Man Utd?

Nope, and I don't give a feck.
I was being sarky by the way, knowing that cheeky slag Lao is a Swedey...
A childish aussie calling names.. Now that's something you don't get to see every day.. Don't see where my nick begins with a capital letter by the way, you're just as ignorant as the muppets ManYoo-ing.
 
A childish aussie calling names.. Now that's something you don't get to see every day.. Don't see where my nick begins with a capital letter by the way, you're just as ignorant as the muppets ManYoo-ing.

Silence before I claim Sweden rightly back for the Danes...
As Is aid you cocksniffer, I was being sarcastic.
Apart from the fit blonde chicks, Swedish people are shit.....
 
Silence before I claim Sweden rightly back for the Danes...
As Is aid you cocksniffer, I was being sarcastic.
Apart from the fit blonde chicks, Swedish people are shit.....
Ah yeah, the regular cocksniffer insult. Your conversation skills are astounding. You grew up jerking off to Nickelodeon in the absence of your crocodile hunter of a father?

Just love snotty-nosed debating. You've got any more ways of making a fool of yourself, please let us know.
 
Ah yeah, the regular cocksniffer insult. Your conversation skills are astounding. You grew up jerking off to Nickelodeon in the absence of your crocodile hunter of a father?

Just love snotty-nosed debating. You've got any more ways of making a fool of yourself, please let us know.

At least my dad hunted crocodiles and not raped reindeers, no wonder Rudolph's nose was so bright.
 
This is from ThaBigBoss in the newbies.
He asked if I'd post it for him ,so here goes.......



Right Folks here we go once "AGAIN" and for all....... Man Utd is not a term REAL / TRUE United fans refer themselves to... WHY??? This term is mostly only used by other supporters as a complete and utter insult.

In case anyone on this board is not aware rival supporters used to sing a song about Munich and it goes:
Man Utd Man Utd went on a plane, Man Utd Man Utd never came back again...
Now if thats not getting your blood boiling nothing will..

I started this thread way last year on another forum because after being on that board for some time I found more and more people refering to us as THAT name.

We are UNITED, MAN UTD, MANCHESTER UNITED, RED DEVILS. We do not have any songs with THAT name in them nor will you be able to buy any official merchandice using that term, it is not printed on any scarves or badges, also I was at the Reading game and there is no way did that song ring out around the ground.
Now I have been a "United" supporter all my life I am 18 and have never used that phrase to describe the name of my team. It even has annoyed me to write about the song with the name in it, but thought I had to just to get my point over to people who have never heard it ( real United fans forgive me please )

It goes:
Man
U
Never
Intended
Coming
Home

You dont use the phrase Man C Leeds U Aston V etc etc. So dont use 'Man Utd'. Like the song goes "Theres Only One United" so people will know who you support when using this term. All said whenever someone calls us 'Man Utd' I simply correct them. And I think this should be implimented on this board.

So come on lads lets educate the ones that need it and keep THAT name away form our club and this board.The term Utd is the proper abbreviation for the word United and nothing else.Why can some people not just accept this and get over themselves....

If anyone still doesnt understand the "u" is meant to be "you" by the rival fans. It wasnt just chants it was also popular to write this as graffiti
as far as i know this insult dates back to the early 60,s and it wasnt ´Pile fans surprise.

There was huge competition between clubs to sign Duncan Edwards when he was a schoolboy in the early 50s and there was even a newspaper campaign in the midlands to pressure him into signing for a midlands club, as he came from Dudley. His signing for United caused a lot of people in the midlands to regard him as a traitor and he was painted as such by local rags and was a bit of a hate figure for some idiots.
As far as i know it was West Brom fans who first sang (and sorry for posting this)

Duncan Edwards is manure,rotting in his grave
Man You are manure-rotting in your grave

The origin of 'Man Utd' is a song to insult the dead Duncan Edwards.
The ´Pile and Leeds fans copied this with their own 'Man You' /u versions to insult all of the lads who died at Munich.
I hope that makes it a bit clearer that saying Man Utd is a mortal insult, particularly to the older supporters and is fighting talk TBH. A lot of rival fans got a good kicking for the 'Man Utd' insult and to see so-called united fans using it now is shameful.

I hope a few might read this,understand and spread the word.

I also hope a few other people can add a bit to this as i am sure it is only half the full story.

