You show no respect to treat different opinion. I expect more from older poster.
Your ignorance about how domestic violence victims behave is not a good look.
You show no respect to treat different opinion. I expect more from older poster.
So abandoning someone and not giving them a second chance does make sense to you?
He’s obviously not coming back. No matter what is speculated it just simply won’t happen. That part is doneJust get some kind of fee for him . Dont want him back.
So he scored I see, but instead of taking about that, it’s the same old high school bickering going on.
Such a terrible idea to remove the performance thread for this car crash.
Delighted he’s putting up good numbers, I really do think we may get 40+ for him if we play our cards right. He’d be excellent for Atletico.
You could have just said this.I never express it as okay or not okay. I just don’t really care because this circumstance is not normal. In normal circumstances, Greenwood and his girlfriend shouldn’t be together and living together again if his girlfriend is unhappy. But the reality is it’s the opposite of normal circumstances. Rather than wasting our time acting like we know everything what is right and what is wrong, let the club under Sir Jim to make the decision. And that’s where my stand is.
I’m afraid based on your lack of respect calling my post as unrepentant insanity, I think you will only accept one choice. While if the club or Sir Jim somehow making the other choice even if they state the reasons are, you will go berserk and call it as repentant insanity no matter what.
I did.You could have just said this.
The girl’s family and the girl herself don’t seem to take this matter seriously and they are happily to forgive Greenwood. Why should I take this matter seriously if the victim doesn’t care and now living in a house with Greenwood?
I don’t care and I don’t have issue whether he’s going to be part of the squad again or sell him. As long as we don’t do loan again because it’s not benefit us for our FFP if we want to improve our squad.
It would be the same whatever thread it is, when he played shit the other day it was a ghost town in here, he has a good game and the same shit gets repeated.High school? More like nursery school !
The bickering actually ramps up significantly whenever he scores as those who want him hung, drawn and quartered don't like any football related chat in here.
Yes it was clearly a bad idea to remove the Performance thread.
That's not true and you're yet again misrepresenting the discussions here. From what I've seen, posts talking objectively about his performances don't cause the 'bickering'. The last few pages since he played yesterday actually have very few posts about his performance and the ones that are there don't seem to have caused any bickering. The posts that do cause the anti-greenwood posters to push back are the ones like this, which I'm assuming you won't find that surprising:High school? More like nursery school !
The bickering actually ramps up significantly whenever he scores as those who want him hung, drawn and quartered don't like any football related chat in here.
Yes it was clearly a bad idea to remove the Performance thread.
Im so excited for him to come back. So many people here are playing moral judges, but before being moral judges, one must first possess the ability to give people the benefit of the doubt. Especially when he hasn't been convicted of anything illegal. Luckily, you have no influence on the decision.
If there is no verdict issued, then it is such that he is, by definition, innocent. The fact that some attribute a 'we don't really know' approach is precisely why doubt should work in his favor, especially when the police did not believe the evidence was sufficient for a conviction.
This is the core of the discussion regarding Greenwood's return, so we need to address that.
But yes, one can be guilty without being convicted. However, the point remains that knowledge of whether a person is guilty is crucial for a verdict. If a murder cannot be solved due to a lack of concrete 'knowledge,' you can claim the person is guilty, but it's not based on objective findings.
Legally speaking, Greenwood is innocent! Alternatively, we can all individually speculate on what he exactly did - and in that way, attribute guilt to him for actions that would even vary if you ask 10 different people.
Also, the performance posts that DO cause bickering are the ones that run something like: 'absolutely brilliant today, ran things. Better stats than Vinicius - can't wait to see him back at OT.'That's not true and you're yet again misrepresenting the discussions here. From what I've seen, posts talking objectively about his performances don't cause the 'bickering'. The last few pages since he played yesterday actually have very few posts about his performance and the ones that are there don't seem to have caused any bickering. The posts that do cause the anti-greenwood posters to push back are the ones like this, which I'm assuming you won't find that surprising:
It would be the same whatever thread it is, when he played shit the other day it was a ghost town in here, he has a good game and the same shit gets repeated.
Maybe if Qatar had taken overCentre circle.
Saying that you don't care about the crimes he's accused of is pretty disgraceful to be honest.I did.
There are no moral absolutes. You’re one of the staff here, not a judge. You have no right to call my decision as ignorance just because I don’t want to choose either side what‘s right and what’s wrong.Your ignorance about how domestic violence victims behave is not a good look.
