Messi v Ronaldo | Contains double your daily salt allowance

Messi or Ronaldo

  • Messi

  • Ronaldo


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Messi cult and dribbling again. It's incredible.

How can you discount dribbling? It’s because you know you/Ronaldo are well and truely beaten in this respect.

Dribbling allows you to beat a man from out wide, or go through 5 or 6 players from unfavourable positions as Messi regularly does. It takes pressure off your team allowing them to regain position, it helps you retain possession whilst under pressure, all things Messi can offer better than Ronaldo.
 
Ronaldo will be remembered as a great great goalscorer, as Gerd Muller. Messi as the Goat with Maradona and Pele.
 
How can you discount dribbling? It’s because you know you/Ronaldo are well and truely beaten in this respect.

Dribbling allows you to beat a man from out wide, or go through 5 or 6 players from unfavourable positions as Messi regularly does. It takes pressure off your team allowing them to regain position, it helps you retain possession whilst under pressure, all things Messi can offer better than Ronaldo.
The way the Messi cult go on about it, it's as if dribbling is the main aim of football rather than scoring. :rolleyes:

Messi regularly goes through 5 or 6 players? :lol: In that case Ronaldo regularly scores from 40 yards out.
 
The way the Messi cult go on about it, it's as if dribbling is the main aim of football rather than scoring. :rolleyes:

Messi regularly goes through 5 or 6 players? :lol: In that case Ronaldo regularly scores from 40 yards out.

Compared to almost any other player in history, yeah. Forget I wrote regularly though, can’t you see the value in dribbling? Not to mention his passing ability. The fact that he does this whilst matching Ronaldo’s productivity should indicate he’s the better player.
 
Compared to almost any other player in history, yeah. Forget I wrote regularly though, can’t you see the value in dribbling? Not to mention his passing ability. The fact that he does this whilst matching Ronaldo’s productivity should indicate he’s the better player.
I'm not saying dribbling is useless, but it's not also a vital factor like you Messi cult go on and on about.

There are many things that help, but none given as much importance as "dribbling" by the followed of St Lionel

Successful dribbles? You could end up further away from the opposition goals than when you started. How exactly does that help your team?
 
I'm not saying dribbling is useless, but it's not also a vital factor like you Messi cult go on and on about.

There are many things that help, but none given as much importance as "dribbling" by the followed of St Lionel

Successful dribbles? You could end up further away from the opposition goals than when you started. How exactly does that help your team?

You’re really reaching here now trying to discredit dribbling by suggesting you could be dribbling away from goal. Also, yes, under some circumstances that would help your team.

And what’s with the Trumpesque name calling? ‘Messi Cult’. He’s considered better by most people on the caf. You’re trying to undermine an appreciation of a more gifted player.
 
You’re really reaching here now trying to discredit dribbling by suggesting you could be dribbling away from goal. Also, yes, under some circumstances that would help your team.

And what’s with the Trumpesque name calling? ‘Messi Cult’. He’s considered better by most people on the caf. You’re trying to undermine an appreciation of a more gifted player.
I'm just pointing out that successful dribble is such a pointless statistic because it doesn't matter in which direction you dribbled.

I was requested not to use Messi brigade, so am using Messi cult. How about followers of St Lionel?
 
I dug up classico stats (Guess I'm a newbie):

Matches
Messi: played 37, won 17, drawn 8, lost 12
Ronaldo: played 29, won 8, drawn 7, lost 14
Goals
Messi: 25
Ronaldo: 17
Assists
Messi: 14
Ronaldo: 1
Created chances
Messi: 65
Ronaldo: 15

@Cal? be interesting to see how you can swing this one in your mans favour. Games against each other with both on the park (and presumably Ronaldo’s competitiveness at its peak since he’s so desperate to beat his rival to personal accolades, doing it on the pitch he shares with his rival seems a great place to showcase it)
 
I'm just pointing out that successful dribble is such a pointless statistic because it doesn't matter in which direction you dribbled.

