Dve
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2019
- Messages
- 3,175
David Neres = AM. Not good news for those wanting to sell McTominay.
David Neres = AM. Not good news for those wanting to sell McTominay.
Replaced with Lukaku.Osimhen its being moved on
David Neres = AM. Not good news for those wanting to sell McTominay.
No one is paying more than £20m for McTomminey, that much is sadly evident. In his ‘banner’ season he only managed 7 goals in the Premiership, never remotely looked like getting even that many before and no saying he will even match that this season.No one's paying more than £30m-40m for McTominay.
I think he could easily get 10+ goals a season if played regularly in a free role behind the striker. If you disagree fair enough.
David Neres = AM. Not good news for those wanting to sell McTominay.
They aren't even remotely similar players...
Alright, good to know. On Whoscored he's labeled as Attacking Midfielder (Centre, Left, Right). But I don't watch Benfica, so don't know much about him.Uhh, what? The guy’s a winger.
Obviously, McT is not a starter and is a useful squad player. When we are chasing game he could be the hybrid of 8 and 10 to create chaos on the opponent half. His finishing is good for a midfielder which was proven last season. His basic midfield play is average and good enough for a squad player.
Look, he is not the starting midfielder, we should get better midfielders as the first 11, no doubts. The point is he is a useful players and is worth more than 20 mil. We will need him along the season. We should only sell if we get reasonable offer in the 25-30 mil range.
David Neres = AM. Not good news for those wanting to sell McTominay.
Quite clearly a pseudo "box to box" midfielder on a shit team. He's not going to contribute anything to general play but can be useful for scrappy teams as box threat from midfield. Difficult to value that though because the rest of the time he's not scoring he's mostly a net negative. I mean the below is just pathetic. He's not even useful as a squad player for us, he's basically a good "chuck of the dice" late in chaotic games, but if we want to elevate as a team/club then our #1 option for getting another goal later in games shouldn't be "let's turn this into chaos and see if Scott can bag one".
No one is paying more than £20m for McTomminey, that much is sadly evident. In his ‘banner’ season he only managed 7 goals in the Premiership, never remotely looked like getting even that many before and no saying he will even match that this season.
What is that? Never seen anything like this before.
Very good point and a very important factor when talking about the Manchester United midfield. Some posters on here compare our players only to other players that play for us and derive their quality based on that. But that is very flawed in my eyes. Hence why I am so in favor in adding somebody who is very good in the defensive aspects of the game. We've seen people celebrate Amrabat for pretty standard stuff - he simply looked capable in comparison to last years Casemiro edition (that sucked), to Mctominay (...), to Eriksen (who is a defensive non-factor at this stage), to Mainoo (who is decent but not extraordinare (yet?) ) and to Bruno - an attacking midfielder who is very busy but still not crazy productive in terms of defensive aspects. Stats allow us to compare our players to players from different teams - not against our own ones. Especially as long as we know that our bunch hasn't been able to form a really capable midfield unit since I don't know how many years (a few short periods during the Matic-Pogba-Herrera times or McFred aside)I do agree that if you take out the goals, McTominay's all-round game was better when playing deeper than he is at #10.
However even then it ended up with Fred having to do far more than he should have to compensate for Scott's deficiencies. Scott, despite the narrative, has never been a particularly hard worker. He has had individual games where he's been an absolute workhorse, but over the course of a season his workrate is no better than your average central midfielder in the PL. It's just that he was being compared to Pogba and Matic (both well below average in workrate) that he became a 'hard worker' in peoples eyes, and comparable to Fred despite the Brazilian actually doing far, far more work both defensively and on the ball.
But he’s not good enough in the position you just described in order for a team to basically build around him and give him a “free” role. He’s not some 15-20 goals a year type player. He hit his career high with just 10 last year.I think you've just highlighted why his best position would be in a free role as a goal scoring midfielder mate. He is indeed shit in central midfield, I'd agree.
