Nope, and I don't give a feck.
I was being sarky by the way, knowing that cheeky slag Lao is a Swedey...
And I was referring to Geebs.
Well, I like you, seeing that you don't like swedes.
Nope, and I don't give a feck.
I was being sarky by the way, knowing that cheeky slag Lao is a Swedey...
A childish aussie calling names.. Now that's something you don't get to see every day.. Don't see where my nick begins with a capital letter by the way, you're just as ignorant as the muppets ManYoo-ing.Nope, and I don't give a feck.
I was being sarky by the way, knowing that cheeky slag Lao is a Swedey...
A childish aussie calling names.. Now that's something you don't get to see every day.. Don't see where my nick begins with a capital letter by the way, you're just as ignorant as the muppets ManYoo-ing.
Ah yeah, the regular cocksniffer insult. Your conversation skills are astounding. You grew up jerking off to Nickelodeon in the absence of your crocodile hunter of a father?Silence before I claim Sweden rightly back for the Danes...
As Is aid you cocksniffer, I was being sarcastic.
Apart from the fit blonde chicks, Swedish people are shit.....
Ah yeah, the regular cocksniffer insult. Your conversation skills are astounding. You grew up jerking off to Nickelodeon in the absence of your crocodile hunter of a father?
Just love snotty-nosed debating. You've got any more ways of making a fool of yourself, please let us know.
This is from ThaBigBoss in the newbies.
He asked if I'd post it for him ,so here goes.......
Right Folks here we go once "AGAIN" and for all....... Man Utd is not a term REAL / TRUE United fans refer themselves to... WHY??? This term is mostly only used by other supporters as a complete and utter insult.
In case anyone on this board is not aware rival supporters used to sing a song about Munich and it goes:
Man Utd Man Utd went on a plane, Man Utd Man Utd never came back again...
Now if thats not getting your blood boiling nothing will..
I started this thread way last year on another forum because after being on that board for some time I found more and more people refering to us as THAT name.
We are UNITED, MAN UTD, MANCHESTER UNITED, RED DEVILS. We do not have any songs with THAT name in them nor will you be able to buy any official merchandice using that term, it is not printed on any scarves or badges, also I was at the Reading game and there is no way did that song ring out around the ground.
Now I have been a "United" supporter all my life I am 18 and have never used that phrase to describe the name of my team. It even has annoyed me to write about the song with the name in it, but thought I had to just to get my point over to people who have never heard it ( real United fans forgive me please )
It goes:
Man
U
Never
Intended
Coming
Home
You dont use the phrase Man C Leeds U Aston V etc etc. So dont use 'Man Utd'. Like the song goes "Theres Only One United" so people will know who you support when using this term. All said whenever someone calls us 'Man Utd' I simply correct them. And I think this should be implimented on this board.
So come on lads lets educate the ones that need it and keep THAT name away form our club and this board.The term Utd is the proper abbreviation for the word United and nothing else.Why can some people not just accept this and get over themselves....
If anyone still doesnt understand the "u" is meant to be "you" by the rival fans. It wasnt just chants it was also popular to write this as graffiti
as far as i know this insult dates back to the early 60,s and it wasnt ´Pile fans surprise.
There was huge competition between clubs to sign Duncan Edwards when he was a schoolboy in the early 50s and there was even a newspaper campaign in the midlands to pressure him into signing for a midlands club, as he came from Dudley. His signing for United caused a lot of people in the midlands to regard him as a traitor and he was painted as such by local rags and was a bit of a hate figure for some idiots.
As far as i know it was West Brom fans who first sang (and sorry for posting this)
Duncan Edwards is manure,rotting in his grave
Man You are manure-rotting in your grave
The origin of 'Man Utd' is a song to insult the dead Duncan Edwards.
The ´Pile and Leeds fans copied this with their own 'Man You' /u versions to insult all of the lads who died at Munich.
I hope that makes it a bit clearer that saying Man Utd is a mortal insult, particularly to the older supporters and is fighting talk TBH. A lot of rival fans got a good kicking for the 'Man Utd' insult and to see so-called united fans using it now is shameful.
I hope a few might read this,understand and spread the word.
I also hope a few other people can add a bit to this as i am sure it is only half the full story.
Thanks, ThaBigBoss
Don't worry Johnno...Living in Sydney, I love it when experts tell me that there are more City fans in Manchester than United fans, and have also been questioned when I refer to United as 'The Reds'. They have told me in all their wisdom that it is Liverpool who are called the Reds and that United are known as 'The Red Devils'.
Never when I have been to Old Trafford or in the pub in Manchester or Sydney or wherever ever heard anyone refer to us informally as 'The Red Devils' except perhaps in a newspaper article.
'Man Utd' is what the ABUs, the cockneys and the clueless call us. If you fit into any of those categories please carry on.
It's United, Man United or just plain Manchester (really pisses off city, that)
And most of the French footballers that have played for us, until they knew better. Mon chest air.I actually dont like being reffered to as just plain 'Manchester' - mostly due to the fact that it is only clueless foreigners who ever do it.
I have friends who hate United refer to us as 'Man You' when writing me.
That pisses me off.