Because they are very close in the amount of goals scored, in their careers, in La Liga and in CL. Albeit Ronaldo has more knockout stage goals than Messi, but Messi has more vital goals in La Liga. I won't mention assists cos Messi is streets ahead.

So because they are close in goals along with team trophies and individual trophies, we then have to look at all the other aspects of their game.

You know fine well that Messi has the most successful forward dribbles of any player on the planet by some distance in the last decade. Just because he is better than Ronaldo at dribbling, passing, key passing, creativity etc doesn't mean you have to dismiss what he is better than Ronaldo at. Oh yeah Ronaldo is better in the air though. And "works harder in the gym and training" which is probably a myth anyway.

Please tell everyone, apart from his goal scoring in big games, (which is debatable anyway) what is he actually better than Messi at?
 
@Cal? be interesting to see how you can swing this one in your mans favour. Games against each other with both on the park (and presumably Ronaldo’s competitiveness at its peak since he’s so desperate to beat his rival to personal accolades, doing it on the pitch he shares with his rival seems a great place to showcase it)
That is not a list of games they played against each other. Messi's better record obviously has a lot to do with the better team he played in for much longer.
 
Because they are very close in the amount of goals scored, in their careers, in La Liga and in CL. Albeit Ronaldo has more knockout stage goals than Messi, but Messi has more vital goals in La Liga. I won't mention assists cos Messi is streets ahead.

So because they are close in goals along with team trophies and individual trophies, we then have to look at all the other aspects of their game.

You know fine well that Messi has the most successful forward dribbles of any player on the planet by some distance in the last decade. Just because he is better than Ronaldo at dribbling, passing, key passing, creativity etc doesn't mean you have to dismiss what he is better than Ronaldo at. Oh yeah Ronaldo is better in the air though. And "works harder in the gym and training" which is probably a myth anyway.

Please tell everyone, apart from his goal scoring in big games, (which is debatable anyway) what is he actually better than Messi at?
:lol: When Ronaldo is clearly much better (CL knockout stage, etc), it is somehow debatable according to you.

When Messi is arguably better at something (passing, key passing - so basically assists), you make it sound like it's undeniable, despite the fact that Ronaldo has more assists in the CL.

Also the way you kind of brush off "better in the air" as if that's a non-factor. :lol:
 
Messi for me. Going by the poll, looks like cafe thinks so to.
i think there is nothing left to say in Messi v Ronaldo debate. Its just how a person prefer one trait over another, and how he sees football.
 
Meanwhile while some mentioned who vs who scored against, he're my CL table updated.
Note that the number of assists of Messi varies greatly from the sites I looked, from 24 to 34 (!), I have no idea why. Ronaldo seems to be around 40 to 42.
I guess because they are not "official" it varies according to the definition of that site.
In this I used Transfermarket site that lists both the high numbers of assists I've seen for both players.
I don't have the assist information but it would be great to check the numbers and add the club against too.

Assists in the CL:

Messi 34 in 124 apps (0.27 assists/app)
Ronaldo 42 in 149 apps (0.28 assists/app)

Goals scored in CL:

Messi 100 in 124 apps (0.81 goals/app)
Ronaldo 119 in 149 apps (0.80 goals/app)

Messi has 60 goals in the group stages (60%) and 40 (40%) in the knockout stages.
Ronaldo has 60 goals in the group stages (50%) and 59 (50%) in the knockout stages.

