E-mal
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2017
- Messages
- 4,522
He is, but to each their opinionHe's not, though. Foden is streets ahead.
He is, but to each their opinionHe's not, though. Foden is streets ahead.
Never been of the same level of talent though. Foden is generations ahead when it comes to his general play.
I don't "trust you" as you seem clueless as to how criminal domestic violence cases work.
Never been of the same level of talent though. Foden is generations ahead when it comes to his general play.
Not married. Why do people in this thread keep marrying him off?Well said. Young people deserve a second chance in some cases and I believe this is one of those cases given he was not convicted, his wife forgave him, her family apparently forgave him, and it appears he has been good since.
Why not welcome him back on a probationary basis? You screw up again, you are sold to some Saudi team and this could be in his new contract.
Probably because they once posted a photo of themselves holding hands on instagram. That and having a child now, so people just putting 2+2.Not married. Why do people in this thread keep marrying him off?
Abuse manifests in different ways. What you described was physical and verbal abuse.I didn't force my self sexually? I didn't force my self violently for my own benefits.
I'd have negative thoughts, sleep problems such as sleep walking and insomnia where I'd lose my awareness (due to serotonin) and my girlfriend tried to help me as I was loosing my mind out of anger and pain.
Nothing directed to her or lifestyle choices.
Both her and my family knew the 'real me' and knew that this angry 'evil one' was not the real me and that I could change back to the person I once was.
She is still with me now, forgiven me whilst I regret everything I did - changed in to a better man from learning from my mistakes and struggles.
What's interesting is that alot of the negative things I used to do or used to feel actually came from the side effects of the medication I was first diagnosed with aswell!
I don’t think so. They are businessmen. They care about protecting his value as an asset of the club. Nothing more.You're probably not too far off the mark here.
Not married. Why do people in this thread keep marrying him off?
It’s clear to me that many in this thread don’t see domestic abuse and sexual violence as that big of a deal.Id say its PR, legitimizing their reasoning of "if she's forgiven him, who am I to hold a grudge?", with a dash of "whatever happens between a man and his wife is their business" in the hopes that the rest of us can embrace a life of wilful ignorance.
The married error is a bit annoying but actually makes little difference to the general points being made since they are living together with a child
Feck this shit, bring him back. Having Foden tear us apart is heart breaking. Somebody of the same level of talent as Foden.
Really hard to tell given the past two seasons and their respective teams, managers and (most importantly), teammates.Never been of the same level of talent though. Foden is generations ahead when it comes to his general play.
You can use this rethoric to try and level every player. Not saying that what you are saying isn't true, but Greenwood offered very little if he wasn't scoring. Could hold up the ball well, and bring others into play but nowhere near the playmaked, tempo dictater that Foden is.Really hard to tell given the past two seasons and their respective teams, managers and (most importantly), teammates.
Foden plays in a settled team with a very good manager, clear tactics, loads of the ball, surrounded by good players, receives better passes in better situations, etc.
Greenwood isn’t.
It makes a difference geographically. Some posters reside in countries where marital rape is not a crime.
Hadnt actually considered that - I think most realise they werent married when all this blew up though, some assume 'married' because they now have a child and living together in Spain.
The fact is that she (and more importantly for me, her family) accepted the verdict of the club's internal investigation that he is innocent.
Sir Jim said he wants to look at the facts of the internal investigation before making any decision. We know that the club are already speaking to the Greenwood family and I would hope they will also speak to her family again to understand what they want to happen.
Oh, I don't know if that is a fact quite as much as it's an assumption on your part. It is quite a complex situation and you don't have the data to declare facts.
These are the facts according to official statements, up to you if you choose to believe them or not but if this statement isnt true then the family has every opportunity via the club, police, media etc to challenge it.
"The alleged victim's family participated in the process and were given the opportunity to review and correct our factual findings."
As I said, I hope INEOS will follow up with her and her family to ask them what they want to happen at this point.
Was there ever a denial of this? This is one of the foremost reason why lenient view is considered. If he was shite nobody would give a flying f about him. Even SAF tolerated different difficult characters to some extent due to their quality and what they bought to the team (Eric, Keane etc.).At least some people are letting the mask slip and admitting they only give a shit because he's good at football.
