Member 109952
Guest
My theory on this transfer is it was ass covering from Murtough and co after they'd fecked up so bad the previous year chasing De Jong until late August. No matter what they wanted to make a notable signing early in the window so it looked well planned. They probably told Ten Hag that Mount was available "for a good price" or something and so he thought it would be a good pick up (which it would be for ~£30m). Then the price just kept going up and up and instead of walking away they said "feck it!", bought him anyway, and then went on summer hols thinking job done.
Mount seems is a solid pro but it's such a terrible signing on every level. Even with everyone fit he doesn't make the first 11. All that money on completely the wrong profile of player and even worse he's years past his best form and increasingly injury prone. Make it make sense.
My opinion is that Ten Haag watched him in the Eeredivisie and decided he was good, like pretty much all the other players he's decided to sign.
There's no way anyone could've watched Mount for England and decided he was worth anywhere near what we paid. Even for Chelsea whenever I watched them (around 10 times) he never stood out, people point out his assists and goals - the former being boosted by a lot of corners to the likes of Zouma and Rudiger and the later by runs into the box, spaces that Bruno occupies. We seem to sign players with no actual context of what we're signing. At this point I genuinely think I'd do a better job than whatever our scouting team is doing.