I haven't voted and I haven't really given the situation much thought since MG got suspended, but I wonder how many of the people who voted no had no problem with CR7 "coming home" to us.
Mason Greenwood (Please post respectfully)
- Thread starter Raoul
- Start date
- Status
Does that apply to life in general or just United-related stuff? Because most people would struggle to uphold that.
I did not hear the audio. From what I‘ve heard, he is back with the woman who forgave him and they are having a child.
If the club want to give him a chance, it‘s ok with me
If the club want to give him a chance, it‘s ok with me
Ronny was shagging grannies DDG was a donut FFS
That’s why the thread was closed I presume.
where the feck have you got £120m from ?
Think the club are gonna be looking a lot online over the views of the fans and go with the majority. They won’t want any bad reputation on the club. Don’t know how he’ll cope with rival fans chanting every week about him though.
Not for me it wouldn't. I'd seriously have to consider whether I could continue watching the team. At the moment I don't think I would.
Thin air
Not because he's banned but simply because he lacks the mental capacity? Harsh but fair Raoul, I agree with you.
Bro. There is literally zero evidence to ever say he raped her. I don’t know why that still circulates.
That is a very poor assumption to make. One thing doesn't follow from the other.
He was a developing player who has missed so much football that it cannot not have a negative impact on his development. I'd rather get rid than factor him in preying he's going to get back to his best and finding ourselves short when almost inevitably he doesn't.
I think the decision has been made, they were waiting until the end of the season, or perhaps the sale, before announcing it
Did you listen to the audio? There’s no concrete evidence but there is audio of him saying he will have sex with her if he wants to and her saying no.
I'd feel uncomfortable about us using the money. If we could guarantee that they'd accept it, I'd want us to donate it to charities but they might see it as tainted and reject it. I've seen charities turn down money before when they've felt is come from questionable people/sources.
Ideal scenario might be to invite bids of £0. Definitely don't want him to play for us again.
This thread is shocking , really some of the worst posts I have ever seen on RedCafe.
Didn’t get an answer to this and I’m genuinely curious
I’m so shocked it’s not a landslide in the poll
I'm not even sure some of his team mates, especially those with daughters themselves, would want him back.
They would have seen the audio and pictures too. No self respecting man could look at him the same way again.
They would have seen the audio and pictures too. No self respecting man could look at him the same way again.
Yes but with a number of caveats and conditions. For one and if/when the club permits, the player to speak to show actual regret and contrition; and donate a years worth of salary and percentage moving forward to various charities chosen by the club with a focus on women and other vulnerable groups.
I can appreciate for many that these sort of actions by him or the club will never be good enough nor will it matter to the sponsors and parties with a vested interest in the club. Sadly, money will dictate how this will ultimately end.
I can appreciate for many that these sort of actions by him or the club will never be good enough nor will it matter to the sponsors and parties with a vested interest in the club. Sadly, money will dictate how this will ultimately end.
Opposition fans were singing those types of chants at Ronaldo every week last season. It wasn't something that the club or the player found difficult to cope with.
I don’t think we’ll have him back. Don’t think the woman team will be comfortable with him back either.
Add a see results option please.
I think he will be sold because the matter is too divisive.
That way he can pursue his career elsewhere and the club can redeem their investment.
That way he can pursue his career elsewhere and the club can redeem their investment.
Ronaldos a lot older though. Could affect a young player.
Young people make mistakes, especially those such as footballers who aren't in touch with the real world. If the whole thing was a fact he was being convicted with then its too big a mistake to forgive and would learn the hard way behind bars. But because this is not the case I feel he does deserve a second chance. Thank God I had people gave me 2nd chances when my life could have went another direction
Voted no, but less so based on my verdict, which is rather insignificant given the distance between me and the truth in all its aspects, and more so based on the PR nightmare handling a continuing collaboration would mean, as I see it.
I'd clearly back the club taking the entire financial hit and ending the contract, or selling to spend the money to charity, with both being useful PR wise, which would be well deserved from my point of view. Yet, I'd also back them asking for a (presumably lowered) transfer fee, since none of this was the fault of anyone at the club other than the player as a private person.
I'd clearly back the club taking the entire financial hit and ending the contract, or selling to spend the money to charity, with both being useful PR wise, which would be well deserved from my point of view. Yet, I'd also back them asking for a (presumably lowered) transfer fee, since none of this was the fault of anyone at the club other than the player as a private person.
why?
I'm pretty sure if a high-profile player gets suspected, nevermind convicted of war crimes or murder, then I'm pretty sure said player would never play at a high-profile club again. Also they aren't being given second chances because everyone thinks they deserve it, but because of the law. Utterly weird comparison and I suspect you will acknowledge that when thinking it a bit more through.
Fans are very fickle though. I’d imagine the majority of people that have voted no on this poll will forget as soon as Mason smashes one in the net.
Greenwood worth £120m 
If the club had any sense they will have been asked for their views, and they will have been given a lot more information than any of us on here have
Boehly would probably pay thatGreenwood worth £120m
It would be much easier for you to vote "yes" if you chose to ignore the audio.
What the feck does this mean? stereotyping a whole country. Get a grip.
Well the last i heard was that greenwood and the lady in question are having a child and will get married in due time. The news might be untrue but they had been living together for months before the case was dropped. In fact that was one of the reasons why the prosecution dropped the case.
We've all heard the tape. Maybe she forgave him, but we don't have to.
There must be more to football than just winning. We can't keep singing songs for someone who did something like that. The poll is shocking to be honest.
There must be more to football than just winning. We can't keep singing songs for someone who did something like that. The poll is shocking to be honest.
Even pigs have standards
Nobody knows the true context of the video or audio clip. They look and sound bad but lots of things do look worse when absent of their true context.
Relationships are incredibly complex and I find it unnerving that so many feel they know exactly what happened and what the context was. As said before, couples regularly engage in all sorts of sexual roleplay and that's a possibility in this instance. We just don't know.
What we do know is that Mason Greenwood was investigated in depth and the Police concluded in the end that he had no case to answer. We are supposed to live in a society governed by laws with police and courts used to enforce them, while we respect and abide by the outcomes decided (even if we disagree sometimes)
I think it's incredibly arrogant and frankly outrageous that so many on here think they are effectively above the law and think the club ought to instead adhere to a trial by social media. Shame on you.
Relationships are incredibly complex and I find it unnerving that so many feel they know exactly what happened and what the context was. As said before, couples regularly engage in all sorts of sexual roleplay and that's a possibility in this instance. We just don't know.
What we do know is that Mason Greenwood was investigated in depth and the Police concluded in the end that he had no case to answer. We are supposed to live in a society governed by laws with police and courts used to enforce them, while we respect and abide by the outcomes decided (even if we disagree sometimes)
I think it's incredibly arrogant and frankly outrageous that so many on here think they are effectively above the law and think the club ought to instead adhere to a trial by social media. Shame on you.
- Status