Round of 16: Messi 24 goals (24%) Ronaldo 20 goals (17%)
Quarter-Finals: Messi 10 goals (10%) Ronaldo 22 goals (18%)
Semi-Finals: Messi 4 goals (4%) Ronaldo 13 goals (11%)
Finals: Messi 2 goals (2%) Ronaldo 4 goals (3%)

Messi:

Arsenal 9
Celtic Glasgow 8
AC Milan 8
Bayer Leverkusen 7
Ajax 6
Manchester City 6
Bayern Munchen 4
Panathinaikos 4
Paris Saint-Germain 4
Spartak Moskva 4
APOEL Nicosia 3
Chelsea 3
Kobenhavn 3
Lyon 3
Plzen 3
Shakhtar Donetsk 3
Stuttgart 3
Basel 2
BATE Borisov 2
Dynamo Kyiv 2
Juventus 2
Manchester United 2
Real Madrid 2
Roma 2
Borussia Monchengladbach 1
Glasgow Rangers 1
Olympiakos 1
Sporting CP 1
Werder Bremen 1

England 20 (Arsenal 9, Manchester City 6, Chelsea 3, Manchester United 2)
Germany 16 (Bayer Leverkusen 7, Bayern Munchen 4, Stuttgart 3, Borussia Monchengladbach 1, Werder Bremen 1)
Italy 12 (AC Milan 8, Juventus 2, Roma 2)
Scotland 9 (Celtic Glasgow 8, Glasgow Rangers 1)
France 7 (Paris Saint-Germain 4, Lyon 3)
Netherlands 6 (Ajax 6)
Greece 5 (Panathinaikos 4, Olympiakos 1)
Ukraine 5 (Shakhtar Donetsk 3, Dynamo Kyiv 2)
Russia 4 (Spartak Moskva 4)
Cyprus 3 (APOEL Nicosia 3)
Czech Republic 3 (Plzen 3)
Denmark 3 (Kobenhavn 3)
Belarus 2 (BATE Borisov 2)
Spain 2 (Real Madrid 2)
Switzerland 2 (Basel 2)
Portugal 1 (Sporting CP 1)

Ronaldo:

Bayern Munchen 9
Juventus 9
Ajax 7
Borussia Dortmund 7
Schalke 04 7
APOEL Nicosia 6
Galatasaray 6
Malmo 6
Roma 5
Shakhtar Donetsk 5
Atlético Madrid 4
Lyon 4
Marseille 4
Tottenham 4
CSKA Moskva 3
Dynamo Kyiv 3
Kobenhavn 3
Paris Saint-Germain 3
Sporting CP 3
Wolfsburg 3
Arsenal 2
Basel 2
Ludogorets 2
Manchester United 2
AC Milan 2
Zurich 2
Auxerre 1
Chelsea 1
Inter 1
Liverpool 1
Manchester City 1
FC Porto 1

Germany 26 (Bayern Munchen 9, Borussia Dortmund 7, Schalke 04 7, Wolfsburg 3)
Italy 17 (Juventus 9, Roma 5, AC Milan 2, Inter 1)
France 12 (Lyon 4, Marseille 4, Paris Saint-Germain 3, Auxerre 1)
England 11 (Tottenham 4, Arsenal 2, Manchester United 2, Chelsea 1, Liverpool 1, Manchester City 1)
Ukraine 8 (Shakhtar Donetsk 5, Dynamo Kyiv 3)
Netherlands 7 (Ajax 7)
Cyprus 6 (APOEL Nicosia 6)
Sweden 6 (Malmo 6)
Turkey 6 (Galatasaray 6)
Portugal 4 (Sporting CP 3, FC Porto 1)
Spain 4 (Atlético Madrid 4)
Switzerland 4 (Basel 2, Zurich 2)
Denmark 3 (Kobenhavn 3)
Russia 3 (CSKA Moskva 3)
Bulgaria 2 (Ludogorets 2)
 
:lol: When Ronaldo is clearly much better (CL knockout stage, etc), it is somehow debatable according to you.

When Messi is arguably better at something (passing, key passing - so basically assists), you make it sound like it's undeniable, despite the fact that Ronaldo has more assists in the CL.

Also the way you kind of brush off "better in the air" as if that's a non-factor. :lol:

Messi is clearly better at passing than Ronaldo, you have to be blind to don't acknowledge it. Messi has more assists than Ronaldo in all competitions despite playing 200 matches less and being 2 years younger. The fact that Ronaldo has more assists in CL doesn't mean he's a better passer ffs. It's like saying Messi is as good as Ronaldo at headers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Messi is clearly better at passing than Ronaldo, you have to be blind to don't acknowledge it. Messi has more assists than Ronaldo in all competitions despite playing 200 matches less and being 2 years younger. The fact that Ronaldo has more assists in CL doesn't mean he's a better passer ffs. It's like saying Messi is as good as Ronaldo at headers.


