jamesjimmybyrondean
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2019
- Messages
- 7,472
His performance threads always have the least comments because he never really stands out (good or bad)
First few games he looked a bit of a leader and an aerial presence (particularly in attack). More recently he seems to have gone into his shell and is just kind of there doing ok but not great.His performance threads always have the least comments because he never really stands out (good or bad)
There’s no reason to think he can’t be a solid player for us - despite being a bit underwhelming so far he’s only 25. There was a moment last night which summed up the difference in mindsets between him and Maguire which I think causes issues down that side (plus Max not being a WB). Isak played that really flat pass through and Maguire could have just cleared it and you can see De Ligt pointing and waiting but Maguire backs off and allows the Newcastle player in. Eventually Maguire wins the tackle and you see De Ligt standing over him asking why he didn’t just clear it. I’m not sure either mindset is ‘better’ but there’s a real disconnect in how front footed one wants to be versus the other and I think it will keep causing problems.I hate that we are the last stop on his big club tour as no one else will be stupid enough to take him of our hands. He is here for 4 more seasons after this one, FOUR MORE SEASONS. Ridiculously stupid signing on hefty wages.
His performance threads always have the least comments because he never really stands out (good or bad)
It's more that the things I think people thought he would excel at - the physical side of defending i.e. tackling and aerial challenges he's proven pretty average. If you compare him to the best CB in his kind of role in the league, someone aggressive who wants to step out and be physical, which is Konate, he looks very weak. De Ligt wins 62% of headers and 66% of tackles, Konate wins 90% of headers and 75% of tackles. If you are going to be relatively safe/limited in passing and aren't rapid, you need to be elite in those areas. Think of Burn, a big lump who is limited, he wins 55% of tackles which is poor but basically never loses any headers. We should not be having so many issues with crosses with De Ligt and Maguire in the defence regardless of who the other CB is.i'm quite suprised by these latest comments. It's hard to stand out defensively when your defending partners are so weak the opponent is targeting them. Why would he leave his position to make a interception just so some random people on the internet have better stats of him. Sure, if his numbers were so low when he has much more to do, your point would be valid.
He's nowhere near the top of the list of issues. He's decent, not sure there's any reason for the outrage.I hate that we are the last stop on his big club tour as no one else will be stupid enough to take him of our hands. He is here for 4 more seasons after this one, FOUR MORE SEASONS. Ridiculously stupid signing on hefty wages.
He's never been a real tackler though, if you need to tackle, you're already too late in my opinion. He's always been more of a intercepter.It's more that the things I think people thought he would excel at - the physical side of defending i.e. tackling and aerial challenges he's proven pretty average. If you compare him to the best CB in his kind of role in the league, someone aggressive who wants to step out and be physical, which is Konate, he looks very weak. De Ligt wins 62% of headers and 66% of tackles, Konate wins 90% of headers and 75% of tackles. If you are going to be relatively safe/limited in passing and aren't rapid, you need to be elite in those areas. Think of Burn, a big lump who is limited, he wins 55% of tackles which is poor but basically never loses any headers. We should not be having so many issues with crosses with De Ligt and Maguire in the defence regardless of who the other CB is.
I think he can play in the middle of the three, but on the flank he's just not in the game. If you start the same three as last night, he should go central as his passing range just kills that right side and Maguire is much better on the ball than him.
Please tell me you haven't based this take off the Maldini quote which has been completely misused? Of course you need to tackle in football, as a CB you will contest most balls that go into the striker if you are picking them up. You choice is basically to either tackle or drop off and his role isn't to drop off.He's never been a real tackler though, if you need to tackle, you're already too late in my opinion. He's always been more of a intercepter.
He’s a very standard/average level player. In pretty much all facets.
It’s so strange how he was this prodigy who captained Ajax so young, and then went on to be so… ordinary.
Idk, he seems pretty mediocre. What are his strengths exactly? I struggle to think of anything he does well. Not a good passer, we're conceding tons of aerial goals with him out there, gets worked by the likes of Porto"s striker physically, a bit slow and lethargic.... What are his strengths?i'm quite suprised by these latest comments. It's hard to stand out defensively when your defending partners are so weak the opponent is targeting them. Why would he leave his position to make a interception just so some random people on the internet have better stats of him. Sure, if his numbers were so low when he has much more to do, your point would be valid.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with the signing. Plenty of other things to complain about.He doesn't bring any stand out qualities to the 3-4-3 formation. Was never good use of funds in the summer.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with the signing. Plenty of other things to complain about.
Agreed. He has been pretty decent for 38m odd. The same people will say give Maguire contract extension. I don't think we should take them seriously.There's absolutely nothing wrong with the signing. Plenty of other things to complain about.
I presume de Ligt was comfortable in a back 3 before this?Just another victim of the circus of Man United sadly. Ten Hag wanted him, gets sacked and now he's playing in a back three. Hasnt had time to settle in and not going to considering every game seems like a struggle for every one of our players.
Yeah I remember Scholes and others getting abuse for saying what some of us were thinking. It made little sense apart from adding depth. The money should have been spent improving the attack given our obvious lack of goals. Alternatively we could have had Milenkovic for £12m.One of the biggest issues we have is a lack of pace in our defence, why we chose to buy such a slow CB is beyond me. Scholes said it on Overlap the fans we should be buying to upgrade, he's not an upgrade he's on a level playing field ad Maguire and Co.
If anything he's worse because he's horrific Positionally on crosses.
I presume de Ligt was comfortable in a back 3 before this?
no i'm not. If you need to tackle it means the attacker is out of your normal reach. If your man marking or positioning is on point, you should be able to intercept/block instead of tackling. Unless of course you need to clean up the mess of someone elses mistake.Please tell me you haven't based this take off the Maldini quote which has been completely misused? Of course you need to tackle in football, as a CB you will contest most balls that go into the striker if you are picking them up. You choice is basically to either tackle or drop off and his role isn't to drop off.