That's not true and you're yet again misrepresenting the discussions here. From what I've seen, posts talking objectively about his performances don't cause the 'bickering'. The last few pages since he played yesterday actually have very few posts about his performance and the ones that are there don't seem to have caused any bickering. The posts that do cause the anti-greenwood posters to push back are the ones like this, which I'm assuming you won't find that surprising:
No moral absolutes. So you don't think that attempted rape and domestic assault are absolutely morally wrong?There are no moral absolutes. You’re one of the staff here, not a judge. You have no right to call my decision as ignorance just because I don’t want to choose either side what‘s right and what’s wrong.
There are no moral absolutes. You’re one of the staff here, not a judge. You have no right to call my decision as ignorance just because I don’t want to choose either side what‘s right and what’s wrong.
You told me that I could have just say ‘’I don’t care’’, and now you criticised it. Make up your mind what you want me to say. You just want to argue with me because I prefer not to pick either side. I have stated my reason why I chose not to care. When you posted that post, I doubt you even remember what was my reason, otherwise you wouldn’t call it disgraceful.Saying that you don't care about the crimes he's accused of is pretty disgraceful to be honest.
There are no moral absolutes. You’re one of the staff here, not a judge. You have no right to call my decision as ignorance just because I don’t want to choose either side what‘s right and what’s wrong.
You told me that I could have just say ‘’I don’t care’’, and now you criticised it. Make up your mind what you want me to say. You just want to argue with me because I prefer not to pick either side. I have stated my reason why I chose not to care. When you posted that post, I doubt you even remember what was my reason, otherwise you wouldn’t call it disgraceful.
If you really care, you should spend more time starting partition or some campaign or find idea for Greenwood to be punished and going to jail. Spending your time insulting people who prefer not to pick either side ain’t helping you but only reflecting you as being disrespectful.
No moral absolutes. So you don't think that attempted rape and domestic assault are absolutely morally wrong?
If it’s wrong or definitely wrong then greenwood should have go to jail and the club shouldn’t take their time to release him. This shows how this world works differently than how you imagined and this is why I have the right to choose not to call it right or wrong.One side IS definitely wrong though.
If you really care, you should spend more time starting partition or some campaign
This thread isn't too bad at points, then some newbie tends to come along and put their hot take that's been discussed as nauseam and people against his return can't help but call it out. I don't see how that would be any different in a performance thread, his return discussion and performance is too closely linked.The Performance thread had some bickering but it was generally ok, certainly compared to this mess of a thread anyway
It was too much to moderate 2 threads so it won’t be returningThe Performance thread had some bickering but it was generally ok, certainly compared to this mess of a thread anyway
There are no moral absolutes.
If it’s wrong or definitely wrong then greenwood should have go to jail and the club shouldn’t take
their time to release him.
Perhaps a one man protest against domestic violence.
If it’s wrong or definitely wrong then greenwood should have go to jail and the club shouldn’t take their time to release him. This shows how this world works differently than how you imagined and this is why I have the right to choose not to call it right or wrong.
It was too much to moderate 2 threads so it won’t be returning
Is
There will be more than one protestor, believe me.
I do get that point TBF, still a shame
The discussion of his performances is not objective. It's to praise a probable rapist when he plays well. So no, it's still not a good look for the caf. Not a fecking peep about any context or when he doesn't play well.
Spot onJust thread ban anyone who wants to talk case or wants to discuss bringing him back vs. not bringing him back.
Performance only or threadbanned, instead it’s a permanent car crash at the top of the forum rehashing the same stuff like it’s Groundhog Day for eternity.
There is no need for doubt. We know exactly what sort of unrepentant scumbag he is.
If it’s wrong or definitely wrong then greenwood should have go to jail and the club shouldn’t take their time to release him. This shows how this world works differently than how you imagined and this is why I have the right to choose not to call it right or wrong.
So much neutralityHigh school? More like nursery school !
The bickering actually ramps up significantly whenever he scores as those who want him hung, drawn and quartered don't like any football related chat in here.
Yes it was clearly a bad idea to remove the Performance thread.
No point replying to them anymore, I think they've been banned.If it was right, the club wouldn't have needed to ban him, and send him on loan when he was available to return.
I actually think it's very unlikely he's a rapist and it's not a good look for the Caf to be allowing such libellous accusations (not from you to be clear but others say it all the time).
Not all the performance chat is positive either but yes there is usually more when he plays well than not.