Annahnomoss
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2012
- Messages
- 10,101
God, I hope people won't overcomplicate the whole performance level thing, that could turn the whole draft into an annoying nightmare. It is of some relevance, but most great players performed consistently well during their peaks no matter who the manager was.
For example, I wouldn't pick van der Sar as the goalkeeper if I picked Ancelotti as the manager, because his spell at Juve sucked, no two ways about it. Such obvious examples should count, but I really hope we won't go into extreme nitpicking.
Yeah a bit towards this. If a player was in his peak and your manager took over, then he should be rated highly as a player even if he didn't perform at a top level as he'd presumably keep his level, especially if he continued at a high level after leaving your manager/team.
Don't be anal about the peak/performance level. Some managers will have managed a player for 15 matches but it is okay, it is how this draft will work. Can't expect and judge three year peaks etc.
Especially considering national team managers will sometimes have played 8 matches or whatever with their team.