Marcus Rashford image 10

Marcus Rashford England flag

2023-24 Performances


View full 2023-24 profile

4.4 Season Average Rating
Appearances
43
Goals
8
Assists
5
Yellow cards
2
Red cards
1
Status
Not open for further replies.
Probably our best player last year, it’s one game simmer down
No he wasn't, he is an incredibly streaky player who has good spurts not years. Last season in Pl he scored 4 goals in his first 14 pl games. Then finished with 3 goals in last 11 pl games for utd. People remember the 2-3 months where he couldn't stop scoring, forget the 3 months before and 2 months after where he was dogshit.

We will be nothing but liverpool of 90's and 00's if rashford and bruno are our best players.
 
Last edited:
He is not a striker and is playing out of position. He has literally gone on record about this and explained why he wants to stay wide left. You would think our "tactical genius" manager would know that and put him in his preferred position -the position in which he hit 30 goals last year - but apparently not.

I will only judge him when he goes back to his favoured position and is not producing.
 
That is true. I would take someone with Mitoma's mentality to lead the line long before I give the keys to Rashford. Every week that goes by strengthens that concept because results are there.
You’d take a player that didn’t perform as well as Rashford last season in Rashford’s favoured and most suited position because Rashford didn’t have a great game playing in a different position today and last week?
 
It pisses me off. Then people act like it's justified because he does better from the left. When in reality anyone should bust their ass leading the line for Manchester united

This has always bugged me with Rashford. It's worse when he's played on the right. Playing RW should actually suit him but he never gives it a chance. Just sulks because he can't cut in and shoot.

It's a privilege to play for a club like United. There should be no sulking.

Giggs played everywhere he was needed, even LB FFS and there was no sulking.
 
You’d take a player that didn’t perform as well as Rashford last season in Rashford’s favoured and most suited position because Rashford didn’t have a great game playing in a different position today and last week?
I’d take someone who actually wants to put an effort in to help his football club. People wonder why we’re so easy to play against and blame the midfield, but it starts with this lad. It’s incredibly hard to press consistently when one player just trots around up front pretending to be arsed.
 
For those saying we should sell him, did you say that last season when he was banging them in? Honest question. Otherwise it's back to the see saw reaction.
 
Not sure what position he is tbh. I've seen him devastate centre backs as a central striker but I've also seen him look completely out of his depth in the same position. I always used to think he was best suited as left winger because he cuts in so good and shoots from distance very well and you can tell he enjoys that but if you stop him cutting in then he doesn't have any alternatives other than passing back. Harsh to use Ronaldo as an example but he loved cutting in and teeing one off but if the defender forced him wide or along the touchline he'd happily dribble there and put a cross in with his left foot. I don't think I've ever seen rashford do such a thing (probably has). I've heard he prefers playing on the wing and I'm not surprised because it must be daunting playing upfront on your own for us, but I think he's too predictable on the wing.
 
I’d take someone who actually wants to put an effort in to help his football club. People wonder why we’re so easy to play against and blame the midfield, but it starts with this lad. It’s incredibly hard to press consistently when one player just trots around up front pretending to be arsed.

This.

If Rashford started shutting the feck up and putting a better effort, it would be a good start. I don't care if Rashford doesn't like playing in the middle; his job is to adapt to the situation accordingly and to provide something for the opposition to think about at all times. That kind of lazy, sulking attitude people see in Rashford is the exact reason why people were okay with the idea of flogging him to PSG at some point.

If Rashford needs to start next match on the bench to think about his attitude again, then so be it.
 
He seems so humble and down to earth man whenever you see him talk, his off field stuff, giving interviews the latest one with Neville for example yet looks like a fecking primadonna on the pitch with a stinky attitude, lack of effort, terrible workrate and sulking. You won’t believe this is the same player who talks about giving his all, die for the shirt, how much being a united player means to him. What’s going on? Is that all for show and PR?
 
The real nonsense here is those who will argue that someone who, when played slightly askew of their ideal position, is rendered completely redundant as a footballer - including not being able to press, run, jump, challege or look remotely interested - is some kind of top talent the rest of us are mental for criticising.

