Kostov
Full Member
What relevance did it have? Firstly he gets into his preferable position apparently while we shift our best winger out of his. Then he gets the minutes Martial doesn't despite being shit, while the other does not have that same opportunity. How is that irrelevant? And even then why in the name of Christ all Mighty did he bring a player planning to play him as a LW while we don't have a single RW? If loosing our best young talent was the price for bringing 29 year old Alexis Sanchez I would have said no to that transfer, for obvious reasons of course.I did. What relevance has that got with anything I said? I acknowledged that Sanchez was shit but that as a new signing of his pedigree there isn’t a manager in the world who wouldn’t have persevered with him for at least a few months. Can you imagine the criticism Mourinho would’ve got for not giving him a chance from this not obsessed with Martial? Truth still remains that as poor as Sanchez was he still played better than Martial from February on. Which gives a clear indication of how useless he was. In the interim period he refuses to sign a contract and makes it known he wants to leave. Why wouldn’t Mourinho then favour players who don’t want to leave?
After the Chelsea game where Martial supposedly played so well, can’t say I remember that way myself but sure, he got injured. During that injury Rashford was the match winner against Liverpool so common sense dictates that he went ahead in the pecking order again. Any chance Martial got after that he was shit until he had a good cameo off the bench against Arsenal and got his chance to start again. And then he was shit again.
You think half of Rashford’s minutes were up front? Maybe we need a double appointment at that optician. You make excuses for Martial having to play in a different position in two games while Rashford has been moved between three positions for two years?
Your last paragraph is utter nonsense. People have eyes and can see work rate on a football pitch. They can also read newspapers when a players agents is telling anyone who will listen that true player wants to leave or cries that he has to change his shirt number. Perhaps you need to ask the question why there is no report of Rashford having a bad attitude. And whether there is a correlation between application and opportunity.
Truth still remains that Alexis was as shit as everybody on the pitch, him running around like headless chicken can not mask the disappointment he was, we expected him to help us in the CL and have an immediate impact. He failed in that. I'm not writing him off, but for what he was brought he failed so far, and questions still remain.
That Chelsea game was the only game Martial played in his best position and we won, having a fairly decent game. Then he got injured and that was that, a combination of Rashford selfishness denied him a goal against Brighton. And Rashford played 20 games as a LW, and 18 as a CF, Martial has 28 as a LW and 9 as a CF. So talk about excuses, but first check your facts, and to add to it Rashford has 5 games as RW and Martial 3.
About that last paragraph being utter nonsense, yet you mention how shit Martial was couple of times. Need I remind you how shit we've been as a team in the same period? Was it only Martial? No it wasn't. Our attack has been shambles and the issue is wider than individual problems.
Also mentioning Rashford, there were also stories coming about his dissatisfaction with the manager, and where there is smoke, there's fire also. If he wasn't English and his competition for a spot at the World Cup wasn't Danny Wellbeck, there would have been a lot more you can bet on it. And need I remind you, none of this attitude problems with Martial were there before, now he is as bad as Balloteli according to some.