But Real Madrid and Ronaldo don’t take the Copa Del Rey seriously, blah blah.

He may have more assists in the CL, but a pass across the box etc is much easier to do than a defence splitting pass.

This guy is arguing Ronaldo’s case based on the CL alone, which is ridiculous. Anyone who watches football without relying on Americanised stats can see with their eyes who the better player is.

I am a United fan and loved Ronaldo for years, but as soon as I started watching Barcelona and Madrid play regularly, I realised that I was fairly mistaken.
 
Messi is clearly better at passing than Ronaldo, you have to be blind to don't acknowledge it. Messi has more assists than Ronaldo in all competitions despite playing 200 matches less and being 2 years younger. The fact that Ronaldo has more assists in CL doesn't mean he's a better passer ffs. It's like saying Messi is as good as Ronaldo at headers.
Messi was more successful at a younger age mainly due to playing in a vastly better team with Xaviesta & co. He's no longer anywhere near as successful once Xavi left and Iniesta got worse.

The fact is Ronaldo does have more CL assists.

In no competition does Messi score more headers, so it's a stupid comparison.

But Real Madrid and Ronaldo don’t take the Copa Del Rey seriously, blah blah.

He may have more assists in the CL, but a pass across the box etc is much easier to do than a defence splitting pass.

This guy is arguing Ronaldo’s case based on the CL alone, which is ridiculous. Anyone who watches football without relying on Americanised stats can see with their eyes who the better player is.

I am a United fan and loved Ronaldo for years, but as soon as I started watching Barcelona and Madrid play regularly, I realised that I was fairly mistaken.
There we go with you followers of St Lionel again. If you are going to repeat your opinion as facts ad nauseam, there really is no point discussing anything.
 
Messi was more successful at a younger age mainly due to playing in a vastly better team with Xaviesta & co. He's no longer anywhere near as successful once Xavi left and Iniesta got worse.

The fact is Ronaldo does have more CL assists.

In no competition does Messi score more headers, so it's a stupid comparison.


There we go with you followers of St Lionel again. If you are going to repeat your opinion as facts ad nauseam, there really is no point discussing anything.
In fairness to him, the significant majority (at least from what I've gauged) would agree that by watching the players alone Messi is the superior player.
 
In fairness to him, the significant majority (at least from what I've gauged) would agree that by watching the players alone Messi is the superior player.
There is literally a poll at the top of this page that shows it being roughly 60-40, whilst that is a majority, calling it a "significantly" majority is grossly overstating it.
 
There is literally a poll at the top of this page that shows it being roughly 60-40, whilst that is a majority, calling it a "significantly" majority is grossly overstating it.

The poll is pointless now. Its literally a choice between anyone not named messi and ronaldo.
 
There is literally a poll at the top of this page that shows it being roughly 60-40, whilst that is a majority, calling it a "significantly" majority is grossly overstating it.
Sorry I meant the significant majority not on a Manchester United forum. Our poll will clearly be a bit bias.
 
:lol: When Ronaldo is clearly much better (CL knockout stage, etc), it is somehow debatable according to you.

When Messi is arguably better at something (passing, key passing - so basically assists), you make it sound like it's undeniable, despite the fact that Ronaldo has more assists in the CL.

Also the way you kind of brush off "better in the air" as if that's a non-factor. :lol:

You think it's "arguable" that Messi is a better passer?

I'm done. I can't even be arsed debating it any more.
 
Messi was more successful at a younger age mainly due to playing in a vastly better team with Xaviesta & co. He's no longer anywhere near as successful once Xavi left and Iniesta got worse.

The fact is Ronaldo does have more CL assists.

