Too early to say?What can you say
ProbablyToo early to say?
For real?He thinks it's been orchestrated by PSG in the midst of his trial against them to get his unpaid wages. It's a pretty insane situation.
In Sweden?Its all very wierd. What in the world did he do here in Sweden during season. In a night club for one night only. Photografed by mobile phones out walking. This never happends here
Yep, even if he turns out to be completely innocent, that claim by him is pretty insane in itselfHe thinks it's been orchestrated by PSG in the midst of his trial against them to get his unpaid wages. It's a pretty insane situation.
Was wondering who’d say it first. My money was on you or rimmyHe's a good player so he can't have done that and if he did it was probably just role play.
Women? That is overated for sure.In Sweden?
Idk, the women maybe
Each to their ownWomen? That is overated for sure.
The one in norway is clearly ahead. IMO.Each to their own
He was dating/seeing a Swedish woman over the summer, he might have been to Stockholm back then, enjoyed the privacy this nightclub offers (exclusive list, no phones) and wanted to get away from Madrid. I guess he was hoping it would all be hush hush, considering the noises coming from his clan.Its all very wierd. What in the world did he do here in Sweden during season. In a night club for one night only. Photografed by mobile phones out walking. This never happends here
In Sweden?
Idk, the women maybe
Women? That is overated for sure.
Maybe let's not discuss Swedish women in such a grim thread, yeah?Each to their own
You have to be insane to think the two cases are similar.Will be treated differently to Greenwood due to the lack of social media involved.
Much like Antony & so will be given chances.
I mean that’s what a suspect is?According to Swedish media they claim that the police is treating him as a suspect based on reasonable suspicion.
And it is telling that we can absolutely imagine PSG doing something like this.Yep, even if he turns out to be completely innocent, that claim by him is pretty insane in itself
No worries! More of a chat for the gen forumYa apologies @Rooney in Paris
@Rooney in Paris This. Sorry!Ya apologies @Rooney in Paris
Shouldn’t the police clarify?The biggest newspaper in Sweden, Aftonbladet, write that they have sources that say Mbappe is the perpetrator.
The second biggest, Expressen, just have him as a resonable suspect.
For all his flaws Ronaldo already won a BdO before joining Madrid at 25."Following in Ronaldo's footsteps" taken too far..
Don’t know how a newspaper can declare someone as the perpetrator before police have even investigated.The biggest newspaper in Sweden, Aftonbladet, write that they have sources that say Mbappe is the perpetrator.
The second biggest, Expressen, just have him as a resonable suspect.
Framing it as 'orchestrated by psg' provokes tin-foil hat conspiratorial warnings which infer guilt.He thinks it's been orchestrated by PSG in the midst of his trial against them to get his unpaid wages. It's a pretty insane situation.
The biggest newspaper in Sweden, Aftonbladet, write that they have sources that say Mbappe is the suspected perpetrator.
The second biggest, Expressen, just have him as a resonable suspect.
Shouldn’t the police clarify?
What is the discrepancy, is it something within Swedish law?Don’t know how a newspaper can declare someone as the perpetrator before police have even investigated.
They wrote ''utpekad gärningsman'' which is designated (I think? Pointed out) perpitrator. Their source bascially mean that the alleged victim say Mbappe was the one that did it. Not that the rape is real and Mbappe is guilty, but that they have a source that say that the person that claim to have been raped claims that Mbappe was the one that raped her.Don’t know how a newspaper can declare someone as the perpetrator before police have even investigated.
Perhaps not but when then accused is publicly named then it’s fair to discuss reasonably. When it’s arguably the biggest name in football it will certainly be discussed.Topics like these generally don’t lead to constructive discussion online especially when there is a scarcity of facts.