I don’t think you’ve answered the question I posed to you earlier. There are multiple, world class forwards and wingers over the past 15/20/30 years who weren’t performing to a high class level at the same age of Rashford or even at the age of 23. You can take the list of names I mentioned earlier and the same still applies to most of the list at the age of 23 and even 24.
221 senior appearances are all well and good but you have to factor in the stunted growth of the team during the Mourinho years in which a good portion of those appearances were made.
Again, people aren’t saying that critically analysing our own players is a bad thing, it’s making outlandish statements and predictions with no evidence to support said claims which people rightly have a problem about, such as portions of your original post.
No one has stated that Rashford will become world class, we are just stating that at the age he is (which is 22), he is more than producing the goods compared to other wingers his age in history and present (apart from the obvious wonderkids that I need not list again).
One good game in three? Maybe Rashford of 2 years ago. His base level has risen and he can contributes to creating a goal scoring opportunity in every game. This will most probably improve with age.
A fight for fourth? Players like Sterling, Salah and Mane have been vital cogs in PL winning machines over the past three seasons. Again I ask, Salah and Mane at Rashfords age, even at 24 were nothing more than good wingers nothing more? The level that they are now was a result of natural progression and a high level of coaching that hopefully we can get from Ole, McKenna and Carrick. The same for Sterling who you probably don’t think is world class as he has similar weaknesses to Rashford but has hit 20+ goals in all comps for third season in a row.
When do we expect him to get there? We don’t know. But he has more than enough time to get there. The way you talk about him it’s like he’s in his prime and he has no room for development or growth. It’s objectively wrong.
Martial on the left is not as good as Rashford which has been proven. Greenwood has only started 10 games for us so cannot be judged. Sancho, i'll give you that he is an elite talent. Name four more left inside forwards in the world realistically available that would hold down a place in the side for the long term. I don't think you can.
So what's your point then? Are you saying Rashford is world-class, or will be world-class in the future? My point has been clear all along, I think he can be good/very good but I don't think he can be world class. I really, really don't see how that statement/opinion is in any way outlandish.
I'll address some of the points you make, just for the sake of debate, but you have to answer the above categorically - because otherwise you agree with me if all we're saying is he'll turn out to be good or very good but not world class.
First of all, I don't accept that Jose 'stunted Rashford's growth' - I'd like to see the evidence of that. You can't possibly quantify it. On the subject of naming players who did X....I could name you 50 who would say Mourinho is a superb coach and that they wouldn't be half the player they where now without him. So let's put that 'stunted' argument to one side because it's a total non-starter for me.
Second of all, I also dispute Rashford is a better AML than Martial. On the contrary, I believe Martial is playing CF because he's proven himself to be a far superior CF than Rashford, not because Rashford has proven himself the superior AML. Again, do you dispute this? I don't think you do but you may want to argue differently? Again, it's not really hugely relevant to the 'world-class' debate because Martial isn't world-class either!!
I don't really understand your point about Salah, Mane and Sterling either. Sterling WAS performing at a very high-level from a very young age and the other two followed completely different career trajectories. If Rashford had turned 18 in 2007 would he have played 200+ games for the first team over the next three seasons? Absolutely not. Would that have made him a better or worse player now? Who knows? So all of this is totally circumstantial and subjective.
I believe all three of the players you mentioned (Salah, Mane, Sterling) are now world-class, I would say their records and their trophy cabinets back that up. I think you implied I can't rate Sterling if I don't rate Rashford? Well that's nonsense because as you kindly point out, Sterling's numbers are far superior to Rashford's, despite never having played as a CF (Rashford has at times). Of course, nobody can categorically prove one way or another whether Rashford will get to this level but do you dispute that right now, all three are better than Rashford?
See, this is my whole problem with the 'Rashford WILL BE world-class argument. I asked you when, you said you 'didn't know'. So how long does he get? He isn't world-class now, every pro-Rashford response I have seen accepts that. They all say he WILL be world-class. I'm saying based on all the evidence I see with my own eyes every single game, I don't see where this sudden explosion is coming from in terms of getting him to the level required. So my point is, you guys will never be wrong. Every year fans will come back and critique Marcus and every year you lot will say 'ah but he's still young', 'ah but better numbers than player X at the same age', 'ah but LvG/Jose/Ole stunted his growth', 'ah but he had a bad injury that year', 'ah but he was played out of position that year', 'ah but he was tired from a busy schedule that year' etc....etc...the list goes on. So how can we (let's call us the 'sceptics' ever win this argument? What would you accept as conclusive proof Rashford isn't a world class player?
You could see it with Rooney at 18, you could see it with Ronaldo at 18, you could see it with Mbappe at 18, you can see it with Mason at 18. Again, not all players follow the same trajectory, but I think we're fast approaching the point where if Rashford is going to be world-class, he needs to prove it soon.
And if we're looking at stats, Rashford has eight league goals this season in open play. I'm not interested in an argument about whether penalties 'count'....however, with Fernandes now a regular he won't be taking many next year....so the fact is if he's going to push on to 15/20 goals (which I think we all accept is about right for a world-class AML in a top side) he needs to find another 7-12 goals in open play. He may do that, he may not do that, who knows? But it does mean the penalty debate is at least relevant to this argument, because if Fernandes takes 90% of our pens next year his output in open play HAS to go up.
Now please highlight what I have said that is unfair, speculative or outlandish? It seems like you have to say something nice about Rashford if you imply he's not Maradone MK2, so I'll just add here that, just to remind everybody, HE DOES HAVE SOME VERY GOOD QUALITIES AND SHOULD REMAIN PART OF OUR SQUAD FOR THE LONG-TERM. That OK as a caveat?