In no competition does Messi score more headers, so it's a stupid comparison.


There we go with you followers of St Lionel again. If you are going to repeat your opinion as facts ad nauseam, there really is no point discussing anything.
And Ronaldo is comparatively more successful, team wise because he has World class players like Modric, Marcelo, kroos and Isco behind him, not like he takes the ball in mf and skips past players and scores himself when things aren’t going his way, or wait, that’s exactly what Messi does, Ronaldo just waits until he gets the right service, granted his movement is really good but to be successful he needs the right service from world class players, not Messi
 
That is not a list of games they played against each other. Messi's better record obviously has a lot to do with the better team he played in for much longer.
Surely you can agree Messi has been better in El Classico though right?
 
Surely you can agree Messi has been better in El Classico though right?

He says the better team, it isn’t like Ron has played for Salford City, he played for Man United, who managed to get to 2 more CL finals once he left. And Real Madrid.

Barca were so successful because of Messi, they wouldn’t have been anywhere near as good without him. They would certainly have not won the treble and United would have probably beaten them in at least one of the CL finals without him.
 
Messi was more successful at a younger age mainly due to playing in a vastly better team with Xaviesta & co. He's no longer anywhere near as successful once Xavi left and Iniesta got worse.

The fact is Ronaldo does have more CL assists.

In no competition does Messi score more headers, so it's a stupid comparison.


There we go with you followers of St Lionel again. If you are going to repeat your opinion as facts ad nauseam, there really is no point discussing anything.

That's completely irrelevant to my point, we're arguing about who is the better passer.

If you seriously think that Ronaldo is a better passer only because he has more assists than Messi in CL you need to watch Messi more.

You completely ignored the part where I said that Messi has more assists than Ronaldo in all competitions despite playing 200 matches less and the fact that Messi creates statistically more chances than Ronaldo, which should be a proof that Messi is a better playmaker.
 
Sorry I meant the significant majority not on a Manchester United forum. Our poll will clearly be a bit bias.
Not true, this poll has about 500,000 votes and it's still around 60-40.

http://messivsronaldo.net/
And Ronaldo is comparatively more successful, team wise because he has World class players like Modric, Marcelo, kroos and Isco behind him, not like he takes the ball in mf and skips past players and scores himself when things aren’t going his way, or wait, that’s exactly what Messi does, Ronaldo just waits until he gets the right service, granted his movement is really good but to be successful he needs the right service from world class players, not Messi
When Ronaldo is successful, it's because of his team mates, yet with Messi, he does it all himself? :lol:

Do explain why Messi FC has gone out in the CL QF 3 times in the last 4 seasons since the demise of Xaviesta.

Surely you can agree Messi has been better in El Classico though right?
Barcelona has a better record in El Clasico in the past decade or so.
He says the better team, it isn’t like Ron has played for Salford City, he played for Man United, who managed to get to 2 more CL finals once he left. And Real Madrid.

Barca were so successful because of Messi, they wouldn’t have been anywhere near as good without him. They would certainly have not won the treble and United would have probably beaten them in at least one of the CL finals without him.
Are you denying that Messi had the better team mates in that 09-11 team under St Pep?

Real are so successful because of Ronaldo, they wouldn’t have been anywhere near as good without him. They would certainly have not retained the CL, etc, etc...
 
Not true, this poll has about 500,000 votes and it's still around 60-40.

http://messivsronaldo.net/

When Ronaldo is successful, it's because of his team mates, yet with Messi, he does it all himself? :lol:

Do explain why Messi FC has gone out in the CL QF 3 times in the last 4 seasons since the demise of Xaviesta.


Barcelona has a better record in El Clasico in the past decade or so.

Are you denying that Messi had the better team mates in that 09-11 team under St Pep?

