the Paris Saint-Germain superstar about how he is settling into his new surroundings."
Goat who can only do it for a farm in the carribean
But remains the Balón D'or king! 7
I have no idea what the bolded means. In terms of questioning your communication skills, I did that as you clearly stated that my post (qualitative Vs quantitative) applied to my post history moreso than the other posters. I wondered how that could be, given that the other poster had considerably more posts in this thread. You then said that I should have inferred that you were talking about the qualitative aspect as opposed to the quantitative. Despite not stating that originally. Hence why I say your communication skills are lacking.
Anyway, this is pointless bickering - one thing we can probably both agree on is that this conversation is excruciatingly pedantic and boring. I'll step out at this point - feel free to have the last word.
We know that someone will never reach 7
Someone already has
Messi is going to have have step up vs Lens and Bordeuex to be the best of the best in terms of a pure Balon D'or king
Stats and numbers are not his game anyway so it shouldn't matter
Exactly. This is the greatest thread in the internet for a reason.
Someone already has
Messi is going to have have step up vs Lens and Bordeuex to be the best of the best in terms of a pure Balon D'or king
Stats and numbers are not his game anyway so it shouldn't matter
Sorry pal. Alternative facts aren't going to change reality
7 will always be greater than 5
Sorry pal. Alternative facts aren't going to change reality
7 will always be greater than 5
And 7 will be always be the same as seven
maybe he should try score some goals against Lens or Borduex or some Chinese club teams to try be the greatest goalscorer or the great of something atleast Really hope this is not true.Unfortunately it is.
Messi's Ballon D'Ors should have an asterisk next to them, much like Liverpool's premier league titles.
moronic take, show the journalists from Brazil and how they voted
I haven't checked, but I'm willing to bet they didn't vote based on FIFA attributes.
hmm.
7 awards voted by journalists who know nothing about football, but 0 relevant actual records over Cristiano : (7 will always be greater than 5
Has anyone ever tallied up the votes by merely relevant journalists and countries? It's quite funny seeing the lists and Messi/Ronaldo still getting mega votes from the most obscure countries in Asia and Africa actually
I don't just mean for this year either, I'd love to a breakdown generator where you can remove all sorts of shit.
I don't just mean for this year either, I'd love to a breakdown generator where you can remove all sorts of shit.
check all your facts before posting
there were a few countries that didn’t have Messi or Lewa in top 5. It goes both ways
I think you're really agitated by the fact that Messi has been exposed this year in the farmer's league. Perhaps you should take some time off the internet to relax.
You’re the one crying about asterisks for Messi. I’m good mate, but keep whining about Messi winning his seventh while you grasp at straws
Has anyone ever tallied up the votes by merely relevant journalists and countries? It's quite funny seeing the lists and Messi/Ronaldo still getting mega votes from the most obscure countries in Asia and Africa actually
I don't just mean for this year either, I'd love to a breakdown generator where you can remove all sorts of shit.
I can't find any record of it online, but I have a distinct memory of reading in World Soccer magazine that some journalist or manager had voted for Marco van Basten one year in the mid-90s when he hadn't played a match for about 2 years
.You would think people would not be triggered by obvious banter, but here we are.
As I said, some people really don't get football.
As I said, some people really don't get football.
- Status