What is that? Never seen anything like this before.
In ideal scenario, yes. But we need to have plan B. This is the reality!I’d much rather we just learned to play fluid attacking football as a team. Relying on technically poor squad players to come on and create chaos because we have to chase games is exactly what we should be moving away from, and as such McTominay should be moved on.
Did you have a pint and a pie while you were dreaming as well?Lads, don’t blame me but had a dream last night, Mctominay scored v Brighton and he stays with us.
He sounds like a Porno star!Just want people to remember that when they say he works hard and gets stuck in. He doesn’t do shit if he’s not in the box.
If we win then I don’t care. Three points are more important.Lads, don’t blame me but had a dream last night, Mctominay scored v Brighton and he stays with us.
Preach.We have been deprived of serious quality in midfield for such a long time that people have forgotten what a proper midfielder looks like.
We play with 10 men when he is on the pitch. We will never move forward as a team with him. Not even as an impact sub. We need to have backup players who can contribute in the same way the first teamers do.
He would have been shipped off a lot earlier if he wasn’t an academy player.
we’d rather sell…Much like Lindelof, Malacia, Casemiro, Eriksen and Sancho we’ll see McTominay moved on next summer
United would be selling him seeing as they’ll activate his extra year, they wouldn’t be turning down offers this summer if they were going to let him leave on a free next summer and I think of that group only Eriksen would be out of contract next summer.we’d rather sell…
I think some of these journos have become overly focused on their image rather than putting in the hard yards. Napoli have (admittedly according to Transfermarket) dropped 75m euros this summer on neres, the tornino cb and a real madrid cb whilst incomings are barely over 10m euros. Osimhen isn’t going to stay and play with Lukaku.James Horncastle said on the Totally European pod that he can't see Napoli selling Osimhen, which is basically their main bulk of transfer budget. As a result, he thinks Lukaku will be the only deal they will look to do without selling Osimhen. However, if they can shift him, Gilmour and McTominay could go there but would all come down to timings.
But he’s not good enough in the position you just described in order for a team to basically build around him and give him a “free” role. He’s not some 15-20 goals a year type player. He hit his career high with just 10 last year.
I think some of these journos have become overly focused on their image rather than putting in the hard yards. Napoli have (admittedly according to Transfermarket) dropped 75m euros this summer on neres, the tornino cb and a real madrid cb whilst incomings are barely over 10m euros. Osimhen isn’t going to stay and play with Lukaku.
That's Like the opposite of morning woodLads, don’t blame me but had a dream last night, Mctominay scored v Brighton and he stays with us.
I don't know why Fulham would want McTominay anyway. They had exactly the same average possession as United last season (slightly more of the ball than there opponents) and it's clear he's not good enough or comfortable enough receiving the ball to play in midfield, and aside from being a decent finisher he's no #10 or second-striker either.
His only real fit IMO would be in a B2B role in a team that has low possession like a Palace or Forest, he's not going to be receiving the ball regularly enough that his overall ability becomes the level of problem it has at United, and he can both be a physical presence in midfield and chip in with some vital goals.
He probably would be for some team.
For the record I said it was his best position. As in the position you would get the best out of him.
As we seen last season, which was probably the first season he was played fairly consistently in a more attacking role.
Quite clearly a pseudo "box to box" midfielder on a shit team. He's not going to contribute anything to general play but can be useful for scrappy teams as box threat from midfield. Difficult to value that though because the rest of the time he's not scoring he's mostly a net negative. I mean the below is just pathetic. He's not even useful as a squad player for us, he's basically a good "chuck of the dice" late in chaotic games, but if we want to elevate as a team/club then our #1 option for getting another goal later in games shouldn't be "let's turn this into chaos and see if Scott can bag one".
Sure, but the initial discussion started from people asking why he's not worth 30m or whatever while others arguing he is. My point is a player with that niche of a role and going into his final year on a contract will be hard pressed to get teams to stump up a solid fee for him.