ZDwyr
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2014
- Messages
- 7,318
I thought he was decent for Belgium. They were quite poor but IMO he was in their best two or three.
He needs only couple of good games for us for people to say that we won those games just because of him. You would think we never won the game without him in our side. He scored fecking 3 goals all season despite even playing as a striker at times ffs.
Mamy still say we reached the top4 last season only because of him.
Have you even been in Herrera's thread this season? Majority are saying he's had really shit season including his biggest fans(you can include me too there), how can you even say something like that?
I really hate this thread for things like this. Anytime he plays well his team has won the game because of him, maybe because you people think he is better than Messi?
That's because people believe he has the ability to do well for us. Many of us don't have the same opinion about Fellaini.Majority said he had really shit season because he had poor season. But majority people wanted to see him in starting eleven every single game last season. Even in some of our muppet next season starting eleven Herrera is in the list.
That's because people believe he has the ability to do well for us. Many of us don't have the same opinion about Fellaini.
I guess the guy was right saying "too many people busy wanking on herrera" even though he put poor performance every games.
Again, it's very simple:I guess the guy was right saying "too many people busy wanking on herrera" even though he put poor performance every games.
Except majority admitting he was shit last season? yeah, great argument.
Again, it's very simple:
People acknowledge Herrera was bad but they believe he can do much better.
People acknowledge Fellaini was bad and they believe he cannot do much better, this is the best we can hope for and it's not enough.
It's not complicated. You might disagree with their assessment of either player, of course.
You don't get it don't you? Even though the argument is so simple. He was right about people wanking on herrera.
Like i said before majority admitted he was shit which is true. But every week they were keep saying to play Herrera ahead of Fellaini even though in reality he played poor and Fellaini had a better games.
I'd yet to see any opposing fan being bother by us having Herrera. Except that "provoked" Slippy-G stamp.Fellaini won't probably play much under Mourinho, or at least he'll play lot less than Herrera, simply because playing Fellaini isn't the way forward for a team or even club like United, Mourinho knows that. Many are laughing at us for having Fellaini, but not many think the same about Herrera, which kind of proves that it's not just "Herrera's fans" who don't like Fellaini.
No, Fellaini was probably equally bad, maybe even worse. But then you lot pretend he is good at times even when he is our worst player on the pitch. He was also shite in front of goal. But anyway people think that we will be better playing the likes of Herrera instead of the likes of Fellaini who simply isn't type of player who should be playing for us nor move us forward.
Fellaini won't probably play much under Mourinho, or at least he'll play lot less than Herrera, simply because playing Fellaini isn't the way forward for a team or even club like United, Mourinho knows that. Many are laughing at us for having Fellaini, but not many think the same about Herrera, which kind of proves that it's not just "Herrera's fans" who don't like Fellaini.
He is just, you know, a bit average. A sub you throw in in the last 20 minutes when you chase a goal and hope he scores somehow with his mob.
That's exactly how you would explain it. I mean how else would he be able to destroy a Man united side on the opening day of the season all alone?
He is just, you know, a bit average. A sub you throw in in the last 20 minutes when you chase a goal and hope he scores somehow with his mob.
His whole supposed skillset is nullified by the fact he's so clumsy. He should boss games with his size and aggression but he's so sloppy and constantly leads with his elbows and has such exaggerated movements that every other challenge he makes is a stupid foul. I'm sick to death of watching it.
He does.
He does.
Well if you play like Everton, but Belgium and United have different plans than just lumbing the ball every 2 mins all game to his mob and chest.
That's exactly how you would explain it. I mean how else would he be able to destroy a Man united side on the opening day of the season all alone?
He does.
Very rarely. The majority of time he either slows up our play or gives away a needless foul conceding possession and momentum.
He really doesn't. I'd be interested to hear your definition of "bossing" a game.
He does.
Seriously? When played in the right position (to me as the most advanced in a three) he dominates, in my opinion.
When a manager like Mourinho specifically goes out his way to try and mark Fellaini out the game. That's something Sir Alex did with Pirlo, Ozil, etc.
His whole supposed skillset is nullified by the fact he's so clumsy. He should boss games with his size and aggression but he's so sloppy and constantly leads with his elbows and has such exaggerated movements that every other challenge he makes is a stupid foul. I'm sick to death of watching it.
You didn't mention anything about him being average in our current setup. You said he was average. Also, if you think Everton were "lumbing" the ball forward while he played there you didn't follow Everton at all and are just repeating a myth many say on here.
if fellaini starts for your team, it means you are shite. Simple.
if fellaini starts for your team, it means you are shite. Simple.
Fellaini was one of our better midfielders in the last 2.5 months of this season, before that he was absolutely atrocious whenever he played and almost guaranteed the team dropping points.
Fixed Akash.
It's amazing that you're against Zlatan when we were playing such a limited midfielder for the sole reason that he added fight, height and a target when needed.
Fellaini was one of our better midfielders in the last 2.5 months of this season, before that he was absolutely atrocious whenever he played and almost guaranteed the team dropping points.
Fixed Akash.
It's amazing that you're against Zlatan when we were playing such a limited midfielder for the sole reason that he added fight, height and a target when needed.
I think the contrast in quality of the opposition side plays a bigger factor.Yup, not in slightest bit surprised Belgium look a miles better and more fluid team today.
Aside from that being completely bollocks you seemed to have missed the point quite spectacularly.
It has nothing to do with his talent and everything with the way LVG set up the team. With him as a focal point of the attack, United were completely one-dimensional, and the fact that he was chosen by Mourinho has everything to do with the fact that he is a weak link in this scheme and very little with the fact that he is as influential individually as Pirlo/Ozil. And the fact that Zouma completely nullified him also doesn't do Fellaini any favors.When a manager like Mourinho specifically goes out his way to try and mark Fellaini out the game. That's something Sir Alex did with Pirlo, Ozil, etc.
Ireland are not push overs and neither are they slouches.I think the contrast in quality of the opposition side plays a bigger factor.
Nope, I really don't think I have. Who doesn't get shit on here? "Weak overrated Herrera", "old man Carrick", "too slow fat Schweinsteiger", "waste of money sideways Morgan" "sell him to China Rooney"..
Who gets off "easily"?