What's PL experience to do with it?
Keep your pants on both those claims are about Darmian smartass
I'll make it clear to you
Darmian >= Coleman >>> Valencia >>> Clyne
Wait so would you take him over Debuchy or not, just you edited that part out so fast I'm not sure.Hahaha. Surely a wind-up.
From what I've seen of Darmian, he's a good player and certainly fills a massive weakness in your team at right back. He's on a similar level to Clyne but with greater international experience. He won't be as good as some people on here expect but that's because as with every signing he's being built to be 'the next Maldini/Zambrotta'. Lower your expectations a bit. He's a solid RB who fills a gap, not a world beater.
Got to do with iiiiit,What's PL experience to do with it?
Wait so would you take him over Debuchy or not, just you edited that part out so fast I'm not sure.
To be fair he has got what 4 years on Debuchy, I agree it's not gunna set our team alight but I was worried we were gunna neglect the right back spot so it's decent to bring someone in.No I wouldn't and have watched a decent amount of both. It is close though. Took it out because I didn't want to come across like a WUM. At the end of the day, you've got yourself a right back close to the quality of Debuchy/Sagna. RB is your weakest defensive position IMO, it's a good signing.
To be fair before we signed him Kagawa was among the best players.
A Southamtpon side that boasted a better defense than ours all season and yet statistically Valencia performed better defensively than Clyne. We may be arguing the same point that stats aren't everything.
Better cross Ramos and Otamendi off the CB listAgain he has no PL experience
To be fair he has got what 4 years on Debuchy, I agree it's not gunna set our team alight but I was worried we were gunna neglect the right back spot so it's decent to bring someone in.
All opinions are memory based, wtf? Stats are about AS useful as highlights, I'd argue, because both can give a misleading picture. Actually watching someone play a decent amount of times trumps stats almost every time.
I feel he has the potential to be a world beater working under LVGYes. He fits Van Gaals system due to his attacking contributions which are definitely good for a full back. He will give you a little more potency in the 'easier' games which were your downfall this season and a little more solidity. Not a world beater though but I guess there's nothing better on the market at right back.
I feel he has the potential to be a world beater working under LVG
Example:
Guy A: Valencia has 93% passing!
Guy B: Valencia has 93% passing, 800 backwards, 400 forward and with a forward succesion rate of 76%.
If so, hopefully he becomes one within the next season or two so Barca can take him as a Dani Alves replacement before he does too much damage for United!
If so, hopefully he becomes one within the next season or two so Barca can take him as a Dani Alves replacement before he does too much damage for United!
Bellerin.
Yeah as people totally do not have selective memories and bias their opinions by multiple reasons.
Stats are facts. Its utterly stupid to call them "as useful as highlights".
The problem is most people judge a player on a minimum amount of obvious stats. But if you look at all the stats provided, then theres 0% to argue about.
Example
Guy A: Valencia has 93% passing!
Guy B: Valencia has 93% passing, 800 backwards, 400 forward and with a forward succesion rate of 76%.
Do you see the difference? Guy A is your highlight guy and practically everyone who says stats are useless/biased/blablabla
Yeah as people totally do not have selective memories and bias their opinions by multiple reasons.
Stats are facts. Its utterly stupid to call them "as useful as highlights".
The problem is most people judge a player on a minimum amount of obvious stats. But if you look at all the stats provided, then theres 0% to argue about.
Example:
Guy A: Valencia has 93% passing!
Guy B: Valencia has 93% passing, 800 backwards, 400 forward and with a forward succesion rate of 76%.
Do you see the difference? Guy A is your highlight guy and practically everyone who says stats are useless/biased/blablabla
Give it a few years.Nice one.
Not going to happen though. He's already responded to those rumours. I genuinely don't think he likes Barcelona.
Indeed. The incredible level of defending and attacking in Premier League. I think he will consider cutting his career short once he witnesses the magic of Walters, Agbonlahor and Vardy.
Your guy B isn't smarter than the A guy because, Valencia played a lot more passes in the opposition half which explain the backward passes, the style of the teams play a part in where the passes are made, also Valencia played more but shorter passes in less games.
I mean the obvious candidates are all gone unless we end up signing Coleman that is (but Everton will skin us on that one)
I was giving a fictional example, those stats aren't accurate i simply gave an example lol.
Nice one.
Not going to happen though. He's already responded to those rumours. I genuinely don't think he likes Barcelona.
8 million + bonus, it would be a great deal considering the quality of the player, the age, the last season performances (47 games played)
Nice one.
Not going to happen though. He's already responded to those rumours. I genuinely don't think he likes Barcelona.
Darmian's a better actor.I am slightly put off by the fact that he looks like Shia Labeouf.
Nice one.
Not going to happen though. He's already responded to those rumours. I genuinely don't think he likes Barcelona.
Could imagine him on the phone to Woody:I am slightly put off by the fact that he looks like Shia Labeouf.