Mason Greenwood (Please post respectfully)

Do you want Mason Greenwood to return next year ?


  • Total voters
    881
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Certainly if we do choose to banish him I hope our academy uses his story as an example of wasting talent and opportunities

The club minded him so carefully as well I can remember he wasn't allowed to do interviews, almost shielded.

Wonder where he'd go if we do get rid? I keep thinking City would but surely not?!
The rumours are of interest from a couple of Italian clubs, I believe.
 
It’s not really how it works. Let’s say you worked as a manager at S&P 500 company and there’s clear evidence of your wrongdoings. Will you get another managerial job at S&P 500 company a year after that?

Depends if you are good at your job, S&P 500 companies care about profits, look at Vince Mcmahon right now he had a sexual scandal fairly recently melted into the background until the multi billion dollar deal was in place now he is back as strong as ever maybe even stronger than before, these companies don't have morals when it comes to making money
 
That could work, but it would also need to be accompanied by some sort of PR campaign involving Greenwood issuing some sort of public apology.

I think that's highly unlikely because he's never gonna admit he abused or raped her in public.
 
What everyone needs to understand that this needs to be handled very carefully and acknowledgement would legally probably be idiotic. Your publicly admitting guilt.
I think any sort of PR campaign would be very carefully handled by United's legal and communications teams. Any interview given on the topic would be pre-scripted with every word carefully pored over.
 
What everyone needs to understand that this needs to be handled very carefully and acknowledgement would legally probably be idiotic. Your publicly admitting guilt. The courts have ruled this a no case. For me he plays. There can be a public statement by both of them with their families to clear the air other than that we can send them to re education camp and fire the baby into social care. If United want him to stay its an easy fix but i for one will not jumping on the moral social media taliban high horse having heard a edit version of a recording. We have had Ronaldo in the team, called for approaches for Benzema , Hakimi, Neymar all who have been accused of worse so commercial interests? really are a concern. We have had a player playing a full season in the premier league and seen no commercial adversity place on their club or him. We have had a player done for drink driving this year never missed a match and the horrific results of those incidents have visited my door. My call is how much does a young person need punished he has missed 18 months of his career. Before anyone jump down my throat I have never judged anyone from a short recording. I have seen 100's of recordings to glee evidence from and only the full circumstances can ever be judged when the lead up to and the aftermath any incident is known in fact. However if we are going down the hand them high social media route we should have started with Ronaldo's return and maybe Rooney before hand. Greenwood is a product of our academy which may say more about United the last 10 years than anything.

I believe MG was compensated his entire (or most of) his wages during his time away.
 
I guess all those that have voted ‘no’ also think that prisoners should not be allowed to work when released from prison. In fact… no… all people that have been arrested (and had charges dropped) should have no future either?
I would argue that most prisoners are not potential role models for millions of kids.
 
From a footballing point of view he should go abroad on loan. He hasn’t played a single minute since January 2022.

The uncomfortable question of whether he should play for us again can be put back until next year. ETH should not have to be dealing with this so early into his job.
 
You have to ask yourself would you be able to cheer him on? Celebrate with him? Chant his name? The answer for me is no.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cheimoon
For no solid reason honestly.

The topic was discussed on other forums/platforms and people lived.
Not saying it should be off limits either, but it’s hyperbolic & truth-bereft posts like the one to which I commented which help derail threads in here.
 
Are these some of the worst justifications ever made, for the sole purpose of a football team potentially being better at playing football?

I think this has to be it. This is the pinnacle. Anything is possible from here onwards.

It is. No doubt about it.
 
You have to ask yourself would you be able to cheer him on? Celebrate with him? Chant his name? The answer for me is no.

Whether we think it appropriate or not, the sentiment of not being able to cheer him on would fade once he scores a few goals.
 
I do find it a little amusing that there are some who fret about the club's debt repayments and claim it's ruining the club (hence the twerking for Qatar), yet some of the very same people are on this thread casually calling for the club to throw away a ~£120m asset (4 years of debt repayments!)

