Great finish for his goal
So amidst all the chaos of yesterday, seems this chap has completely flown under the radar and hasn't been scrutinised in any way despite folding with the rest of the team instead of stepping up and being the stabilising conduit they could all rely on in the eye of the storm.
He gets praised when he does well, but there's an eerie silence when he has bad games.
I rate him highly, but he's yet to really come to the fore in a maximum pressure game. When his side are doing well or it's an exciting, but even contest, he looks like a Rolls Royce, but when things are bad and he needs to step up and be counted, he's not the same player.
Pogba gets lambasted, rightfully, for his his mental strength when he's really needed, and so should Verratti, as this is supposed to be a key strength he has over Pogba.
So amidst all the chaos of yesterday, seems this chap has completely flown under the radar and hasn't been scrutinised in any way despite folding with the rest of the team instead of stepping up and being the stabilising conduit they could all rely on in the eye of the storm.
He gets praised when he does well, but there's an eerie silence when he has bad games.
I rate him highly, but he's yet to really come to the fore in a maximum pressure game. When his side are doing well or it's an exciting, but even contest, he looks like a Rolls Royce, but when things are bad and he needs to step up and be counted, he's not the same player.
Pogba gets lambasted, rightfully, for his his mental strength when he's really needed, and so should Verratti, as this is supposed to be a key strength he has over Pogba.
I criticised him in another thread for his performance last night, seemed lost. But didn't he do this when PSG were down to ten men against Chelsea at Stamford Bridge? Maximum pressure game and wasn't an even contest going by player count?
It's one game. Xavi was on the pitch when barcelona lost 4-0 and 3-0 against bayern. Pirlo was on the pitch in La Coruna.So amidst all the chaos of yesterday, seems this chap has completely flown under the radar and hasn't been scrutinised in any way despite folding with the rest of the team instead of stepping up and being the stabilising conduit they could all rely on in the eye of the storm.
He gets praised when he does well, but there's an eerie silence when he has bad games.
I rate him highly, but he's yet to really come to the fore in a maximum pressure game. When his side are doing well or it's an exciting, but even contest, he looks like a Rolls Royce, but when things are bad and he needs to step up and be counted, he's not the same player.
Pogba gets lambasted, rightfully, for his his mental strength when he's really needed, and so should Verratti, as this is supposed to be a key strength he has over Pogba.
Well saidIt's one game. Xavi was on the pitch when barcelona lost 4-0 and 3-0 against bayern. Pirlo was on the pitch in La Coruna.
He's rated as one of, if not the best, midfielder of his type by many on here, as a given, like it's irrefutable, even. He doesn't receive half the scrutiny of others who are categorised as such. PSG is a different matter, as they, as a team, aren't rated much, so them crashing and burning isn't anything unusual or new.Pogba is our player, we don't give two fecks about Verratti or PSG and there is no point scrutinizing anyone since the entire PSG team failed miserably.
PSG schooled Chelsea as a whole. Everyone was on their game that night, and he was obviously a key component, but I'm talking about games where they're genuinely up against it and have to get themselves back in control of the game.I criticised him in another thread for his performance last night, seemed lost. But didn't he do this when PSG were down to ten men against Chelsea at Stamford Bridge? Maximum pressure game and wasn't an even contest going by player count?
Not really a good equivalency as Xavi has countless credit in the bank of stepping up and being the hub of his team in games that would have otherwise been lost. Verratti goes down with the ship - if they're bad, he's bad.It's one game. Xavi was on the pitch when barcelona lost 4-0 and 3-0 against bayern. Pirlo was on the pitch in La Coruna.
He's rated as one of, if not the best, midfielder of his type by many on here, as a given, like it's irrefutable, even. He doesn't receive half the scrutiny of others who are categorised as such. PSG is a different matter, as they, as a team, aren't rated much, so them crashing and burning isn't anything unusual or new.
When has that happened beside yesterday?Not really a good equivalency as Xavi has countless credit in the bank of stepping up and being the hub of his team in games that would have otherwise been lost. Verratti goes down with the ship - if they're bad, he's bad.
For the type of player he is, he is supposed to be the dependable conduit who settles everyone else down whilst acting as the stabilising presence for his team ala Scholes, Xavi, Modric etc. he's supposed to show composure and class that is a level above the rest of his team, as comes with being classified as what he is (one of the best in the world). He could have come out of yesterday's game looking like a superstar if he had've kept his head and showed the class and competence associated with his game (when things are going well).I though Rabiot or the CBs didn't do him any favours. Yes he poor yesterday though, must be said.
That's too reductive. He's a big reason why as he is their conduit others are supposed to depend upon.He and his teammates had a terrible game, there is nothing to scrutinize.