Was there ever a denial of this? This is one of the foremost reason why lenient view is considered. If he was shite nobody would give a flying f about him. Even SAF tolerated different difficult characters to some extent due to their quality and what they bought to the team (Eric, Keane etc.).
Was there ever a denial of this? This is one of the foremost reason why lenient view is considered. If he was shite nobody would give a flying f about him. Even SAF tolerated different difficult characters to some extent due to their quality and what they bought to the team (Eric, Keane etc.).
It's our board who has pushed us to this circumstances due to their incompetence. If we are well stacked with quality in the attacking line, I'm sure this Greenwood thread wouldn't have this many pages. He can feck off for all I care.This thread just shows how pathetically desperate we’ve become to supplement our poor quality squad with a player who should never set foot at this club again. I know for a fact that innocence in the eyes of the law means just that and nothing more. It doesn’t take away the abuse that we’ve all heard and seen even if the legal system disregards the evidence.
It is not the same. And it will never be the same. But also across the world what is considered normal is not the same. I'm not condoning what Greenwood did. I don't find it acceptable behavior or norm. But also don't think it should kill him and his career. Second chance, last warning. One more and you are finished. And take it from there.Are you are really comparing Eric & Keane's strong personalities and on-field discipline issues to what Mason Greenwood did?
But it hasn’t killed him or his career. He's playing football and earning a lot of money doing so.It is not the same. And it will never be the same. But also across the world what is considered normal is not the same. I'm not condoning what Greenwood did. I don't find it acceptable behavior or norm. But also don't think it should kill him and his career. Second chance, last warning. One more and you are finished. And take it from there.
Same as I don't get it why he shouldn't receive a second chance here at United. Because of public pressure?But it hasn’t killed him or his career. He's playing football and earning a lot of money doing so.
I just don’t get how people think him no longer playing for United is equal to him not receiving a second chance. He’s received it.
Jesus here we are with yet another newbie rehashing the same tired argument yet againSame as I don't get it why he shouldn't receive a second chance here at United. Because of public pressure?
Because no one deserves a second chance, especially at Utd.Same as I don't get it why he shouldn't receive a second chance here at United. Because of public pressure?
That is not them accepting his innocence as fact. That is them accepting the facts of the investigation. Which we haven't been privy to. An investigation said he didn't commit the alleged crimes, but in a way that left a massive cloud over what did happen. Just to remind you that it said "did not commit the offences in respect of which he was originally charged. That said, as Mason publicly acknowledges today, he has made mistakes'. Innocence isn't mentioned and you'd be the first to point that out if someone else used it and you didn't agree.
Seems like semantics to me but if it makes a difference to you then Id be happy to revise my statement to:
"The fact is that she (and more importantly for me, her family) accepted the verdict of the club's internal investigation that he did not commit the crimes he was charged with."
Happy with that?
Seems like semantics to me but if it makes a difference to you then Id be happy to revise my statement to:
"The fact is that she (and more importantly for me, her family) accepted the verdict of the club's internal investigation that he did not commit the crimes he was charged with."
Happy with that?
Yeh I think it's very hard to take, or trust, anything the families say seriously, when the day after (I think?) it all came out her father came along in support of MG straight away, which we all found very odd because very few fathers of an alleged victim would ever do something like that. But I think it's fairly obvious why when you think about it.Its hard to dismiss it as semantics when you do it at every opportunity.
It's less misleading that way alright. I still think the club statement that leaves a huge elephant in the room. Almost like they couldn't fully exonerate him.
And the family's acceptance is again an assumption. We have no idea what conversations were had or promises that were made.
Yeh I think it's very hard to take, or trust, anything the families say seriously, when the day after (I think?) it all came out her father came along in support of MG straight away, which we all found very odd because very few fathers of an alleged victim would ever do something like that. But I think it's fairly obvious why when you think about it.
Yeh that's true alright I guess.I'd hesitate to speculate because there are so many possibilities. If she was adamant she was staying he'd almost have to support her publicly. So complicated.
I think the problem is it's not. Which makes it worse to a degree.Yeh I think it's very hard to take, or trust, anything the families say seriously, when the day after (I think?) it all came out her father came along in support of MG straight away, which we all found very odd because very few fathers of an alleged victim would ever do something like that. But I think it's fairly obvious why when you think about it.