All I can say is thank God they aren't in positions of power over the club!
 
Really surprised that it's so close. People are putting football before morals. Something we laugh at our rivals for.
It's widely known United fans don't talk about Giggs anymore due to what came out despite his legend status. Now people are willing to cheer Greenwood on for the next ten years despite what we know. All for a couple of goals. Personally couldn't stomach him wearing the shirt again. He deserves help, but don't forget he had more help than the majority of people get and the majority of people don't do what he did. We should move on.
 
As someone who specialises in employment law there is a rarely used legal ground for the club to dismiss him. If they can't get him on breach of contract for bringing the club into disrepute they can dismiss on SOSR or Some Other Substantial Reason. There's a big difference between being found not guilty in a court of law and the case being unable to proceed due to lack of evidence. The overwhelming fall out/noise as a result of him returning to the team from within and outside the club would technically render his position untenable plus sponsors potentially jumping ship and the share price affected.

On a person level if he returns I'm done with the club. My 50 year plus support is already hanging by a thread over Qatar.

Thanks for your legal perspective. It’s good that we can at least legally let him go without paying some sort of compensation.

Regarding his return, as an overseas fan, I believe that there is enough societal voice (women’s groups, activists, United’ own women’s team and many more) in the UK, who will never allow this to happen. So I’m confident that the club will, and has to, do the right thing.

On Qatar, I’m with you.
 
Depends if you are good at your job, S&P 500 companies care about profits, look at Vince Mcmahon right now he had a sexual scandal fairly recently melted into the background until the multi billion dollar deal was in place now he is back as strong as ever maybe even stronger than before, these companies don't have morals when it comes to making money
There are ton of examples of many great careers ending after the public image is ruined. Some of the examples in the thread are also crazy. Mason is not that good.

I’m not saying he should not play football ever again. Just not at United.
 
Wonderful talent with the world at his feet. But in this modern age, despite being technically innocent, I fear he and the club will get castigated should he return. The clips on social media won’t be forgotten. What a waste but we have to move on and move him on to presumably another country for a new start.
 
As someone who specialises in employment law there is a rarely used legal ground for the club to dismiss him. If they can't get him on breach of contract for bringing the club into disrepute they can dismiss on SOSR or Some Other Substantial Reason. There's a big difference between being found not guilty in a court of law and the case being unable to proceed due to lack of evidence. The overwhelming fall out/noise as a result of him returning to the team from within and outside the club would technically render his position untenable plus sponsors potentially jumping ship and the share price affected.

On a person level if he returns I'm done with the club. My 50 year plus support is already hanging by a thread over Qatar.

I'd have thought the fact that he's been out of the fold for so many months would be grounds enough to sell him. From a footballing perspective, they could claim he's lost too much time in development and is now surplus to requirements.
 
I do find it a little amusing that there are some who fret about the club's debt repayments and claim it's ruining the club (hence the twerking for Qatar), yet some of the very same people are on this thread casually calling for the club to throw away a ~£120m asset (4 years of debt repayments!)

All I can say is thank God they aren't in positions of power over the club!

How much was this asset worth before he stopped training and playing for a year and half?
 
I do find it a little amusing that there are some who fret about the club's debt repayments and claim it's ruining the club (hence the twerking for Qatar), yet some of the very same people are on this thread casually calling for the club to throw away a ~£120m asset (4 years of debt repayments!)

All I can say is thank God they aren't in positions of power over the club!

I thank god everyday for his debt considerations in the form of a domestic abuse asset in the context of a football club being better. Some say you can see god in the sunshine but I see him in the breakdowns of asset management and debt repayments.That's where he shines.
 
I do find it a little amusing that there are some who fret about the club's debt repayments and claim it's ruining the club (hence the twerking for Qatar), yet some of the very same people are on this thread casually calling for the club to throw away a ~£120m asset (4 years of debt repayments!)

All I can say is thank God they aren't in positions of power over the club!
Where have you got this valuation from?
 
