People prefer to not see the logical and obvious answers with Messi and Cristiano, many times opting for what's not logical, and I never understood why. Sure it's not the same Messi as before, but it baffles me how can anyone think he couldn't perform well in the PL even at this age. Sure, 50 goals and 20 assists, maybe not, but why do Messi and Cristiano still need to score 50 goals a year to be considered useful to their teams? Ibrahimovic joined us and still performed well at 37 years. Ronaldo obviously not being the same player and having a couple bad patches, as a goalscorer 2 seasons ago, scored fantastic goals and screamers with a solid 18 PL goals, whilst being finished, putting up numbers that for most other goalscorers at their peak would be their career highlight.
Seriously, Messi couldn't come to the PL and score 15 goals and assist another 15 goals (CL included)? Would that not be useful to a team? Even with all the drawbacks of a +35 years old player (disconsidering wages for a moment, here)? It's like these 2 players are worthless unless they're hitting alien numbers each season. A very large part of PL offensive players that have come by throughout 20-30 years of the competition don't even get to hit more than 30 goal contributions per year, some of them considered great players regardless (and rightly so), but if it's Messi coming in, unless it's 50G+A, he's worthless and has no quality for the PL?
In my case I don't think it's a question of people overrating PL, it's underrating Messi as a player even at this age.