Thanks, ThaBigBoss

this is the answer i am waiting for, thank you!:boring:
 
Living in Sydney, I love it when experts tell me that there are more City fans in Manchester than United fans, and have also been questioned when I refer to United as 'The Reds'. They have told me in all their wisdom that it is Liverpool who are called the Reds and that United are known as 'The Red Devils'.
Never when I have been to Old Trafford or in the pub in Manchester or Sydney or wherever ever heard anyone refer to us informally as 'The Red Devils' except perhaps in a newspaper article.
Don't worry Johnno...

I have never known an Aussie to talk sense, they know feck all, just humour them.
 
'Man Utd' is what the ABUs, the cockneys and the clueless call us. If you fit into any of those categories please carry on.

It's United, Man United or just plain Manchester (really pisses off city, that)

Just heard Steve Bruce refer to "Man Utd" on SSN. You'd think he would know better.
 
I have got used to using "Manchester" in the past couple of years, everyone understands and it really pisses off the occasion City fan who hears me. :lol:
 
I never really understood what the problem with 'Man Utd' is?
I dont use it myself but it doesnt bother me if someone else uses it

Although it does piss of City fans, I actually dont like being reffered to as just plain 'Manchester' - mostly due to the fact that it is only clueless foreigners who ever do it.
 
Been reading Lee Sharpe's book lately - he refers to us constantly as Man Utd. I don't think he's trying to annoy anyone though, so I guess it's all about context.
 
I never really understood what the problem with 'Man Utd' is?
I dont use it myself but it doesnt bother me if someone else uses it

Although it does piss of City fans, I actually dont like being reffered to as just plain 'Manchester' - mostly due to the fact that it is only clueless foreigners who ever do it.

It has been explained numerous times in this thread, and if you don't have a problem with it now, there's something wrong.
 
It has been explained numerous times in this thread, and if you don't have a problem with it now, there's something wrong.

If you read the thread you will find fans who have supported United for decades saying it is a non issue - plus fans from Manchester saying they and others they know use it - why do you ignore those posts and take it that the other view is the correct one?
 
If you read the thread you will find fans who have supported United for decades saying it is a non issue - plus fans from Manchester saying they and others they know use it - why do you ignore those posts and take it that the other view is the correct one?

What, the view where I'll refuse to use a term that was used to mock the dead, irrelevant of the fact that it was the babes? Yeah, I believe that's correct.
 
United supporters used to use the term Man Utd in the 60's and 70's but it has gradually become a term only used by scousers and ABU's.


That is true in my early days at OT mid 60s onwards Man Utd was frequently used by everyone, not sure when I changed usualy use United now.
I can hear my mate now " are you going to Man Utd on Saturday" hes been dead a few years now, and games were almost always Saturday afternoon with European nights mid week, or thats what my failing memory tells me anyway
With hindsight I think United or Man United sounds better than Man Utd anyway, but I dont ever remember hearing it being considered an insult.

United has a little arrogance about it : The rest may have United in there name title but as far as we are concerned "There is only one United"
 
Been reading Lee Sharpe's book lately - he refers to us constantly as Man Utd. I don't think he's trying to annoy anyone though, so I guess it's all about context.
He's had more clubs (9?) than Monty, some of them in Yorkshite so it's understandable, if a little lazy. What, Sharpie, a little lazy?
Still, you've got to love him though.
 
What, the view where I'll refuse to use a term that was used to mock the dead, irrelevant of the fact that it was the babes? Yeah, I believe that's correct.

Well that's upto you mate - but I dont find the term Man Utd offensive and neither do many others as they have pointed out in this thread.
 
There's only one United. The Man Utd thing started by fans of other teams who believe there is another United out there. BUT I repeat, there is only one United!
 
If I have to write it, I write Man Utd or Man United. I'm too lazy a twat to write Manchester. Effing hell, I even had to correct that spelling twice.

If I'm talking to somebody, I just say Manchester United.
 
I think it's mainly older fans who don't like it, but that might be a little bit of a generalisation.
My dad hates it, and can't stand people using it, and his reason is that those that use it are usually 'cockney reds' or 'glory supporters', and he can't stand glory hunters because he had to go through the barren years of 1970s and 80s.
So I think it has something to do with long-term supporters hating those who jump on the bandwagon when we're successful when they had to endure decades of nothing.
 
As a Salford kid I was brought up on United, but Man Utd was just what some people, including plenty of United fans called us. It wasn't considered an insult or a cause for offence - it just sounded "funny"

It was onIy was later, and I'm not sure how much later, than it started to sound like a term of abuse.

I have a soft spot for Manchester though. I've come to see it as like Milan being Milan, Inter being Inter, and City being crap.
 