If I've learned anything in this life it's that some humans are despicable and some of them play football. Greenwood is probably not worse than some other players we cheer on every week. Unfortunately for him he was caught red handed, and it's impossible for me to ever unhear what I heard.

A wasted talent.
 
His wife or girlfriend has forgiven him, their parents have forgiven him, his church must have forgiven him, the case has been dropped, who am I to stop him from enjoying what he does best. The guy is free to play his football in Manchester United.
I'd love to see him play for united again, wonderful talent.

He has made mistakes but common, this guy will grow up and become a better human being, give the boy a chance.
 
Last edited:
That could work, but it would also need to be accompanied by some sort of PR campaign involving Greenwood issuing some sort of public apology.
I know that we all would like to see an apology. The issue is that from legal perspective it is not that easy and any lawyer will not allow him to do that due to potential repercussions. Any public apology would be drafted in a way that would not address directly the situation in question.

The club can however be active in a way where they can help a young person to turn the corner and at the same time establish very strict rules for the relationship between the club and the player. I also hope that Mason’s situation actually changed the policy around the club and they are taking preventive actions for similar situations to never take place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cheimoon
Unless you English guys don't believe in your own justice system, I don't see why he can't come back. Our best right side player. Our best finisher. Why not?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I know that we all would like to see an apology. The issue is that from legal perspective it is not that easy and any lawyer will not allow him to do that due to potential repercussions. Any public apology would be drafted in a way that would not address directly the situation in question.

The club can however be active in a way where they can help a young person to turn the corner and at the same time establish very strict rules for the relationship between the club and the player. I also hope that Mason’s situation actually changed the policy around the club and they are taking preventive actions for similar situations to never take place.

Of course. It would have to be carefully scripted and legally scrutinized before proceeding.
 
It’d be interesting to know how many of the people that have voted yes have daughters of their own.
 
Even as someone who voted yes, there have been some dreadful takes in this thread. Sort yourselves out.
 
Hard no for me. Surprised the poll is so close to be honest, I expected a landslide.
 
I'd be interested in knowing the views that do want him back - are you influenced by us having struggled through half a season with sick note Tony and ineffective WW

If we sign say Harry Kane, would you still want MG back?

I think the fact he’s just a generational talent alone counts the most. I mean if he was Marcus at your local Sunday league he wouldn’t have the privilege.

Also on a player level when you look at the performance of Jadon Sancho who cost us £75m. You get a scale of how good MG actually was.
 
People deserve an opportunity to redeem themselves. That's a good principle in my view.

Of course there's nothing simple about this whole scenario. But one thing that never sits well with me is the idea that Greenwood should not be allowed resume his career at Manchester United because it would reflect badly on the club. That idea that we think that we or our club or football in general represents high moral principles that Greenwood has fallen below and so he should be thrown aside... If anyone is projecting high moral values on any element of professional football then they need to take a step back and consider what they're watching each week.

Greenwood should be given a second chance and we should hold the football industry to higher standards not just individuals who make mistakes.
 
I voted yes on the basis that his Girlfriend got pregnant with his child after all this broke out. If he was such a monster why would she have anything more to do with him.

Also, reports of her using his card to buy herself gifts during this whole ordeal makes it look like a total circus.
So since accusing him of rape and battery she has continued to meet up and chat, used his credit card to buy herself gifts then to top it off, gets pregnant with his child. Hilarious.

The whole thing comes across as a bit of a hoax.
a hoax !!! are you joking ?
 
I’ve tough my kids about respect based on his recordings. Don’t want him anywhere near United.
 
Are we in possession of the facts yet so to form a properly informed opinion?

On footballing grounds it's easy to say, but there's so much more to it than that. If he's not totally innocent then I can't see how that doesn't make it impossible to reintegrate him into the squad and have a happy camp.
 
Of course. It would have to be carefully scripted and legally scrutinized before proceeding.
Indeed, it's perfectly possible to apologize for something with out actually saying what it is you're apologizing for, the meaning is clear but you aren't actually saying it, that's basically what politicians do to get away with everything
 
Status
Not open for further replies.