Ronaldo the past five years has literally been all time. It was a laugh when he was being compared to Messi only five years ago. Absolutely mind boggling what Ronaldo has achieved the last five years
Woah, didn’t know you have to score (dare I say - more!) to win.
Thanks captain obvious. Don’t know where we’d be without you
Scoring MORE. Not just scoring. Not only can't you write coherent sentences, now you're struggling to read them Go to bed!
Ronaldo the past five years has literally been all time. It was a laugh when he was being compared to Messi only five years ago. Absolutely mind boggling what Ronaldo has achieved the last five years
It’s hilarious watching them twist and turn and tie themselves into a knot trying to argue this.@Cal? don’t know if you noticed or not but he disagreed with you and then instantly agreed with what you said in the following sentence.
From “no it’s not” to then “the point is scoring more” right after, thus agreeing with you haha
No, it's not. Winning is the purpose so the point is scoring more than your opponents. And Messi is much better at dominating the other team, keeping possession, solving tight situations, creating superiority etc. It's quite funny that people like you always proclaim how important Xavi and Iniesta were for Messi's success bit when he runs the midfield for Barca and Argentina in their absence you say football was about scoring goals. I also think that in the majority of cases the player scoring the goal isn't the one who contributed the most for it. But I told you tht numerous times so what's the point? You'll probably answer with a provocative one liner again and I'll point out that you are superficial, use double standards and use these arguments because you idolize Cristiano, not the other way round. You are not as bad as this Vancouver guy I had to put on ignore but in stark contrast to Peyroteo, one simply can't discuss with you. At least in this topic, I've never seen you in a thread in which you can't praise Cristiano or discredit Messi.
First of all, Barca (certainly Xaviesta) are better "at dominating the other team, keeping possession, solving tight situations, creating superiority etc." Messi contributes to that but as we have seen with Argentina, he is incapable of doing that on his own.
Secondly, football is ultimately about scoring more than the opposition, dominating possession etc doesn't really matter one iota without the scoring part. (Unless you're LVG).
I'm the one who's often argued that Messi is the 2nd best footballer ever, yet somehow I'm incapable of giving him credit, whereas the Messi brigade who claim Luiz Ronaldo, Ronaldinho, Modric, Bale & co are better or as good as Cristiano are being completely reasonable?
He certainly seems capable of doing it in La Liga since the demise of Xaviesta, but seem incapable of it in bigger games in the CL or for Argentina.Yes, Xavi and Iniesta are better than him in this regard and no, he is definitely capable of doing it on his own for Argentina and also for Barcelona. He is the one who drops deep and makes the midfield plays by carrying the ball and it has been like this for years in the national team.
And no, possession alone isn't worth anything but it is the best way to keep your opponent from scoring and exhausting him physically and mentally (which makes scoring youraelf easier). These aspects of Messi's games are discredited completely by you. If a dribbling or a pass doesn't directly lead to a goal, it is pointless in your world.
And finally, you may say that Messi's the second best player in history but you never acknowledge his abilities and utilize evdry occasion for belittling him immediately. If you ask me, you are simply willing to accept everything if it means your idol gets considered the GOAT. See, that's the difference. I idolize Messi because I value his footballing abilities while you value Ronaldo's strengthes because you idolize him.
That's by the way also why Messi supporters value Ronaldo Lima and Ronaldinho so highly. Both these players have unbelievable skillsets that and have much in common with Messi (dribbling, control, passing..). Peak Ronaldo Lima is for me an even better footballer than Messi. That doesn't mean that anyone discredits Cristiano, it is just consequent since they value different aspects of a footballer. Noone will exemplarily argue that they were more consiatent, had better careers or are anywhere near hia mental strength.
Sir, Xavi and Iniesta combo win Euro 2008, WC 2010, and Euro 2012. That was period when Barca was the King and Messi mostly won his BdO awards.
Without the Combo, plus Busquet, Messi wont even achieve BdO that much. Even when Xavi retired, Messi still had Iniesta. If you swap between CR7 and Messi, Barca would still be a King of Europe as long as the majestic legendary combo of Xavi and Iniesta played.
Messi was never be a leader. Not for Barca or Argentina NT. It was Mascherano in 2014 who plateyed as a leader.
And for 2017/2018 season, Messi could outcome CR7 mostly because CR7 injured.
Argentina certainly could do with some leadership from somewhere this WCAnd the other way round. Give Messi Kroos and Modric and Marcelo on LB and Barca tears through the competition again.