Even if you listen to what those who defend his performances say, they're indefensible.
 
He is just not a CF, play him on the left where he was more productive
 
No he wasn't, he is an incredibly streaky player who has good spurts not years. Last season in Pl he scored 4 goals in his first 14 pl games. Then finished with 3 goals in last 11 pl games for utd. People remember the 2-3 months where he couldn't stop scoring, forget the 3 months before and 2 months after where he was dogshit.

We will be nothing but liverpool of 90's and 00's if rashford and bruno are our best players.
He was still one of if not our best player
bigger issues to sort out in our squad than Marcus rashford
Imagine having to replace him as well as all the others
 
People deliberately ignoring the fact that, as ever, there's always a significant degree of switching that goes on during the course of any game. As if Ten Hag plants a tree near the opposition goal post and ties him to it.

He had freedoms to wander and switch and had regularly done so in matches where people argue it's okay if he was shit because he was only allowed to stand in one position.

Players from any position can and should end up in a multitude of places on the pitch given how the build up play is progressing/ how the ball is won back. Rashford is no exception. So stop pretending he was tethered to playing through the middle like some kind of naughty step.
 
He is not a striker and is playing out of position. He has literally gone on record about this and explained why he wants to stay wide left. You would think our "tactical genius" manager would know that and put him in his preferred position -the position in which he hit 30 goals last year - but apparently not.

I will only judge him when he goes back to his favoured position and is not producing.

There were times last season where Garnacho came on and Rashford moved centrally and it produced goals and really good attacks so I can see some logic while our new striker is missing. I can't recall it working well when they've started, Garnacho is probably still best used against a tired side and Rashford probably gets bogged down with the role early on and maybe the shift during the game surprises the opposition and Rashford takes his left sided game centrally in a better way.

I'd start him left for sure and try others centrally to work on the defenders.
 
The sad part is Mitoma instead of Rashford instantly makes us a better side, and that’s alarming given the overall reputation of both players.

You see, this just wouldn't happen. Much like saying Bellingham would have ripped it up here as he's doing so for Real.

The problem is, other teams have systems where players can actively thrive. I'm pretty sure had Sancho moved to another big club, and even back in the day, had Pogba moved to Real and not us, both would have looked far better players than they do/did with us.

Since Fergie retired, we basically haven't had a system that allowed players to thrive. Barring a-few month spell under ETH last season, it's all been square pegs/round holes and sloppy, disjointed systems. Mitouma would have looked a dud here, I'm pretty sure.
 
For those saying we should sell him, did you say that last season when he was banging them in? Honest question. Otherwise it's back to the see saw reaction.
Personally I wouldn’t have minded cashing in on the back of his last season form. We could have got £100 million for him at that stage. PSG may even have entertained a swap with mbappe which is what a truly ambitious team would try and do.
 
He seems so humble and down to earth man whenever you see him talk, his off field stuff, giving interviews the latest one with Neville for example yet looks like a fecking primadonna on the pitch with a stinky attitude, lack of effort, terrible workrate and sulking. You won’t believe this is the same player who talks about giving his all, die for the shirt, how much being a united player means to him. What’s going on? Is that all for show and PR?
Basically football is a sport where two teams play against each other and one can win, lose or draw. 11 players on each side. It's very common to see a team look disjointed for many reasons but its rare to find a single player that is the problem. Sometimes players just don't perform. Doesn't have anything to do with their personal life, they are playing top level football ffs.

Do you hold Rashford, solely, accountable for our loss yesterday or are you just a muppet having a go at him because you don't like him? If you say the same thing about at least half of our players then fair enough. Antony for instance is a gentleman by all accounts but doesn't do as much for charity as Rashford does.
 
You see, this just wouldn't happen. Much like saying Bellingham would have ripped it up here as he's doing so for Real.

The problem is, other teams have systems where players can actively thrive. I'm pretty sure had Sancho moved to another big club, and even back in the day, had Pogba moved to Real and not us, both would have looked far better players than they do/did with us.

