Feck off to PSG to replace Mbappe,will fit right in with all their other money grabbers. We wouldn't miss him one iota looking at this season
Honestly he does as much work defensively as the average PSG forward (i.e. none).
Feck off to PSG to replace Mbappe,will fit right in with all their other money grabbers. We wouldn't miss him one iota looking at this season
There are many aspects to Rashfords game I don't like, but I can live with to a degree. For example his unwillingness to pass the fecking ball.
However at on stage during the game he got the ball, had options but refuse them (see above) tried to run past multiple players (again see above) lost the ball and did a petulant school kid kind of jump and just walked away with his face in the air.
The guy who won the ball was yards from him. Rashford made no effort to win the ball back, or hassle the guy. He simply acted like a petulant little school girl.
This is unforgivable and he does it too me and time again in games. Feck him off
This is one to watch because it's going to be a big test of the expectations and standards from the INEOS regime. Rashford's been sinking this place out for too long now: a lazy, sullen, non-performer, who contributes almost nothing, again and again. Another streaky spell of goals isn't going to change the fundamentals.
We obviously need to take any opportunity to sell, whether that's PSG or a Saudi side looking at the brand - my fear is that won't happen, or at least won't happen in the next 12 months.
He basically waits for the ball, loses it and then moans a bit and waits for his next turn. He has the attitude everyone hates Bruno for but not the ability.
Don't get me started on Bruno. In the first 5 minutes of the game he switched to that many positions leaving gaps and uncertainty for other players.
In one phase a log ball was played towards him. He won the header, nodding it on to a running Marcus. Instead of running with the play and providing an option for Marcus he fell down holding his head, looking for a free kick. Saw he wasn't Getting it and then got up miraculously cured.
You've don't the hard work, you won the ball. We are in a good position. Get the feck up and play you dullard.
Rashford for Mbappe
I’m saying why on Earth would PSG replace Mbappe with Rashford ? …it’s like replacing a Ferrari with a Fiat UnoI don't know what you mean. I think Rashford is an excellent replacement for Mbappe and should be a high priority for them. At all costs. Like now. Get a bid in now.
I must of missed the bit where he actually ran.I'm so bored of watching this guy running into the blind alleys and putting in half a shift every other game. Just get feckin rid.
An in-form Rashford is a lethal attacking weapon, so if we can get him to perform consistently then we should keep him.
The question is, is he able to maintain a top level form for long periods to make our attack strong?
If the answer is no then there is no point keeping as he is not serving the purpose of keeping him.
https://onefootball.com/en/news/pep...-is-good-enough-to-play-for-man-city-39084435
Despite his inconsistencies, I believe he's one of the very few players we have that scares teams to death, and I believe, managers tactically plan to try and stop him like teams would do with Haaland, Mbappe, Salah, Son, etc.
https://onefootball.com/en/news/pep...-is-good-enough-to-play-for-man-city-39084435
Despite his inconsistencies, I believe he's one of the very few players we have that scares teams to death, and I believe, managers tactically plan to try and stop him like teams would do with Haaland, Mbappe, Salah, Son, etc.
An in form Rashford is a 1 goal in 2 games player (plus a few assists but nothing else, no tracking back no pressing no actions in our own half) and was as lethal as players like Darren Bent or Defore in their prime who were never considered world class.An in-form Rashford is a lethal attacking weapon, so if we can get him to perform consistently then we should keep him.
The question is, is he able to maintain a top level form for long periods to make our attack strong?
If the answer is no then there is no point keeping as he is not serving the purpose of keeping him.
An in form Rashford is a 1 goal in 2 games player (plus a few assists but nothing else, no tracking back no pressing no actions in our own half) and was as lethal as players like Darren Bent or Defore in their prime who were never considered world class.
How many 40GA seasons from left wing have they had out of interest (as I’m generous let’s even include the c.30+ seasons between them that they played CF)?
Does the position really matter if Rashford shot x2 as our striker(s) averaged, almost never track back or press or engage in physical duels?
Just open your eyes, remove your fan-bias and acknowledge that he (1) is not world class, and (2) has played with insufficient efforts.
So, shall we agree it’s none then? How many 30GA seasons then?
Only PSG can save us nowHe can't hold the ball up and has lost the ability to run in behind like he did when younger. His strongest strength is attacking from a wide positions.
He's not worth the 350k, but who would take him on that salary?
So our Left Winger had stats similar to 2 decent EPL strikers in their career years. Thanks.Rashford had 22 goals(17)+assists(5) in 35 league games for Man Utd last season, 0.62 per game
Defoe had 22 goals(18)+assists(4) in 34 league games for Tottenham in 09/10, 0.65 per game
Darren Bent had had 25 goals(24)+assists(1) in 38 league games for Sunderland in 09/10, 0.66 per game
as far as Rashford was a "luxury player" with little output apart from goals and assists (which some football fans love to glorify), his goals and assist output was nothing spectacular. Son and Salah had better goals and assists output while having much better general play (pass and move link up play, pressing, tracking back, etc).
I’m sorry but that’s utter tosh. As a local it should go both ways. He should be showing the desire and hunger that someone that truly loves the club would show. Fans can deal with poor performances, but not lack of effort.Mind blowing agenda against one of our own. He's a local lad. You're not a fan if you can't support him. right?
Whilst I'm not really eager to see the back of him, and this whole bloody team is a mess at the moment so I possibly cut him a bit more slack
AgreedAntony’s crap but his overall game is much better than Rashford. Can actually control the ball and retain possession and at least he works hard out of it. Rashford is a nothing player when he’s not scoring, doesn’t try, doesn’t put himself about, doesn’t use his physical assets. I’ll always like the man and respect him as a person and Manchester Utd fan, but as a player I’ve never been a fan. I don’t think he has all that much talent and really never has. Would be best for Utd if we moved on and replaced him with an all round better player.
I think you're underestimating how ruthless Brailsford is, and I assume SJR too, and also how valuable the profit from the sale of Rashford would be in giving us headroom for rebuilding under FFP/FSR/PSC/PSQ (or whatever it's called these days).There’s no chance we’re selling him. The club see him as the jewel in the flat cap and will try to accommodate him and build the team around him even if he never scores or assists again.
How much will we actually get for him now? He’s more trouble than he’s worth… he’s one of the only players left from the previous managers and I remember Ole saying there’s a bad egg still here at the club. So that’s either him or Martial. Considering Martial never plays I’d guess it’s him that has a big influence on other players and leaks stuff.
Hopefully club owners listen to the English media because he’d be worth £100m and regardless of this slight downturn in form we’d be crazy to sell him
Who told you that? Some of the crap people make up on here is hilarious.There’s no chance we’re selling him. The club see him as the jewel in the flat cap and will try to accommodate him and build the team around him even if he never scores or assists again.