You don't need to be the greatest leader if you can play football like Messi. Cristiano's no leader for Madrid either, by the way.
If just your mere presence on the field dictates exactly how your team is going to be set up to play, tactics, tempo, style etc... then you definitely need to be a leader or it all falls apart.And the other way round. Give Messi Kroos and Modric and Marcelo on LB and Barca tears through the competition again.
You don't need to be the greatest leader if you can play football like Messi. Cristiano's no leader for Madrid either, by the way.
He certainly seems capable of doing it in La Liga since the demise of Xaviesta, but seem incapable of it in bigger games in the CL or for Argentina.
Whether possession football is the best way to play football in venturing into the Pep argument, when he has the best collection of players (possibly ever) that are suited to that style (Barca 09-11), it works, but it hasn't worked since, certainly not in the CL knockout ties he keeps losing. If dribbling or a pass doesn't lead to goal it really isn't worth much.
You idolize Messi because you prefer the way he plays, he dribbles down a blind alley then loses the ball and you cream yourself over it, when Ronaldo out jumps NBA players to score headed goals, you're like "so what if he can jump high?"
I prefer Ronaldo because I think he is the most efficient footballer (ever), Messi (to some) is more pleasing on the eye but doesn't have the ruthless efficiency of Ronaldo.
I get the preference for a certain style of play, but I'm certainly not as blinded as those who claim Luiz Ronaldo or Ronaldinho were better than Cristiano. I was a big fan of Van Nistelrooy and he certainly had the record to match most strikers (before these 2), yet I won't make stupid claims like RVN was better than Luiz Ronaldo, which to what I think comparing L Ronaldo to Cristiano is.
Argentina certainly could do with some leadership from somewhere this WC
If just your mere presence on the field dictates exactly how your team is going to be set up to play, tactics, tempo, style etc... then you definitely need to be a leader or it all falls apart.
As we are seeing with this current Argentina squad I suppose.
And the other way round. Give Messi Kroos and Modric and Marcelo on LB and Barca tears through the competition again.
You don't need to be the greatest leader if you can play football like Messi. Cristiano's no leader for Madrid either, by the way.
They both score lots of goals while Messi also creates goals. Can only mean Messi is better?
Discussion ends now
Not Really.
Career goals: Ronaldo 658 vs Messi 616 (Ronaldo score 42 more goals)
Career assists: Ronaldo 208 vs Messi 250 (Messi assist 42 more times)
He certainly seems capable of doing it in La Liga since the demise of Xaviesta, but seem incapable of it in bigger games in the CL or for Argentina.
Whether possession football is the best way to play football in venturing into the Pep argument, when he has the best collection of players (possibly ever) that are suited to that style (Barca 09-11), it works, but it hasn't worked since, certainly not in the CL knockout ties he keeps losing. If dribbling or a pass doesn't lead to goal it really isn't worth much.
You idolize Messi because you prefer the way he plays, he dribbles down a blind alley then loses the ball and you cream yourself over it, when Ronaldo out jumps NBA players to score headed goals, you're like "so what if he can jump high?"
I prefer Ronaldo because I think he is the most efficient footballer (ever), Messi (to some) is more pleasing on the eye but doesn't have the ruthless efficiency of Ronaldo.
I get the preference for a certain style of play, but I'm certainly not as blinded as those who claim Luiz Ronaldo or Ronaldinho were better than Cristiano. I was a big fan of Van Nistelrooy and he certainly had the record to match most strikers (before these 2), yet I won't make stupid claims like RVN was better than Luiz Ronaldo, which to what I think comparing L Ronaldo to Cristiano is.
Sir, Xavi and Iniesta combo win Euro 2008, WC 2010, and Euro 2012. That was period when Barca was the King and Messi mostly won his BdO awards.
Without the Combo, plus Busquet, Messi wont even achieve BdO that much. Even when Xavi retired, Messi still had Iniesta. If you swap between CR7 and Messi, Barca would still be a King of Europe as long as the majestic legendary combo of Xavi and Iniesta played.
Messi was never be a leader. Not for Barca or Argentina NT. It was Mascherano in 2014 who plateyed as a leader.
And for 2017/2018 season, Messi could outcome CR7 mostly because CR7 injured.
The same can be said of the Real Madrid midfield, it just happens to be that Modric and Casemiro don't have a German passport, otherwise the Germans would be absurdly overpowered.