"There was huge competition between clubs to sign Duncan Edwards when he was a schoolboy in the early 50s and there was even a newspaper campaign in the midlands to pressure him into signing for a midlands club, as he came from Dudley. His signing for United caused a lot of people in the midlands to regard him as a traitor and he was painted as such by local rags and was a bit of a hate figure for some idiots.
As far as i know it was West Brom fans who first sang (and sorry for posting this)

Duncan Edwards is manure,rotting in his grave
Man You are manure-rotting in your grave

The origin of 'Man Utd' is a song to insult the dead Duncan Edwards."



I cannot believe for one second that the term Man Utd relates to Duncan Edwards.

While there was a lot of competition for his signature, why would West Brom fans make up a song about a 15 year-old in 1952 that most Mancunians had yet to hear about?

He was a Wolves fan so they would have been delighted he didn't sign for their local rivals!

In 1952 people weren't singing songs about hoping a 15-year-old was rotting in his grave. You just wouldn't get away with it.

I wouldn't put any credence in that story at all!
 
P271_01.gif


That's what has been used by the Finnish media, for instance, for as long as I can remember (almost 20 years).
 
I've heard that "Man Utd" story a fair few times, and yet never from anybody old enough to remember, and it does seem a little off to me. If it were such a big issue, then why are United so often referred to in that way? It seems many of our players from the 90's refer to us as "Man Utd", so it would be quite odd if this story were true. My main gripe with the name is it tends to be a term used by non-United fans, in the same way few football fans refer to the game as "footie". It just doesn't sound right more than anything.

And on the topic of disliking our team being referred to as Manchester, especially by foreigners, it's something I've never understood. Many foreign teams have longer names (such as Lyon are Olympique Lyonnais), and yet we refer to them by only the city name. And to an even larger degree, despite our knowledge of at least two top flight teams in the city, we still often refer to Real Madrid simply as Real (seemingly forgetting the likes of Sociadad and Betis) or Madrid (forgetting about Athletico). And to the same degree when the name Milan comes up, it's taken to mean AC Milan, whereas Inter Milan are referred to as merely Inter. As much as I'd prefer, on a personal level, that we were more distinguished from our local rivals in others minds, we do the same when it comes to foreign teams, so quit bitching about it.
 
That's what has been used by the Finnish media, for instance, for as long as I can remember (almost 20 years).

That's 'Manchester U' though. I have no problems with that. For me, 'Man Utd' is lazy and disrespectful to my football team (United) and my city (Manchester). I can just about bear Man Utd but Man Utd is a step too far.
 
And on the topic of disliking our team being referred to as Manchester, especially by foreigners, it's something I've never understood. Many foreign teams have longer names (such as Lyon are Olympique Lyonnais), and yet we refer to them by only the city name. And to an even larger degree, despite our knowledge of at least two top flight teams in the city, we still often refer to Real Madrid simply as Real (seemingly forgetting the likes of Sociadad and Betis) or Madrid (forgetting about Athletico). And to the same degree when the name Milan comes up, it's taken to mean AC Milan, whereas Inter Milan are referred to as merely Inter. As much as I'd prefer, on a personal level, that we were more distinguished from our local rivals in others minds, we do the same when it comes to foreign teams, so quit bitching about it.
Lyon are the only team in the city so to refer to them as Lyon is fine since Lyonnais (of Lyon) is bound inextricably with Olympique of which there is another in Ligue Un. I call Real Madrid, Real Madrid for the reasons you correctly cite. Milan football is a funny thing. One club is pronounced 'Meelan' and not 'Meelano' (the city's Italian name) since it was founded by British people as a cricket club and later the name Milan became pronounced Meelan and the other is called Inter since they are proud to be Internazionale and are referred to as such by Italians themselves.
I'll bitch about it as much as I like, thanks.
 
I don't have a problem with it, especially since hearing older Manchester based supporters using it. And players.

The usage has been twisted by ABUs as a form of abuse - personally, I'd use it all the more just to take the wind out of their sails, although I generally just say United.

It's a bit irritating to hear people getting worked up about it because it just makes the anti-Utd. brigade do it all the more.
 
I think it's mainly older fans who don't like it, but that might be a little bit of a generalisation.
My dad hates it, and can't stand people using it, and his reason is that those that use it are usually 'cockney reds' or 'glory supporters', and he can't stand glory hunters because he had to go through the barren years of 1970s and 80s.
So I think it has something to do with long-term supporters hating those who jump on the bandwagon when we're successful when they had to endure decades of nothing.

So Cockney reds are glory supporters?

