It is quite clear the Messi brigade has gone into panic mode as of last night.
They're confused how this "poacher" keeps dragging team after team to the final.
No panic mode, I admire what Ronaldo did. He showed up brilliantly for Juventus, huge huge game from Ronaldo. He showed Juve they were right to sign him. He carried so much weight and delivered, it's actually awesome to see. I have no problem praising Ronaldo when he does something like this.
I usually don't involve in these discussions and for a record for me Messi is the GOAT (best attacker, best passer, best dribbler too) but weren't you Messi fan boys used Ronaldo not playing in Euro finals as something against him and now you are arguing Messi playing in Round of 16 is enough to credit him with CL title, how does this work?
I know Ronaldo vs Messi argument is full of goal posts shifting but few points doesn't make sense considering the earlier posts.
The problem for me were the over-reactions and the whole PR bullsh*t in that final. I remember someone even said that Ronaldo was key in winning that game because he was spurring the team on from the sidelines and that Eder channeled Ronaldo to score that goal. You know, insane stuff. If anything, Ronaldo disrespected his coach by jumping along the sidelines. His team didn't need any tactical direction from Ronaldo, they had enough from their coach and for me it was a PR stunt. He was injured but wanted to be in the spotlight. His team won the final against France without him, he didn't contribute by cheering from the bench, it's as simple as that. It doesn't take anything away from him, though, it's not his fault he was injured. He was a key player for his team, helped them to the final so fair play to him and congrats on the title.
But to use that as an argument why he is superior to Messi is not right, that's the point some of us are trying to make. Not that the trophy should be omitted from Ronaldo's cabinet, but that he didn't do more in that tournament than Messi had done in World Cup 2014, yet Messi is viewed as a failure on NT level for losing a final while Ronaldo is viewed as a legend for his team winning a final he had no part in. One Eder goal less and Ronaldo is a lesser player? No. One Higuain goal more and Messi is bigger than Maradona? No.
Generally I don't like to see players hogging the spotlight, and this is something Ronaldo does a lot. He even gets praised for it. Think back to the Juventus tie last season. While Madrid were conceding goals at home, the camera would show Ronaldo yell something and clap his hands as if to motivate his team. It didn't help, apparently, because they were still conceding goals, but that didn't stop people from praising Ronaldo's leadership skills. They advanced due to a refereeing mistake, but Ronaldo clapping his hands after every goal somehow meant he was a leader in that game. On the other hand, Barcelona gets eliminated by Roma without Messi putting on a PR performance and he is criticized for not being a leader. Probably because the camera didn't catch him yell anything.
So for me personally, I don't knock Ronaldo for missing that final, he won an international trophy and good on him. It's the other stuff that blows it out of proportion.
only barca fans will argue that Argentina is a weaker team than Portugal's.
It's funny to me that people can so easily discard some key things in football. I mean, we talk about them every day, and yet when it's Messi vs Ronaldo, suddenly many people act like they know next to nothing about this sport.
It's been said many a time that Messi has had a better environment than Ronaldo for most of his career and therefore should have won more. In my opinion, this is not true for the simple fact that people conveniently dismiss one tiny detail, and that's the coach. You know, the person who actually runs the team. What good are world class players on your roster if they won't be coached well, if the team will lack chemistry and direction? Messi played in a star-studded team in 2006/07 and 2007/08 and won nothing because Rijkaard failed to coach the team properly after the CL win. We had Ronaldinho, Eto'o', Deco, Thuram, Zambrotta among others and won nothing. Football is not as simple as just looking at names on paper, it's how they're set up, how the team is managed.
Ronaldo had these managers: SAF, Pellegrini, Mourinho, Ancelotti, Benitez, Zidane, Allegri.
Messi had Rijkaard, Guardiola, Tito Vilanova (the late Tito was ill, it was mostly Jordi Roura for a season), Tata Martino, Luis Enrique, Ernesto Valverde.
They both play(ed) with some amazing players. I think Messi had the better team mates overall for the better part of his career, but we know it's not just about the names on the roster. Even if Messi's team mates were a bit better than Ronaldo's, it's a bit different when it comes to managers. And managers can make a world of difference. It's the same thing with Argentina vs Portugal. Portugal don't have such big names on their roster, but they are better as a team, they function better as a unit and this makes it easier for them to play knockout competitions. Hence teams like Atletico being able to eliminate teams like Barcelona and City. Hence Portugal being able to win an international tournament against France.
I didn't think something like this could be completely ignored by so many people. Argentina are a mess, how do you even call them a team anymore?
When Messi is not on the ball he is by far away the laziest player on the pitch. Even the staunchest Barca fans always highlight the fact that he rarely runs off the ball and basically walks around all game (which they can accept most times because he’s Messi). I once read a stat from 2014 where he covered less ground than the opposing GK in a game they lost. So it’s not really an issue of him “overcoming physical problems.”
The staunchest Barcelona fans know Messi should be doing this to preserve energy. He had a few injuries in 2005-2008 and then Pep took over and told him to rest during games. The idea was that Messi would play (to enable him to influence the game, which he can't do if he's not on the pitch), but that he'd rest during the match by walking around and waiting for his chance to strike. Messi is an extremely intelligent player who doesn't need to run a lot to change the game. We don't have him on the pitch to mark players and put in defensive shifts, he's there to win games for us and he does that. Anyone who pays attention to how Messi plays and why will tell you this.
So no, I don't tolerate it because he's Messi, I tolerate it because he does so much for Barcelona going forward that I'd rather he didn't exert himself defending and risk getting injured. It's a matter of priorities and tactics. It's the job of others to run more, cover space and make sliding tackles, because if Messi did that he wouldn't be as effective building attacks because it would be physically impossible to do as much when you're defending. Can't ask Messi to defend, create and score all at once. He does two out of three and that's already more than any other player does.