But the legendary combo of Xavi-Iniesta wasn't at the level Messi put them when he exploded, those two had been in the same squad for 4 seaons prior to Messi final eclosion in 2008, in Spain too, and Barcelona had a UCL to show for it, not a treble, and a R16 exit in Germany 2006 with Spain. Same way Real could have one or two UCL titles with that squad minus Ronaldo, but they probably wouldn't get to repeat UCL title, threepeat or win 4 titles in 5 years.
Pretending Casemiro-Kroos-Modric is anywhere as good as Busquets-Xavi-Iniesta can't be serious, especially from a Barcelona fan.
its not the biggest gap.
I agree with most of that.I come in peace, just talking about football, not pushing hype on Messi I swear . And I'm gonna bold the key parts because I ended up with too many lines.
In the part where you say he's doing it in La Liga but not in the big games and that it's not working anymore, you have a point. But I don't think that's because he's not good enough or valid to do so and that's why I always defend his work is underrated, specially in all our defeats and some others with Argentina.
I've been watching almost every Barcelona game for 20 years and believe me, if any player fell short of expectations or failed in his concept, it was Xavi. For almost 10 years he played with an extra gear in his brain that almost no one else had in the the pitch, not even teammates, so we wasted one of the best midfielders ever for a lot of seasons, almost sold him I don't know how many times and always criticized him... but Xavi never really was the problem, the problem, and I know this is a cocky thing to say about a player, were other 8/9 guys playing with him.
What happened is that as he got Ronaldinho, Deco, Iniesta... Xavi found a bunch of teammates that had the same extra gear, this all already started in 2005, when Xavi was probably in the best form of his life and the best player of the team until his ACL tear around December that destroyed him for almost a year (returned 5 months later, wasn't close to form until 12 months later). And when he returned to peak not only he found players in Barcelona with that gear (now Messi too), he went to the Euro and beyond Iniesta he also had Fabregas, Silva, Cazorla, Alonso... he thrived and that's when Xavi really got the praise he probably could've gotten 8 years before had he the tools to play at 100%.
And why is this not happening with Messi?. Well, at Argentina level if he plays in a more CM role like he tries we know he doesn't really fill the Xavi profile, he's a little from Messi, a little from Iniesta and not much from Xavi, still he doesn't have the players to thrive playing that way, from all the players he shares the midfield maybe Banega is the only one close to the bunch of Barça and Spain style I mentioned earlier, but he's inconsistent and doesn't get much playing time, so he tries to come deep and build something, but his teammates don't move around him like they should, he doesn't get the options he needs and he's bound to fight a swarm of defenders almost everytime he tries to do something,
I talked about it the other day using this video as an example, he really doesn't achieve anything there, still what he does there is not easy or something any player can pull out of his hat consistently, yet he does. There's a bunch of technical misshapens /underwhelming decisions that you don't see in other teams, and much less on Barcelona, in the first one Higuain is slow to open into the wing, Meza gets ignored and then occupies the exact same space as Higuain, Pavon puts an awful cross. Second one Higuain cops out as a link option and burst into the area giving his back to Leo, Acuña does nothing to help, Meza at least is in a good (but hard to send the ball) position and Mascherano, they guy who knows Leo better, is the only one offering him an option (and he's the DM inside the rival area), there's other examples like in the last play, when he drives the ball 40 meters deeper but 3 Argentina players WALK from midfield to the area, and then Dybala, unmarked, gets the ball just to misscontrol it in the second touch and undo half the advance Leo achieved with a pass back.
I will point out, because it seems I have to in this thread, that I'm not actually saying that what he does there is "goat material", "bringing victory on a silver platter to Argentina" or anything in that line, I'm just saying he has a set of tools, he's trying to utilize them, but no one in that team knows how to work with tem. Then people will point at distance covered, but he's reserving his energy for exactly plays like this, is the way they reached the final in 2014, he did that in group phase, it was the thing he did before assisting Di Maria vs Switzerland, the same thing he did in the build-up to Higuain goal, or to most of Argentina's chances in the final, that's why I fight people saying he did nothing in those games.