I hate that kind of generalisation. Weren't United the most supported team in the old Div. 2 after they were relegated? Weren't a lot of those supporters from out of town?

A clue...yes.

Every winning team will have it's glory seekers, and probably some of them even live within a few miles of Old Trafford. But there were thousands of OOTs who supported them before and after they were relegated, and to speak that way about "Cockney Reds" is out of order imo.

Glory seekers are one thing - but don't just lump one section of fans in that category.
 
Man Utd gets used b/c that's what you see in the TV in the scoreboard commentary box ... e..g united v. liverpool would be : Man Utd v LIV ... so people get used to calling united Man Utd ... just use united
 
Man Utd, to close to manure. I use Manchester United, treat the name with respect etc...
On the telly during games its " mau", hate that.
 
The term "Man Utd" is rather vulgar. only numpties, kids who dont know any better or ABUs say it.

Actually Bryan Robson said it - in an interview with MUTV (must admit I was slightly shocked - as he certainly should know not to use it after spending 13-14 years at the club)
 
So Cockney reds are glory supporters?
I hate that kind of generalisation. Weren't United the most supported team in the old Div. 2 after they were relegated? Weren't a lot of those supporters from out of town?

A clue...yes.

Every winning team will have it's glory seekers, and probably some of them even live within a few miles of Old Trafford. But there were thousands of OOTs who supported them before and after they were relegated, and to speak that way about "Cockney Reds" is out of order imo.

Glory seekers are one thing - but don't just lump one section of fans in that category.

No, that's not what I meant, although it did look that way.

I meant the cockney-reds-that-are-glory-supporters, not cockney reds in themselves. I'm sure there are plenty of people not far from OT that are glory supporters and plenty of people living in the south that have supported United for decades.

And fwiw, technically I'm a 'cockney red', but, like many people, I have family links to Manchester, hence why I support United.
 
"There was huge competition between clubs to sign Duncan Edwards when he was a schoolboy in the early 50s and there was even a newspaper campaign in the midlands to pressure him into signing for a midlands club, as he came from Dudley. His signing for United caused a lot of people in the midlands to regard him as a traitor and he was painted as such by local rags and was a bit of a hate figure for some idiots.
As far as i know it was West Brom fans who first sang (and sorry for posting this)

Duncan Edwards is manure,rotting in his grave
Man You are manure-rotting in your grave

The origin of 'Man Utd' is a song to insult the dead Duncan Edwards."



I cannot believe for one second that the term Man Utd relates to Duncan Edwards.

While there was a lot of competition for his signature, why would West Brom fans make up a song about a 15 year-old in 1952 that most Mancunians had yet to hear about?

He was a Wolves fan so they would have been delighted he didn't sign for their local rivals!

In 1952 people weren't singing songs about hoping a 15-year-old was rotting in his grave. You just wouldn't get away with it.

I wouldn't put any credence in that story at all!

After what I have read - Duncan Edwards grew up in a place called Dudley (just outside Birmingham after what I understand) and there were a lot of competition for his signature and WBA-fans apparently felt most outraged when he chose not to sign for them but joined United instead

So after the Munich-disaster it was the WBA fans that came up with the chant - it was also apparently used a lot as grafitti.

True ? Who knows - but it certainly is a lot more plausible than for instance that Liverpool-fans should come up with it. RIdiculing United for losing half their team ? Sure - but targeting one specific player ? Nah - the chant is way too personal. So yes - I am buying that explanation
 
No, that's not what I meant, although it did look that way.

I meant the cockney-reds-that-are-glory-supporters, not cockney reds in themselves. I'm sure there are plenty of people not far from OT that are glory supporters and plenty of people living in the south that have supported United for decades.

And fwiw, technically I'm a 'cockney red', but, like many people, I have family links to Manchester, hence why I support United.

But what about the people who have no links to Manchester, apart from loving the club? There is definitely discrimination on the part of those who perceive themselves to be top reds, better than others especially OOTs.

You'd think we could all just band together and "fight" the rest of the bastards.
 
But what about the people who have no links to Manchester, apart from loving the club? There is definitely discrimination on the part of those who perceive themselves to be top reds, better than others especially OOTs.

You'd think we could all just band together and "fight" the rest of the bastards.

All supporters should have no problem with this either.
 
Well I think people should support their local club by and large - it's as much about community as sport. I find it a bit crap when you can go in the park in London in 2002 and it's wall to wall red (Man Utd and Arsenal) and a couple of years later it's red and blue (and maybe even sky blue in days to come).