Since Fergie retired, we basically haven't had a system that allowed players to thrive. Barring a-few month spell under ETH last season, it's all been square pegs/round holes and sloppy, disjointed systems. Mitouma would have looked a dud here, I'm pretty sure.
Exactly. You don't need world class players in every position. A good manager implements a system where the sum is bigger than the parts. That's what's happening at Brighton. Sure, they have som great players. But the majority are just good players who have well-defined roles.
 
You see, this just wouldn't happen. Much like saying Bellingham would have ripped it up here as he's doing so for Real.

The problem is, other teams have systems where players can actively thrive. I'm pretty sure had Sancho moved to another big club, and even back in the day, had Pogba moved to Real and not us, both would have looked far better players than they do/did with us.

Since Fergie retired, we basically haven't had a system that allowed players to thrive. Barring a-few month spell under ETH last season, it's all been square pegs/round holes and sloppy, disjointed systems. Mitouma would have looked a dud here, I'm pretty sure.

I can agree with some of this, but the bottom line is Mitoma is a better final third decision maker and elite 1v1 dribbler, something Rashford is not on either.
 
Personally I wouldn’t have minded cashing in on the back of his last season form. We could have got £100 million for him at that stage. PSG may even have entertained a swap with mbappe which is what a truly ambitious team would try and do.

Never believed those PSG stories for a second. He'd have been an almost comical downgrade for them. All that surely was invention designed to improve his own contract.
 
Never believed those PSG stories for a second. He'd have been an almost comical downgrade for them. All that surely was invention designed to improve his own contract.
Possibly. There have been reports over the years that PSG admire him as a player. They know that mbappe is going so £50 million plus Rashford would have surely been a tempting offer rather than him going for free.
 
Never believed those PSG stories for a second. He'd have been an almost comical downgrade for them. All that surely was invention designed to improve his own contract.
Well there were a fair few credible whispers about that PSG link earlier this summer from a number of sources. And that contract took a while to be signed. Keep an eye on this one, I have a funny feeling we'll be hearing more of it during this season.
 
Really don't rate him at all. He's extremely limited and even during his best ever run, looked decent at best for the majority of those games. He's English and talks the talk, so United will give him ridiculous contracts forever, but he wouldn't get into the starting lineup of a serious top club anywhere. His usual tactic is to run directly towards a defender and hope for the best. When this doesn't work and he loses the ball, he breaks into a plod and loses interest.
 
Possibly. There have been reports over the years that PSG admire him as a player. They know that mbappe is going so £50 million plus Rashford would have surely been a tempting offer rather than him going for free.

I dont think Rashford passes a scouting assessment for any top team. If you happen to watch him sporadically, maybe. But these scouts watch dozens of games of a player and scrutinise every element.

Sure he has good games and he has positive attributes to his play. But so many of the basics simply aren't there. As a footballer he learned to run and do stepovers before he could walk. Hard work and industry may have meant those elements of his game caught up with his overall development. But that hasn't happened.

"Yes he looked awful but maybe if he was played 20 yards slightly to the left, he may have been brilliant" isn't the type of scouting report that leads clubs to spend lots of money.
 
I can agree with some of this, but the bottom line is Mitoma is a better final third decision maker and elite 1v1 dribbler, something Rashford is not on either.
You mean the Mitoma that is older than Rashford and scored the incredible amount of 7 goals and 5 assists in the league last season

Mitoma is a superb player but let’s not get carried away and downplay Rashford so much.
Whether we like it or not, he’s one of our best forwards who just had a 39 G+A season.
 
You mean the Mitoma that is older than Rashford and scored the incredible amount of 7 goals and 5 assists in the league last season

Mitoma is a superb player but let’s not get carried away and downplay Rashford so much.
Whether we like it or not, he’s one of our best forwards who just had a 39 G+A season.
fecking bat shit in here. Rashford is offering nothing apparently after a 30 goal season, 39 goal contributions total, and people reel off players who deliver far less. Talk about familiarity breeding contempt.
 