Real are so successful because of Ronaldo, they wouldn’t have been anywhere near as good without him. They would certainly have not retained the CL, etc, etc...
DO explain why Ronaldo FC didn't win the CL until 2014 when the likes of Modric arrived?
Barca were successful because of Messi and Real have been successful after the arrival of the likes of Modric, Ronaldo played a part, that I'd agree. Ronaldo couldn't win the CL with Real during his prime but Messi did it and now that he has passed his prime and is mainly a goal scorer, suddenly their success is due to him?? the irony
 
DO explain why Ronaldo FC didn't win the CL until 2014 when the likes of Modric arrived?
Barca were successful because of Messi and Real have been successful after the arrival of the likes of Modric, Ronaldo played a part, that I'd agree. Ronaldo couldn't win the CL with Real during his prime but Messi did it and now that he has passed his prime and is mainly a goal scorer, suddenly their success is due to him?? the irony
If your seriously think that Real owe their CL success to the likes of Modric more than Ronaldo, deluded wouldn't begin to describe your condition.

As for Barca being successful because of Messi? Ovebro did much more for them in 2009 in the scandal of Stamford Bridge. In 2011 there was the scandal of Bernabeu.
 
If your seriously think that Real owe their CL success to the likes of Modric more than Ronaldo, deluded wouldn't begin to describe your condition.

As for Barca being successful because of Messi? Ovebro did much more for them in 2009 in the scandal of Stamford Bridge. In 2011 there was the scandal of Bernabeu.
Are you denying that all CRs goals were legitimate in the knockout games in the last couple of years, if I remember correctly, Abidal was sent off unjustly in 09 and there were decisions that went against us in the first leg but no one pats an eye on that. If only we had the same run in that Real had in 2014, we'd most likely have won it as well, we wouldn't have needed help from the ref. I agree that we've got favourable decisions in the past but why ignore mistakes made by the ref when it doesn't suit your agenda. Even last season in the league, there were so many decisions that went against us, if not for these decisions, CR would only have won 1 league title in 9 years, bloody hell that is awful. I still don't understand how the great CR has only won 2 league titles in 9 years. If not for your delusion, many people would appreciate CR more but when you just argue without any pragmatism, that's when people come up with their own agenda, I mean scoring goals is more important but creating them is not, only you can come up with such logic. I'd think that CR was a hybrid of Maradona and Pele who didn't need people behind him creating chances for him to score in the knockout games, he'd just get the ball in his own half, skip past all the players, lift the ball up himself and score via an overhead kick. I wonder why teams look for players who can dribble, honestly, that's just plain awful, what has dribbling got to do with scoring goals and creating chances. I feel for Benzema as well, he would have had thrice as many goals had he not played alongside CR, oh yeah but he game him a penalty in a game that was already won, I wish he had joined United in 09, he was immense for Lyon, granted he has more trophies and has been a success team wise but there was a time where he could have been one of the best players in the world, then CR happened.
 
DO explain why Ronaldo FC didn't win the CL until 2014 when the likes of Modric arrived?
Barca were successful because of Messi and Real have been successful after the arrival of the likes of Modric, Ronaldo played a part, that I'd agree. Ronaldo couldn't win the CL with Real during his prime but Messi did it and now that he has passed his prime and is mainly a goal scorer, suddenly their success is due to him?? the irony

Ronaldo is at least 80% of the reason Madrid have been able to win the CL in 3 of the last 4 years. This rings true particularly for the wins in 2016 and 2017. I've already posted this before but where were the likes of Modric and Kroos in season defining games like the CL quarters in both 2016 and 2017?

It was Ronaldo who (through sheer desperation and desire to win) was able to grab the game by the scruff of the neck in that return game against Wolfsburg in 2016 after Madrid's disastrous first leg performance and swing the tie in his team's favour by scoring a sensational hat-trick to cancel out Wolfsburg's 2-0 advantage from the 1st game. No Ronaldo and the CL run ends there. That season he scored or assisted 77% of Real Madrid's goals in the whole campaign for Europe.

