Exactly! Which I don’t understand why so many people are chomping at the bit to get rid of them when it’s clear they’re not the problem
I think it’s probably because they were employed by the Glazers to be agreeable yes men, rather than based on their previous brilliance at the job they’ve been given.
So while it’s true that working under the Glazers must make it difficult to do a great job here, it’s also true that they’ve been employed by the Glazers to do what they’re currently doing.
So it’s probably a best case scenario of - they
might turn out to be amazing at their job if given the right circumstances, but when did the Glazers employ anyone in the infrastructure of the running of Man Utd who was amazing at their job?
Tbh if I were a new owner that was serious about Utd being successful, I’d look to phase out literally
every element of the Glazer’s ownership, with ETH being the only figure I’d be interested in keeping on.
A club of Utd’s size and means must be aiming to employ best in class. You can’t have little clubs like Brighton and Brentford employing better infrastructure than Utd ffs - there’s literally no excuse for it.
Would any of these guys get a job at Brighton? If not, why not?
And if the honest answer to the above is ‘no’, then why are they employed and earning top coin at the biggest club in the country?