PSG schooled Chelsea as a whole. Everyone was on their game that night, and he was obviously a key component, but I'm talking about games where they're genuinely up against it and have to get themselves back in control of the game.
I didn't say anything about Maradona-esque, I said games that would have otherwise been lost, or to extend upon that, games where their midfield would not have held up if Xavi was not being an everpresent force constantly showing and using the ball in the way he did.When has that happened beside yesterday?
When has xavi turned a game around for barcelona? Both are type of players that need their teammates to be able to do something to be effective. They're not Zidane(and Zidane also had bad games in his career. So did Messi. Heck, even Maradona had bad games)
Verratti's still 23, too.
That's too reductive. He's a big reason why as he is their conduit others are supposed to depend upon.
When have xavi, scholes or modric done that in big games while the entire team played like a bunch of 8 year olds?For the type of player he is, he is supposed to be the dependable conduit who settles everyone else down whilst acting as the stabilising presence for his team ala Scholes, Xavi, Modric etc. he's supposed to show composure and class that is a level above the rest of his team, as comes with being classified as what he is (one of the best in the world). He could have come out of yesterday's game looking like a superstar if he had've kept his head and showed the class and competence associated with his game (when things are going well).
In the CL QF stages or rd of 16, which they get knocked out at every year?PSG since Ancelotti and through Blanc rarely had to get themselves back in control of games because they were the ones controlling it with Verratti and Thiago Motta.
In the CL QF stages or rd of 16, which they get knocked out at every year?
How is he not? Get the ball to him, he kills the onrushing team, opens up the field, brings his team-mates into the play, shows the composure others cannot and generally settles his team. He is the quintessential midfielder of that type - they all do the exact same role.No he isn't, football particularly at that level is a collective game. You don't take the midfield back against Barcelona with one player, you don't do it against Madrid or Bayern either. Verratti is the most important cog in the machinery but he isn't the machinery.
They don't play Barca every year they are knocked out.Yes, because Barcelona have had the best team in the history.
He missed the first leg against barcelona in 2015, where they lost 3-0 at home. He missed both games against city last season. Was running the show at the camp nou in 2013 as a 20 year old until messi came on and the whole of PSG folded.In the CL QF stages or rd of 16, which they get knocked out at every year?
How is he not? Get the ball to him, he kills the onrushing team, opens up the field, brings his team-mates into the play, shows the composure others cannot and generally settles his team. He is the quintessential midfielder of that type - they all do the exact same role.
Which requires his teammates to do something. The few times he did that yesterday, he'd look up and see not a single open teammate to pass the ball toHow is he not? Get the ball to him, he kills the onrushing team, opens up the field, brings his team-mates into the play, shows the composure others cannot and generally settles his team. He is the quintessential midfielder of that type - they all do the exact same role.
Barca don't have the money to buy him. Not even close.Looks like he's nailed on to join Barca after his questionable comments after the game.
they just signed two record breaking sponsorship deals...Barca don't have the money to buy him. Not even close.
Game's starting now, anyway. When you have a conduit, he enables the rest to a degree, which is the strength and weakness of that kind of player. If they're bad the others will not find their feet as they rely on the hub to settle the game down.Because you need 10 other players.
Come on... that practically absolves him of any of the key responsbilities of his role. You're basically saying he was on it, but those around him were not.Which requires his teammates to do something. The few times he did that yesterday, he'd look up and see not a single open teammate to pass the ball to
I'm still waiting for examples of big games in which scholes/xavi/pirlo/modric single-handedly turned their teammates performances around like you're saying
Then who does?Barca don't have the money to buy him. Not even close.
No, i'm saying he had a bad game, but because of the type of player he is, he was bad in part because his teammates were so very bad.Game's starting now, anyway. When you have a conduit, he enables the rest to a degree, which is the strength and weakness of that kind of player. If they're bad the others will not find their feet as they rely on the hub to settle the game down.
Come on... that practically absolves him of any of the key responsbilities of his role. You're basically saying he was on it, but those around him were not.
No. I'm asking for examples of big games in which United/Barcelona/Milan/Juve/Madrid were comically inept as a team and scholes/xavi/pirlo/modric turned their teammates performances aroundYou're waiting for me to give examples of the cornerstone of these players' entire career? It's what they did and why they have the reputation that they do. I'd ask how often were they found lost or wanting in games, not the other way round. Scholes settled us countless times in Europe and gave others the platform to perform that they had.
Game's starting now, anyway. When you have a conduit, he enables the rest to a degree, which is the strength and weakness of that kind of player. If they're bad the others will not find their feet as they rely on the hub to settle the game down.