Again in 2017, the team were being dominated by Bayern in the early stages of the QF 1st leg and went 1-0 down and almost 2-0 before the break had Vidal converted his penalty. Modric and Kroos were being overrun in the midfield and NOWHERE to be seen for the entire half. Alas, Ronaldo pops out of nowhere against the run of play to equalise with a finish on the volley from a routine Carvajal cross from the RW. He then followed it up with smart dribbling on the wing to draw a foul and yellow card from Martinez and then minutes later with further smart movement on the ball was able to draw a 2nd yellow and foul from Martinez which reduced Bayern to 10-men. ONLY then did you see Modric and Kroos start playing. And ofcourse, CR went on to seal the winner late on.

This is to not even mention his performances in the 2nd leg all the way up to the final.

Even this season, neither Modric nor Kroos started the 2nd leg at PSG but Madrid were still able to dominate and control the game (with a double pivot in midfield) and Ronaldo was still yet again able to grab the crucial goal and assist that gave his team a 1-2 victory.

Yes, Modric and Kroos have been crucial components to the team but it's not like Madrid were being eliminated in the group stages before they arrived. They were just always unlucky when Ronaldo was at his absolute peak. The semis in 2012 they were on the cusp of the final had it not been for penalties and in 2013 only needed 1 more goal to overturn Dortmund's large 1st leg victory (Modric played btw).

Replace Ronaldo any other top forward for Madrid in the last 5 years and I gurantee the wouldn't have dominated the CL like they have.

The 2014 win was probably the least Ronaldo dependant one with guys like Ramos, Di Maria etc there to step up massively. Bale and Benzema were also great these seasons to go along with Modric.
 
The people who say that Madrid are not reliant on Ronaldo like Barca are reliant on Messi and would still be great without him are the same people who will turn around and say that had he been on form in the earlier part of the season then Madrid would have still been competing with Barca for the league. Which one is it?
 
Ronaldo is at least 80% of the reason Madrid have been able to win the CL in 3 of the last 4 years. This rings true particularly for the wins in 2016 and 2017. I've already posted this before but where were the likes of Modric and Kroos in season defining games like the CL quarters in both 2016 and 2017?

It was Ronaldo who (through sheer desperation and desire to win) was able to grab the game by the scruff of the neck in that return game against Wolfsburg in 2016 after Madrid's disastrous first leg performance and swing the tie in his team's favour by scoring a sensational hat-trick to cancel out Wolfsburg's 2-0 advantage from the 1st game. No Ronaldo and the CL run ends there. That season he scored or assisted 77% of Real Madrid's goals in the whole campaign for Europe.

Again in 2017, the team were being dominated by Bayern in the early stages of the QF 1st leg and went 1-0 down and almost 2-0 before the break had Vidal converted his penalty. Modric and Kroos were being overrun in the midfield and NOWHERE to be seen for the entire half. Alas, Ronaldo pops out of nowhere against the run of play to equalise with a finish on the volley from a routine Carvajal cross from the RW. He then followed it up with smart dribbling on the wing to draw a foul and yellow card from Martinez and then minutes later with further smart movement on the ball was able to draw a 2nd yellow and foul from Martinez which reduced Bayern to 10-men. ONLY then did you see Modric and Kroos start playing. And ofcourse, CR went on to seal the winner late on.

This is to not even mention his performances in the 2nd leg all the way up to the final.

Even this season, neither Modric nor Kroos started the 2nd leg at PSG but Madrid were still able to dominate and control the game (with a double pivot in midfield) and Ronaldo was still yet again able to grab the crucial goal and assist that gave his team a 1-2 victory.

Yes, Modric and Kroos have been crucial components to the team but it's not like Madrid were being eliminated in the group stages before they arrived. They were just always unlucky when Ronaldo was at his absolute peak. The semis in 2012 they were on the cusp of the final had it not been for penalties and in 2013 only needed 1 more goal to overturn Dortmund's large 1st leg victory (Modric played btw).

Replace Ronaldo any other top forward for Madrid in the last 5 years and I gurantee the wouldn't have dominated the CL like they have.