And what about Barcelona you'll say? Well, surely Iniesta and Xavi thrived there and Leo isn't in the past 2/3 seasons, but we have to remember, Iniesta and Xavi had eachother in prime condition, Xavi was lost for years until he found Iniesta, but they didn't hit monster form until they had another player there like Messi (in a way, it was Dinho before that) and other absurdly good players like Henry, Villa or Alves. Now, Messi doesn't have a Xavi (I love Rakitic, but he's not even close, Modric could do something closer), Iniesta is still there, but if you watch him, his downfall has been evidently, he has half the legs he had back in 2008/2012, the mental speed is there but the body doesn't keep up, and then there was Neymar, as good as a player he was he's not the Barcelona style, he could work if Messi wasn't there, we can always use a player that can make the difference, but when he has 4/5 players building up behind him, it wasn't the case, that's why we won the treble playing counter-attack football, and have sucked in Europe since abandoning that idea and trying to return to the roots.
Finally, after this spam wall you might just say "that's why I'd choose Ronaldo, he doesn't need those nuances to just win", you're right, I never argued against that, I even said the other day if I have to put the cherry on a team like Portugal or even Argentina, I'd pick Ronaldo. But people here, comparing Ronaldo and Leo in stats only like goals or chances, are asking of Leo to play like Ronaldo, he won't get anything done if he just stays between CB's to win aerial duels, or if he makes runs into the area without the ball.
But the idea that Messi needs a exact type of players to thrive is no accurate either, he won a treble playing non-barça style with Ney and Suarez, he came super close to a WC and 2 Copa Americas just by being the #10 in an organized, decent team. What's happening this summer? Well they're not organized, they don't know what they're playing at (look at the lineups in their last 5 games) and we're still waiting for any other player to show up with Argentina, Messi tries, Agüero scored, the rest have done more harm than good so far, probably the pressure of having to perform in a team without identity.
important to mention the appearance numbers here.
Sorry @Peyroteo but your underrating of Toni kroos there is despicable.
You mean this season? Ronaldo score 44 goals in 44 appearance, Messi scored 45 goals in 54 appearance
For WC, Ronaldo score 4 goals in 2 appearance, Messi scored 0 goals in 2 appearance.
I agree with most of that.
Pretending Casemiro-Kroos-Modric is anywhere as good as Busquets-Xavi-Iniesta can't be serious, especially from a Barcelona fan.
No, I just actually watched him play throughout the season. What happened in the Mexico game has been happening all season. Other Madrid fans said the exact same thing here, but for a lot of people all it takes is being Ronaldo's teammate and suddenly you're immune to criticism.
During the season it was all about how Messi didn't have a good midfield behind him... Busquets has been running things for Spain, Rakitic dominating the midfield as usual for Croatia and Coutinho has been the star player for Brazil. Busquets is better than Casemiro, Modric is better than Coutinho and Rakitic is about as good as Kroos, so where is the big disadvantage? People trying to compare their teammates now as if it's anywhere near the same difference as it was in their primes in 2009-2013 either don't watch them play or they're doing the usual scapegoating that's becoming a tradition for Messi.
Kroos is ridiculously good, you let him 10 seconds alone and he finds the way to hurt you
Madrid fans have been wanting to replace half their team because they've been terrible for the whole season. They performed at a good level for a hand full of games.
Bayern absolutely hammered their goal in the CL semi but they had horrendous finishing.
Modric is the only one that could match that Barca midfield. Kroos and especially Casemiro cannot touch that Barca midfield.
What happened vs Mexico was that Kroos had two players (Vela and Lozano) taking turns at man-marking him so he couldn't touch the ball, the Spanish pundits had a good laugh at how absurd but efficient that strat was, and still, once Kroos broke from his chains in the last ~15 minutes, he managed to create a chance and almost score in one minute, and I'm not being biased because this is the MvR thread, I already said that a week ago.
The comparison of this season, Rakitic has Modric at his side with Croatia, not 34 y/o Iniesta and his defensive duties are probably reduced (Croatia play deeper than Barcelona, he has to cover less ground on sprints), Coutinho played 1k minutes with Messi but none of them in the UCL (the place our midfield struggles the most).
We'll see next season, if we get to field a balanced midfield, I've been waiting for Valverde to play some sort of 4-5-1 with Busi-Rakitic as DM, and a front 3 of Coutinho, Messi and Dembele, that's been my hope since the 2nd leg vs Roma, you can mark this post tho, if we play a 442 with Coutinho,Rakitic,Busquets and Dembele and Messi being a second striker or an extra midfielder... I'm gonna cry a river and we will suck at midfield, again.
You think?
You think?
You think?
You don’t think?