Trizy
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2014
- Messages
- 12,009
Would honestly be happy with those newest ''leaked'' Red, white and black kits.
still don't like United having the standard design they are selling to any team. We are United and our kit should not only be identified as ours by sponsor and badge.
I don't like it. How is that "bloody beautiful"?
Yea, it's nothing special imo.I don't like it. How is that "bloody beautiful"?
Indeed.this is all adidas knows how to make. three stripes, adjust colours to team and ta-da.
Simple, smart, and no gimmicks. That's all you really need.
Agreed. Simplicity is key.
Couldn't care less if it's an Adidas template either. A football shirt is just a t shirt with a badge and a sponsor anyway. Kits that are 'original' tend to be the totally ghastly ones, like kits made by Warrior. and Under Armor.
I like that leaked design but what is with the weird double hem? It looks like someone has forgotten their P.E. kit and has had to throw on a shirt out of lost property over the tope of their vest.
I think nike made a good job providing unique kits. I didn't like all of them but that won't be the case with any supplier.
Unique doesn't mean the kit must catch everyone's eye or be something spectacular. Simple red with black and white trim was perfect (2011/12). Typical United and was never seen at other clubs.
They also involved history. 2009-10 remembered something with OT, 2012-13 was down to the history of the city with clothing industries.
Even if a lot disliked that "tablecloath" design, it had a message to the world that we are different and not like any other club on this planet. It wasn't "just a kit", it meant something and that is a big difference which I was glad to have with our kits.
Adidas is straight the opposite, they make us look exchangeable. I know what I prefer then...
I think nike made a good job providing unique kits. I didn't like all of them but that won't be the case with any supplier.
Unique doesn't mean the kit must catch everyone's eye or be something spectacular. Simple red with black and white trim was perfect (2011/12). Typical United and was never seen at other clubs.
They also involved history. 2009-10 remembered something with OT, 2012-13 was down to the history of the city with clothing industries.
Even if a lot disliked that "tablecloath" design, it had a message to the world that we are different and not like any other club on this planet. It wasn't "just a kit", it meant something and that is a big difference which I was glad to have with our kits.
Adidas is straight the opposite, they make us look exchangeable. I know what I prefer then...
that's what i'm absolutely flabbergasted by when i read most of the comments here... ALL ADIDAS KITS LOOK THE SAME. why would we want that?
All the kit manufacturers are as bad to be fair, all Nike's kits look pretty much the same every year as well. All these kits are identical to our blue 3rd kit by the looks of it.