The 2014 win was probably the least Ronaldo dependant one with guys like Ramos, Di Maria etc there to step up massively. Bale and Benzema were also great these seasons to go along with Modric.

Under Jose (2011-13) in the CL, Real lost to Bayern, Barca, and Dortmund. The only big team they beat in the CL was United (they needed that bullshit red card for Nani) in R16 and Dortmund in the groups. They literally didn't face another top team at all - Galatasaray, CSKA Moscow, APOEL, Lyon, and Harry Redknapp's Spurs. Before that (with Ronaldo in the team) they lost to Lyon in R16.
The 1st big team that Real beat in Europe KO games since Ronaldo joined was United in 2013. They drastically changed their playstyle and personnel under Ancelotti and Zidane, and beat Dortmund and Atletico (2014), Atletico (2014), City and Atletico (2015), and Bayern, Atletico, and Juve (2016/17), PSG (2018).
 
Ronaldo is at least 80% of the reason Madrid have been able to win the CL in 3 of the last 4 years. This rings true particularly for the wins in 2016 and 2017. I've already posted this before but where were the likes of Modric and Kroos in season defining games like the CL quarters in both 2016 and 2017?

It was Ronaldo who (through sheer desperation and desire to win) was able to grab the game by the scruff of the neck in that return game against Wolfsburg in 2016 after Madrid's disastrous first leg performance and swing the tie in his team's favour by scoring a sensational hat-trick to cancel out Wolfsburg's 2-0 advantage from the 1st game. No Ronaldo and the CL run ends there. That season he scored or assisted 77% of Real Madrid's goals in the whole campaign for Europe.

Again in 2017, the team were being dominated by Bayern in the early stages of the QF 1st leg and went 1-0 down and almost 2-0 before the break had Vidal converted his penalty. Modric and Kroos were being overrun in the midfield and NOWHERE to be seen for the entire half. Alas, Ronaldo pops out of nowhere against the run of play to equalise with a finish on the volley from a routine Carvajal cross from the RW. He then followed it up with smart dribbling on the wing to draw a foul and yellow card from Martinez and then minutes later with further smart movement on the ball was able to draw a 2nd yellow and foul from Martinez which reduced Bayern to 10-men. ONLY then did you see Modric and Kroos start playing. And ofcourse, CR went on to seal the winner late on.

This is to not even mention his performances in the 2nd leg all the way up to the final.

Even this season, neither Modric nor Kroos started the 2nd leg at PSG but Madrid were still able to dominate and control the game (with a double pivot in midfield) and Ronaldo was still yet again able to grab the crucial goal and assist that gave his team a 1-2 victory.

Yes, Modric and Kroos have been crucial components to the team but it's not like Madrid were being eliminated in the group stages before they arrived. They were just always unlucky when Ronaldo was at his absolute peak. The semis in 2012 they were on the cusp of the final had it not been for penalties and in 2013 only needed 1 more goal to overturn Dortmund's large 1st leg victory (Modric played btw).

Replace Ronaldo any other top forward for Madrid in the last 5 years and I gurantee the wouldn't have dominated the CL like they have.

The 2014 win was probably the least Ronaldo dependant one with guys like Ramos, Di Maria etc there to step up massively. Bale and Benzema were also great these seasons to go along with Modric.
No one denies that he was instrumental but when one denies that Messi was not the man who made our most successful period in history possible, we use their own logic against them. I saw a post recently claiming that Messi's second goal against rm in 11 was not that great because they weren't arsed anymore, come on, that was one of the greatest goals in cl history against our biggest rivals in the semi final and these guys say go on to give excuses. For goodness sake, it's okay to have an opinion that CR is better, but atleast have arguments that are consistent to back it up. Anyways, I'd rather enjoy Messi for the the last few years of his career and dread CR since I am Barca fan but neutrals can enjoy the two of them in their own ways, there is an agenda for Messi here as well but the way these guys throw insults at Messi pisses me off.
 
Would a Madrid fan rather lose Kroosic or Ronaldo? I think the answer might surprise some people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.