I never really understood what the problem with 'Man Utd' is?
I dont use it myself but it doesnt bother me if someone else uses it
Although it does piss of City fans, I actually dont like being reffered to as just plain 'Manchester' - mostly due to the fact that it is only clueless foreigners who ever do it.
It has been explained numerous times in this thread, and if you don't have a problem with it now, there's something wrong.
If you read the thread you will find fans who have supported United for decades saying it is a non issue - plus fans from Manchester saying they and others they know use it - why do you ignore those posts and take it that the other view is the correct one?
United supporters used to use the term Man Utd in the 60's and 70's but it has gradually become a term only used by scousers and ABU's.
He's had more clubs (9?) than Monty, some of them in Yorkshite so it's understandable, if a little lazy. What, Sharpie, a little lazy?Been reading Lee Sharpe's book lately - he refers to us constantly as Man Utd. I don't think he's trying to annoy anyone though, so I guess it's all about context.
What, the view where I'll refuse to use a term that was used to mock the dead, irrelevant of the fact that it was the babes? Yeah, I believe that's correct.
That's what has been used by the Finnish media, for instance, for as long as I can remember (almost 20 years).
Lyon are the only team in the city so to refer to them as Lyon is fine since Lyonnais (of Lyon) is bound inextricably with Olympique of which there is another in Ligue Un. I call Real Madrid, Real Madrid for the reasons you correctly cite. Milan football is a funny thing. One club is pronounced 'Meelan' and not 'Meelano' (the city's Italian name) since it was founded by British people as a cricket club and later the name Milan became pronounced Meelan and the other is called Inter since they are proud to be Internazionale and are referred to as such by Italians themselves.And on the topic of disliking our team being referred to as Manchester, especially by foreigners, it's something I've never understood. Many foreign teams have longer names (such as Lyon are Olympique Lyonnais), and yet we refer to them by only the city name. And to an even larger degree, despite our knowledge of at least two top flight teams in the city, we still often refer to Real Madrid simply as Real (seemingly forgetting the likes of Sociadad and Betis) or Madrid (forgetting about Athletico). And to the same degree when the name Milan comes up, it's taken to mean AC Milan, whereas Inter Milan are referred to as merely Inter. As much as I'd prefer, on a personal level, that we were more distinguished from our local rivals in others minds, we do the same when it comes to foreign teams, so quit bitching about it.
I think it's mainly older fans who don't like it, but that might be a little bit of a generalisation.
My dad hates it, and can't stand people using it, and his reason is that those that use it are usually 'cockney reds' or 'glory supporters', and he can't stand glory hunters because he had to go through the barren years of 1970s and 80s.
So I think it has something to do with long-term supporters hating those who jump on the bandwagon when we're successful when they had to endure decades of nothing.
That's when I started to follow United. All my childhood mates were supporting L1verpool or L**ds. I'm not even a cockney since I was born in Balham.Weren't United the most supported team in the old Div. 2 after they were relegated? Weren't a lot of those supporters from out of town?
A clue...yes.
The term "Man Utd" is rather vulgar. only numpties, kids who dont know any better or ABUs say it.
So Cockney reds are glory supporters?
I hate that kind of generalisation. Weren't United the most supported team in the old Div. 2 after they were relegated? Weren't a lot of those supporters from out of town?
A clue...yes.
Every winning team will have it's glory seekers, and probably some of them even live within a few miles of Old Trafford. But there were thousands of OOTs who supported them before and after they were relegated, and to speak that way about "Cockney Reds" is out of order imo.
Glory seekers are one thing - but don't just lump one section of fans in that category.
"There was huge competition between clubs to sign Duncan Edwards when he was a schoolboy in the early 50s and there was even a newspaper campaign in the midlands to pressure him into signing for a midlands club, as he came from Dudley. His signing for United caused a lot of people in the midlands to regard him as a traitor and he was painted as such by local rags and was a bit of a hate figure for some idiots.
As far as i know it was West Brom fans who first sang (and sorry for posting this)
Duncan Edwards is manure,rotting in his grave
Man You are manure-rotting in your grave
The origin of 'Man Utd' is a song to insult the dead Duncan Edwards."
I cannot believe for one second that the term Man Utd relates to Duncan Edwards.
While there was a lot of competition for his signature, why would West Brom fans make up a song about a 15 year-old in 1952 that most Mancunians had yet to hear about?
He was a Wolves fan so they would have been delighted he didn't sign for their local rivals!
In 1952 people weren't singing songs about hoping a 15-year-old was rotting in his grave. You just wouldn't get away with it.
I wouldn't put any credence in that story at all!
No, that's not what I meant, although it did look that way.
I meant the cockney-reds-that-are-glory-supporters, not cockney reds in themselves. I'm sure there are plenty of people not far from OT that are glory supporters and plenty of people living in the south that have supported United for decades.
And fwiw, technically I'm a 'cockney red', but, like many people, I have family links to Manchester, hence why I support United.
But what about the people who have no links to Manchester, apart from loving the club? There is definitely discrimination on the part of those who perceive themselves to be top reds, better than others especially OOTs.
You'd think we could all just band together and "fight" the rest of the bastards.