He is not a striker and is playing out of position. He has literally gone on record about this and explained why he wants to stay wide left. You would think our "tactical genius" manager would know that and put him in his preferred position -the position in which he hit 30 goals last year - but apparently not.

I will only judge him when he goes back to his favoured position and is not producing.

Rashford used to reckon CF was his best position and was a sulky, whining fecker when he had to go out wide. Nowadays he thinks (rightly) that he’s better on the left but it doesn’t excuse his performances or attitude at CF. In fact, he has less excuse than he used to given he’s a senior pro on massive money.

I think the root of his problems and attitude is that he’s just not quite as good as he feels entitled to be. He can be good in spurts, but over time his lack of technique shows him up, even more so at CF and he starts to get frustrated.

We’ve plenty of bigger problems, though…
 
Last edited:
Always trying to dribble or shoot his way out of a poor performance, rather than keep it simple until he gets a bit of a foothold in the game is what constantly frustrates me. Which doesn’t really have any baring on where he’s playing. If he’s playing crap, you know when he gets the ball he’s going to insanely lose it by trying to run through 3 people or shoot from 35 yards, and it becomes incredibly dispiriting. He becomes a dead weight

Its actually something a manager should tell him to cut out, so I can only assume they’ve told him the opposite, considering he always does it and has for years
 
People deliberately ignoring the fact that, as ever, there's always a significant degree of switching that goes on during the course of any game. As if Ten Hag plants a tree near the opposition goal post and ties him to it.

He had freedoms to wander and switch and had regularly done so in matches where people argue it's okay if he was shit because he was only allowed to stand in one position.

Players from any position can and should end up in a multitude of places on the pitch given how the build up play is progressing/ how the ball is won back. Rashford is no exception. So stop pretending he was tethered to playing through the middle like some kind of naughty step.

Switching with who? I don't remember seeing Garnacho or Antony going into the middle. I wonder why that is? Probably because it didn't happen.

Rashford was poor, but there is no need to make stuff up. There was no switching, nor any plan to switch yesterday.
 
The fact he gave off the impression he didn’t want to be up top is the most annoying thing about him .
 
Really don't rate him at all. He's extremely limited and even during his best ever run, looked decent at best for the majority of those games. He's English and talks the talk, so United will give him ridiculous contracts forever, but he wouldn't get into the starting lineup of a serious top club anywhere. His usual tactic is to run directly towards a defender and hope for the best. When this doesn't work and he loses the ball, he breaks into a plod and loses interest.

True. Man Utd will never win the league with hanging its hat on a player like this. The club has to get rid of Rashford to move forward. I've been convinced of that for years and I see nothing to change my view. The likes of Rashford and Shaw are symbols of this barren period.

He is incredibly basic and once his pace starts to wane fifteen per cent he will be toast.
 
Needs to be told to keep it simple. As a lead striker keep it simple - touch, hold, pass.

He is trying too many turns and dribbles.
 
Needs to be told to keep it simple. As a lead striker keep it simple - touch, hold, pass.

He is trying too many turns and dribbles.

I don't think he can play any other way. This is why he looks so inept if you ask him to adapt and deviate from his ideal playing style even slightly. Left sided forward being asked to play centrally being an ask so undeniably insurmountable really isn't normal. With Rashford it's reality.
 
He’s basically our version of Theo Walcott. Fast, good finish. Not much else. Been the same for years minus a couple of purple patches. FYI i am meaning the Arsenal Walcott who was putting up about 1 goal every 3/4 games. Rashfords stats aren’t too different either but from watching him play he’s not got much more in his locker surely than what we’ve seen for years. Him and Martial have been first team players since the 15/16 season. It’s 2023 and they are both still here. One is injured all the time and the other is our highest paid player and stinks the place up when he isn’t getting his own way. Really hope Hojlund offers something different.
 
For those saying we should sell him, did you say that last season when he was banging them in? Honest question. Otherwise it's back to the see saw reaction.

I was and still of the thought that we need to sell him in the near future before he is really, really bad. The problem is I dont trust United to do better with his replacement.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.